Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview
- PMID: 32801483
- PMCID: PMC7418451
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104
Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview
Abstract
Recent research and policies recognize the importance of environmental defenders for global sustainability and emphasize their need for protection against violence and repression. However, effective support may benefit from a more systematic understanding of the underlying environmental conflicts, as well as from better knowledge on the factors that enable environmental defenders to mobilize successfully. We have created the global Environmental Justice Atlas to address this knowledge gap. Here we present a large-n analysis of 2743 cases that sheds light on the characteristics of environmental conflicts and the environmental defenders involved, as well as on successful mobilization strategies. We find that bottom-up mobilizations for more sustainable and socially just uses of the environment occur worldwide across all income groups, testifying to the global existence of various forms of grassroots environmentalism as a promising force for sustainability. Environmental defenders are frequently members of vulnerable groups who employ largely non-violent protest forms. In 11% of cases globally, they contributed to halt environmentally destructive and socially conflictive projects, defending the environment and livelihoods. Combining strategies of preventive mobilization, protest diversification and litigation can increase this success rate significantly to up to 27%. However, defenders face globally also high rates of criminalization (20% of cases), physical violence (18%), and assassinations (13%), which significantly increase when Indigenous people are involved. Our results call for targeted actions to enhance the conditions enabling successful mobilizations, and for specific support for Indigenous environmental defenders.
Keywords: EJAtlas; Environmental conflicts; Environmental justice; Environmentalism of the poor; Statistical political ecology; Sustainability.
© 2020 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Acker J. Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gend. Soc. 2006;20:441–464. doi: 10.1177/0891243206289499. - DOI
-
- Akbulut B., Demaria F., Gerber J.-F., Martínez-Alier J. Who promotes sustainability? Five theses on the relationships between the degrowth and the environmental justice movements. Ecol. Econ. 2019;165 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106418. - DOI
-
- Amengual M. Buying stability: the distributive outcomes of private politics in the Bolivian mining industry. World Dev. 2018;104:31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.008. - DOI
-
- Anguelovski I., Martínez Alier J. The “Environmentalism of the Poor” revisited: territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles. Ecol. Econ. 2014;102:167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.005. - DOI
-
- Avila-Calero S. Contesting energy transitions: wind power and conflicts in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. J. Polit. Ecol. 2017:24.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous