close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb 7;273(1584):283-91.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3331.

The dilemma of female mate selection in the brown bear, a species with sexually selected infanticide

Affiliations

The dilemma of female mate selection in the brown bear, a species with sexually selected infanticide

Eva Bellemain et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Because of differential investment in gametes between sexes, females tend to be the more selective sex. Based on this concept, we investigate mate selection in a large carnivore: the brown bear (Ursus arctos). We hypothesize that, in this species with sexually selected infanticide (SSI), females may be faced with a dilemma: either select a high-quality partner based on phenotypic criteria, as suggested by theories of mate choice, or rather mate with future potentially infanticidal males as a counter-strategy to SSI. We evaluated which male characteristics were important in paternity assignment. Among males available in the vicinity of the females, the largest, most heterozygous and less inbred and also the geographically closest males were more often the fathers of the female's next litter. We suggest that female brown bears may select the closest males as a counter-strategy to infanticide and exercise a post-copulatory cryptic choice, based on physical attributes, such as a large body size, reflecting male genetic quality. However, male-male competition either in the form of fighting before copulation or during the post-copulatory phase, in the form of sperm competition, cannot entirely be ruled out.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographical distances between the centres of the home ranges (or kill location) of 102 reproductive pairs (determined from parentage analysis) of brown bears in two populations in Scandinavia. The horizontal black line represents the distance corresponding to the 95% of the distribution of the distance between reproductive pairs (40 km).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of relatedness coefficients between reproductive pairs (solid line) or potential pairs (dotted line) of brown bears in Scandinavia within a 40 km radius.

References

    1. Amos W, Worthington Wilmer J, Fullard K, Burg T.M, Croxall J.P, Bloch D, Coulson T. The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2001;268:2021–2027. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1751 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson M. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1994. Sexual selection.
    1. Bateson P. Optimal outbreeding. In: Bateson P, editor. Mate choice. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 1983. pp. 257–277.
    1. Beck C.W, Powell L. Evolution of female mate choice based on male age: are older males better mates? Evol. Ecol. Res. 2000;2:107–118.
    1. Bellemain E, Swenson J.E, Taberlet P. Mating strategies in relation to sexually selected infanticide in a nonsocial carnivore: the brown bear. Ethology. 2005a;111:1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01057.x - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources