close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 12;2015(2):CD007948.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007948.pub3.

Skin preparation with alcohol versus alcohol followed by any antiseptic for preventing bacteraemia or contamination of blood for transfusion

Joan Webster  1 , Sally E M Bell-Syer, Ruth Foxlee
Affiliations

Skin preparation with alcohol versus alcohol followed by any antiseptic for preventing bacteraemia or contamination of blood for transfusion

Joan Webster et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Blood for transfusion may become contaminated at any point between collection and transfusion and may result in bacteraemia (the presence of bacteria in the blood), severe illness or even death for the blood recipient. Donor arm skin is one potential source of blood contamination, so it is usual to cleanse the skin with an antiseptic before blood donation. One-step and two-step alcohol based antiseptic regimens are both commonly advocated but there is uncertainty as to which is most effective.

Objectives: To assess the effects of cleansing the skin of blood donors with alcohol in a one-step compared with alcohol in a two-step procedure to prevent contamination of collected blood or bacteraemia in the recipient.

Search methods: In December 2014, for this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL.

Selection criteria: All randomised trials (RCTs) comparing alcohol based donor skin cleansing in a one-step versus a two-step process that includes alcohol and any other antiseptic for pre-venepuncture skin cleansing were considered. Quasi randomised trials were to have been considered in the absence of RCTs.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion.

Main results: No studies (RCTs or quasi RCTs) met the inclusion criteria.

Authors' conclusions: We did not identify any eligible studies for inclusion in this review. It is therefore unclear whether a two-step, alcohol followed by antiseptic skin cleansing process prior to blood donation confers any reduction in the risk of blood contamination or bacteraemia in blood recipients, or conversely whether a one-step process increases risk above that associated with a two-step process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Joan Webster: none. Sally Bell‐Syer: none. Ruth Foxlee: none.

Update of

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Benjamin 2011 {published data only}
    1. Benjamin RJ, Dy B, Warren R, Lischka M, Eder AF. Skin disinfection with a single‐step 2% chlorhexidine swab is more effective than a two‐step povidone‐iodine method in preventing bacterial contamination of apheresis platelets. Transfusion 2011;51(3):531‐8. - PubMed
Blajchman 2004 {published data only}
    1. Blajchman MA, Goldman M, Baeza F. Improving the bacteriological safety of platelet transfusions. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 2004;18(1):11‐24. - PubMed
Calfee 2002 {published data only}
    1. Calfee DP, Farr BM. Comparison of four antiseptic preparations for skin in the prevention of contamination of percutaneously drawn blood cultures: a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002;40(5):1660‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Choudhuri 1990 {published data only}
    1. Choudhuri M, McQueen R, Inoue S, Gordon RC. Efficiency of skin sterilization for a venipuncture with the use of commercially available alcohol or iodine pads. American Journal of Infection Control 1990;18(2):82‐5. - PubMed
de Korte 2006 {published data only}
    1. Korte D, Curvers J, Kort WL, Hoekstra T, Poel CL, Beckers EA, et al. Effects of skin disinfection method, deviation bag, and bacterial screening on clinical safety of platelet transfusions in the Netherlands. Transfusion 2006;46(3):476‐85. - PubMed
Follea 1997 {published data only}
    1. Folléa G, Saint‐Laurent P, Bigey F, Gayet S, Bientz M, Cazenave JP. Quantitative bacteriological evaluation of a method for skin disinfection in blood donors. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique 1997;4(6):523‐31. - PubMed
Goldman 1997 {published data only}
    1. Goldman M, Roy G, Fréchette N, Décary F, Massicotte L, Delage G. Evaluation of donor skin disinfection methods. Transfusion 1997;37(3):309‐12. - PubMed
Kiyoyama 2009 {published data only}
    1. Kiyoyama T, Tokuda Y, Shiiki S, Hachiman T, Shimasaki T, Endo K. Isopropyl alcohol compared with isopropyl alcohol plus povidone‐iodine as skin preparation for prevention of blood culture contamination. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009;47(1):54‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Lee 2002 {published data only}
    1. Lee CK, Ho PL, Chan NK, Mak A, Hong J, Lin CK. Impact of donor arm skin disinfection on the bacterial contamination rate of platelet concentrates. Vox Sanguinis 2002;83(3):204‐8. - PubMed
Little 1999 {published data only}
    1. Little JR, Murray PR, Traynor PS, Spitznagel E. A randomized trial of povidone‐iodine compared with iodine tincture for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on rates of blood culture contamination. American Journal of Medicine 1999;107(2):119‐25. - PubMed
McDonald 2006 {published data only}
    1. McDonald CP. Bacterial risk reduction by improved donor arm disinfection, diversion and bacterial screening. Transfusion Medicine 2006;16(6):381‐96. - PubMed
McDonald 2010 {published data only}
    1. McDonald C, McGuane S, Thomas J, Hartley S, Robbins S, Roy A, et al. A novel rapid and effective donor arm disinfection method. Transfusion 2010;50(1):53‐8. - PubMed
Mimoz 1999 {published data only}
    1. Mimoz O, Karim A, Mercat A, Cosseron M, Falissard B, Parker F, et al. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone‐iodine as skin preparation before blood culture. A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999;131(11):834‐7. - PubMed
Pleasant 1994 {published data only}
    1. Pleasant H, Marini J, Stehling L. Evaluation of three skin preps for use prior to phlebotomy. Tranfusion 1994;34(Supp):14S.
Ramirez‐Arcos 2010 {published data only}
    1. Ramirez‐Arcos S, Goldman M. Skin disinfection methods: prospective evaluation and post implementation results. Transfusion 2010;50(1):59‐64. - PubMed
Schifman 1993 {published data only}
    1. Schifman RB, Pindur A. The effect of skin disinfection materials on reducing blood culture contamination. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1993;99(5):536‐8. - PubMed
Shah 2014 {published data only}
    1. Shah S, Mehta NA, Jadhav SG. Prospective evaluation of 2% (w/v) alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate as an antiseptic agent for blood donor arm preparation. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science 2014;8(2):92‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Shahar 1990 {published data only}
    1. Shahar E, Wohl‐Gottesman BS, Shenkman L. Contamination of blood cultures during venepuncture: fact or myth?. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1990;66(782):1053‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Sutton 1999 {published data only}
    1. Sutton CD, White SA, Edwards R, Lewis MH. A prospective controlled trial of the efficacy of isopropyl alcohol wipes before venesection in surgical patients. Annals of the Royal Collegeof Surgeons of England 1999;81(3):183‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Suwanpimolkul 2008 {published data only}
    1. Suwanpimolkul G, Pongkumpai M, Suankratay C. A randomized trial of 2% chlorhexidine tincture compared with 10% aqueous povidone‐iodine for venipuncture site disinfection: Effects on blood culture contamination rates. Journal of Infection 2008;56(5):354‐9. - PubMed
Trautner 2002 {published data only}
    1. Trautner BW, Clarridge JE, Darouiche RO. Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2002;23(7):397‐401. - PubMed
Wendel 2002 {published data only}
    1. Wendel S. Chemoprophylaxis of transfusion‐transmitted agents in labile blood components. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2002;35(4):275‐81. - PubMed
Wong 2004 {published data only}
    1. Wong P‐Y, Colville VL, White V, Walker HM, Morris RA. Validation and assessment of a blood‐donor arm disinfectant containing chlorhexidine and alcohol. Transfusion 2004;44(8):1238‐42. - PubMed

