close
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Decade merges

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All years are equal, but some years are more equal than others...

A popular quote often misattributed to Vladimir Lenin is that "there are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen." The primary meaning of this quote, particularly in the modern period, is that some years in history had fewer notable things going on than others. However, as we go further back in history, we consider some years to have had fewer notable things going on simply because we know/care less about them. How many events, that we could consider to be of historical consequence, happened in 148 compared to 1948? Not many.

This is reflected on Wikipedia. Most articles of individual years in Classical antiquity and beforehand are mere stubs. These stub articles are usually transcluded into their decade's individual page, with often messy results. This issue has been discussed before, and the solution is clear: these less-than-equal years ought to be merged into their decade's respective article.

Background

[edit]

What makes a year non-notable?

[edit]

It's understandable that an editor may be wary about labeling an entire year as non-notable. How could we say that about a period of time as massive as 365 (or 366, or 367) days? While we probably should not decry an entire year as less "important" from a subjective stance, we can consider a year as non-notable for a number of material reasons.

The primary reason is that we simply know less about some years than others. The gift of the printing press to historiography cannot be underestimated; the modern period is overflowing with primary sources to analyze, sources that academics have studied and, by extension, have established notability for individual years. This is not necessarily the case for Classical antiquity and beforehand. We know less about events and people in that period simply because there are fewer primary sources remaining to tell us about them. There may have been as many "historical events" that occurred in 148 as in 1948, but because we know less (or nothing at all) about them, those years aren't as notable to us.

This fact makes it especially difficult to establish notability for individual years in classical antiquity and beforehand. Due to the significant lack in primary sources available to historians, it can be difficult to ascertain in what exact year a historical event took place. As such, certain types of events that can be easily placed in specific years in the modern period with dated records cannot be given the same treatment in earlier millennia, making any article for an individual year in classical antiquity and beforehand much shorter than it would be.

Even when we know plenty about an individual year, we still may not have much reason to care about it at the same level as we do about a year that came a millennium afterward. As denizens of the 21st century, we are regularly impacted and influenced by the historical events that occurred in the few centuries before us; while we can say the same for classical antiquity and beforehand, that influence is simply less immediate to us. While more events that took place in 148 may have been notable to people in 226, those events are not for us in the contemporary period. This is reflected in the fewer number of reliable secondary sources written about those years, making notability harder to argue for.

Past discussion

[edit]

This phenomenon and its manifestation on Wikipedia was discussed in-depth at a June 2026 AfD concerning the AD 12 article, and whether it should be merged into the 10s article. When the proposer suggested this merge, another editor suggested that similar merges be carried out for the entire first century. The original proposer, not wanting to nominate too many articles at once, instead edited their original proposal to suggest the merge of all ten individual year articles (AD 10, AD 11, AD 12, AD 13, AD 14, AD 15, AD 16, AD 17, AD 18, and AD 19) into the 10s article. This proposal was approved without issue by five separate editors, and the discussion was closed by a sixth as "merge to 10s - all of them."

Another AfD was posted that same month concerning a possible similar merge, albeit regarding the 20s article, citing the precedent established by the prior AfD. At the advice of other editors, this AfD was quickly withdrawn as unnecessary given the previous AfD, and a bold merge was later performed.

Tips on decade merges

[edit]

When going about boldly merging articles of years into articles of decades, keep in mind the following:

  • Remove the transclusion. Many articles of individual decades on Wikipedia are merely the contents of the articles of its ten component years transcluded into itself. This can make the article pre-merge look a little messy, as the styles and contents of the different articles can clash with and contradict one another. Before merging, it is best to remove all the transcluded material beforehand; this is easily done by removing a few lines here and there in the source text.
  • Keep things consistent. Make sure that the new merged decade article maintains the same system of sorting information uniformly. This usually manifests as splitting the article into "Demographics," "Events," "Births," and "Deaths" sections, with the Events section further divided based on location. The same goes for era styles; if the preexisting decade article uses the Anno Domini style, maintain that throughout the merge.
  • Look out for overlapping claims. Many events listed on articles of individual years in classical antiquity are left unsourced, and can be difficult to verify, especially if it contradicts other claims. For example, a figure's death can be listed on multiple articles of individual years if the exact timeline is disputed, which can lead to overlap in the final merged article. Emphasize that certain events are disputed, and add notices or delete entries entirely if needed.
  • Cite attribution. Per Wikipedia's licensing policy, the site requires that attribution be given to editors of the original merged article by linking its page history in the merge's edit summary. As such, merging all ten year articles into the decade article in a single edit should be avoided. Instead, perform a merge for each individual year, with each edit summary linking the respective article's original page history.

When performing such merges, it can also help to link this page in the edit summaries, to provide clarification on what the merge is for and what the precedent for it is. This makes sure that all interested editors are on the same page.

The initial AfD that sparked this effort established a clear precedent for these kinds of merges for the first century. That being said, you would not be prevented from undertaking merges involving years before or after the first century, as long as they are generally considered to be within classical antiquity. Future discussions on this topic can be added to this essay.

Merging list

[edit]

Pending merges

[edit]

Completed merges

[edit]
  • 599 BC, 598 BC, 597 BC, 596 BC, 595 BC, 594 BC, 593 BC, 592 BC, 591 BC, 590 BC → 590s BC
  • 589 BC, 588 BC, 587 BC, 586 BC, 585 BC, 584 BC, 583 BC, 582 BC, 581 BC, 580 BC → 580s BC
  • 9 BC, 8 BC, 7 BC, 6 BC, 5 BC, 4 BC, 3 BC, 2 BC, 1 BC → 0s BC
  • AD 1, AD 2, AD 3, AD 4, AD 5, AD 6, AD 7, AD 8, AD 9 → 0s
  • AD 10, AD 11, AD 12, AD 13, AD 14, AD 15, AD 16, AD 17, AD 18, AD 19 → 10s
  • AD 20, AD 21, AD 22, AD 23, AD 24, AD 25, AD 26, AD 27, AD 28, AD 29 → 20s
  • AD 30, AD 31, AD 32, AD 33, AD 34, AD 35, AD 36, AD 37, AD 38, AD 39 → 30s
  • AD 40, AD 41, AD 42, AD 43, AD 44, AD 45, AD 46, AD 47, AD 48, AD 49 → 40s
  • AD 50, AD 51, AD 52, AD 53, AD 54, AD 55, AD 56, AD 57, AD 58, AD 59 → 50s

See also

[edit]