Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket
Add topicWikiProject Cricket
|
| Main page | Discussion | Tasks | Deletions | The Nets | Assessment | Resources | Contests | Awards | Members |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Cricket and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96Auto-archiving period: 21 days |
| WikiProject Cricket was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 17 January 2011. |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICC Asia and Africa
[edit]Currently the International Cricket Council article lists Asian Cricket Council and Africa Cricket Association as the regional bodies for administration. This is seen across multiple pages including the ICC-administered events such as 2028 Men's T20 World Cup qualification.
But ACC and ACA are independent bodies that are completely autonomous of ICC regional bodies. ICC Asia and ICC Africa are still in-charge of conducting global pathway events, even in the list of members of ICC, teams like Japan and Indonesia are classified as belonging to Asia/EAP, while they solely are members of ICC from EAP region but separately hold the membership of ACC too. This distinction among regional organizations should be implemented, what do others think?
References: Africa, Asia. Cric editor (talk) 06:31, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Cric editor: While the refs confirm their membership to the ICC, there's no source confirming if whether something called "ICC Asia" and "ICC Africa" even exists..? I've searched about this once too and wrote up List of International Cricket Council members#Regional bodies with what I was able to gather on the internet.. Vestrian24Bio 06:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- The fact that multiple teams hold membership across regions points towards this. Besides, in 2016 Aminul Islam was appointed as ICC Asian regional development officer (1, 2). Note that this stint of his is completely different from his term as development officer for China, Thailand and other teams from ACC (3). Multiple national boards have had posts regarding the high performance camps held by ICC Asia too. Cric editor (talk) 07:14, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Even regarding membership of ACC, some of the associate members of ICC (UAE, Hong Kong, Kuwait, Malaysia, Nepal, Singapore and Thailand) are considered as full members under ACC (About ACC). Cric editor (talk) 07:17, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- ICC Asia/Africa was a project by the ICC about 10/15 years ago. There was always the idea to transform the continental cricket councils (like the ECC) into ICC affiliates (a bit like football for regional qualifiers they effectively first used for the World Cricket League). So the ICC founded them and in Europe and Pacific/East Asia they replaced the Cricket Councils. In Asia they did not like it and kept their independence (Africa I assume as well) and so the affiliations are effectively today more an internal tool for development and charity. The ACC and ACA are technically independent and especially the ACC is due to the Asia Cup also financially on top. So yes they exist, and are different from the two councils. And the qualifiers have nothing to do with either the ACC or ICC Asia, they are as war as I know directly organised by the ICC. At least the European ones are clear in their marketing that the qualifying events are ICC direct (and not ICC Europe). Cricket is no Football and ICC not FIFA. So they should be thrown out of the info box there (unless we find concrete sources showing their organisation of the events).--Maphry (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'm fine with removing them from the infoboxes. The point I was going for is that if we were to make separate dedicated articles for ICC Asia and ICC Africa, that wouldn't exactly stand... Vestrian24Bio 14:07, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Article needing cleanup
[edit]Bangladesh–India cricket rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Came upon this recently created article (initiated by @AristocrSirr22) which appears to have since been fed increasing OR. From the looks of it entire sections were lifted from India–Pakistan cricket rivalry (e.g. here ) with a find and replace executed. I am not sure of the notability either (might be liable for AfD) but this certainly requires a cleanup.
@BlackJack, AssociateAffiliate, Spike 'em, Vestrian24Bio, Cric editor, and Maphry: Pinging last active editors here for opinions and help. Gotitbro (talk) 13:54, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- I see that the article has passed through AfD (1, and another but for mostly for procedural reasons 2). So cleanup is the thing that is needed here (stated in both AfDs). Gotitbro (talk) 14:13, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Looks like yet another case of rivalry overstatement, such as we often see at WP:FOOTY. I don't think the rivalry between India and Bangladesh is any more intense than the normal level of competition between Test teams, and it's much less than England v Australia. I agree they both have historic rivalries with Pakistan. As for cleanup, the first thing it needs is a dose of WP:NOTSTATS. Jack (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yep, I dislike many of the similar footy articles that create a rivalry based on stats from teams who happen to have played each other frequently. I've removed a bunch of nicknames that are either unsourced, or sourced only to a personal blog. Spike 'em (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Spike 'em: Yes, these appear to have been entirely made up . The opener of the article also reads thus: "
The India–Bangladesh cricket rivalry is one of the most intense sports rivalries in Asia.
" I doubt it: Afghanistan–Pakistan sports rivalries, Japan–South Korea sports rivalries, China–Japan football rivalry, China–South Korea football rivalry, Iran–Iraq football rivalry, Iran–Saudi Arabia football rivalry, Thailand–Vietnam football rivalry, Australia–Japan football rivalry, Australia–India cricket rivalry, Japan–United States women's soccer rivalry and on and on. - Looks like the drive-by editors who've added fluff here also did the same at another newly minted article: Bangladesh–Sri Lanka cricket rivalry. Which includes this nonsense,
The Naagin Derby, is an intense cricket rivalry.
That name appears to be largely a joke . Gotitbro (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2026 (UTC)- @Tolly4bolly, CAPTAIN RAJU, Jaywardhan009, Vikram maingi, CptViraj, Fade258, Clog Wolf, MNWiki845, Vestrian24Bio, Neeelzzz20, Sagarsq, TNM101, Janeesh 22, 4-RAZOR 01, M.Billoo2000, and Raihanur:
- Further pinging editors from Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Asia cricket task force/Members for opinions and help with these articles. Gotitbro (talk) 06:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- I nominated it for the first AfD, and I still think it should just be deleted.. Vestrian24Bio 07:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Spike 'em: Yes, these appear to have been entirely made up . The opener of the article also reads thus: "
- Yep, I dislike many of the similar footy articles that create a rivalry based on stats from teams who happen to have played each other frequently. I've removed a bunch of nicknames that are either unsourced, or sourced only to a personal blog. Spike 'em (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Looks like yet another case of rivalry overstatement, such as we often see at WP:FOOTY. I don't think the rivalry between India and Bangladesh is any more intense than the normal level of competition between Test teams, and it's much less than England v Australia. I agree they both have historic rivalries with Pakistan. As for cleanup, the first thing it needs is a dose of WP:NOTSTATS. Jack (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Please see this request, opened today soon after the sad news was announced, and have your say. The same request was made in 2019, when it was comprehensively rejected—that discussion is still on the talk page, and includes a very perceptive point made by Lugnuts (remember him?) Jack (talk) 20:46, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Garfield Sobers#age moves
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Garfield Sobers#age moves that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Qwerty123M (talk) 22:14, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
This split proposal was raised in February 2023, and had a clear support consensus, but it hasn't been done. Unless there is a strong objection today, I'll complete it. Jack (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done. We now have two separate tour articles, plus a disambig page. It's exactly what Lugnuts did with New Zealand cricket team in Pakistan in 2022–23, so we should follow that precedent if a similar case should arise in future. Thanks, Jack (talk) 15:21, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, these qualify as set index articles (SIA). You can see a full list of them at Category:Set index articles on sports. Thanks, Jack (talk) 13:59, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Petition
[edit]Some of you may find Wikipedia:Wiki Workers United solidarity interesting. Jack (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
Marcus Trescothick under featured article review
[edit]I have nominated Marcus Trescothick for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria, or help improve the article. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regard to the article's featured status (see review instructions). George Ho (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Walter Bradshaw#Requested move 30 July 2026
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Walter Bradshaw#Requested move 30 July 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~2026-42390-68 (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