Additional references

Adams 2007
    1. Adams D, Elliot TS. Skin antiseptics used prior to intravascular catheter insertion. British Journal of Nursing 2007;16(5):278‐80. - PubMed
Bassetti 2012
    1. Bassetti M, Trecarichi EM, Mesini A, Spanu T, Giacobbe DR, Rossi M, et al. Risk factors and mortality of healthcare‐associated and community‐acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2012;18(9):862‐9. - PubMed
Caldeira 2011
    1. Caldeira D, David C, Sampaio C. Skin antiseptics in venous puncture‐site disinfection for prevention of blood culture contamination: systematic review with meta‐analysis. Journal of Hospital Infection 2011;77(3):223‐32. - PubMed
Cid 2003
    1. Cid J, Ortín X, Ardanuy C, Contreras E, Elies E, Martín‐Vega C. Bacterial persistence on blood donors' arms after phlebotomy site preparation: analysis of risk factors. Haematologica 2003;88(7):839‐40. - PubMed
Deeks 2008
    1. Deeks, JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008).The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Wiley‐Blackwell.
Herchline 1997
    1. Herchline T, Gros S. Improving clinical outcome in bacteremia. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1997;4(3):191‐5. - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Wiley‐Blackwell.
Higgins 2011c
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Wiley‐Blackwell.
Klausen 2014
    1. Klausen SS, Hervig T, Seghatchian J, Reikvam H. Bacterial contamination of blood components: Norwegian strategies in identifying donors with higher risk of inducing septic transfusion reactions in recipients. Transfusion and Apheresis Science 2014;51(2):97‐102. - PubMed
Kulkarni 2014
    1. Kulkarni N. A prospective study to determine the frequency of bacterial contamination of platelets. The Indian Journal of Hematology and blood transfusion 2014;30(4):309‐20. - PMC - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J, on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
McDonald 2001
    1. McDonald CP, Lowe P, Roy A, Robbins S, Hartley S, Harrison JF, et al. Evaluation of donor arm disinfection techniques. Vox Sanguinis 2001;80(3):135‐41. - PubMed
Mejer 2012
    1. Mejer N, Westh H, Schønheyder HC, Jensen AG, Larsen AR, Skov R, et al. Stable incidence and continued improvement in short term mortality of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia between 1995 and 2008. BMC Infectious diseases 2012;12(1):260. - PMC - PubMed
Morgan 1993
    1. Morgan D. Is there still a role for antiseptics?. Journal of Tissue Viability 1993;3(3):80‐4.
Sandler 2003
    1. Sandler SG, Yu H, Rassai N. Risks of blood transfusion and their prevention. Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology 2003;1(5):307‐13. - PubMed
SIGN 2009
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random (accessed 20 February 2009).
Sterne 2011
    1. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D on behalf of the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Wiley‐Blackwell.
UK BTS Guidelines 2005
    1. Virge J (Editor). Collection of a blood donation. Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Services in the United Kingdom. 7th Edition. London: TSO (The Stationery Office), 2005:33‐9.
Wagner 2004
    1. Wagner SJ. Transfusion‐transmitted bacterial infection: risks, sources and interventions. Vox Sanguinis 2004;86(3):157‐63. - PubMed
Walther‐Wenke 2008
    1. Walther‐Wenke G. Incidence of bacterial transmission and transfusion reactions by blood components. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2008;46(7):919‐25. - PubMed
Wolkewitz 2011
    1. Wolkewitz M, Frank U, Philips G, Schumacher M, Davey P, BURDEN Study Group. Mortality associated with in‐hospital bacteraemia caused by Staphylococcus aureus: a multistate analysis with follow‐up beyond hospital discharge. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011;66(2):381‐6. - PubMed
Yomtovian 2006
    1. Yomtovian RA, Palavecino EL, Dysktra AH, Downes KA, Morrissey AM, Bajaksouzian S, et al. Evolution of surveillance methods for detection of bacterial contamination of platelets in a university hospital, 1991 through 2004. Transfusion 2006;46(5):719‐30. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources