close
Skip to main content

r/startrek


Lower Decks did what TNG could never do — make competence funny without making it stupid
Lower Decks did what TNG could never do — make competence funny without making it stupid

Every legacy Trek fan I know went into Lower Decks bracing for parody. Boimler trips over a console, Mariner cracks a joke, roll credits, right? That's not what happened.

What actually makes the show work is that it never punches down at the idea of Starfleet. The jokes are about bureaucracy, about how insane it would actually be to serve on a ship that gets attacked by god-like entities every six weeks and then everyone just... goes back to filling out reports. The humor comes from taking the premise more seriously than the shows that spawned it, not less.

Compare that to something like the TNG episode "Shades of Gray" — a clip show born out of a writers' strike, phoned in, forgettable. Lower Decks is made by people who clearly watched every single frame of TNG/DS9/VOY and loved it enough to know exactly which tropes to lovingly skewer (the away-team-red-shirt fake-out, the technobabble solves everything, the captain's log as narrative crutch) while still landing genuine "boldly go" moments that hit as hard as anything in the prime timeline.

The Boimler/Freeman relationship alone has more earned emotional payoff than most of Voyager's seven seasons of will-they-won't-they.

Anyway — bring on more Cerritos. Fight me in the comments.


Advertisement: 0g sugar. 20 calories. Dunkin’ Zero is the afternoon treat that won’t ruin your day.
0g sugar. 20 calories. Dunkin’ Zero is the afternoon treat that won’t ruin your day.
media poster


Who else would rather have 22 episodes per season but with lower production values?
Who else would rather have 22 episodes per season but with lower production values?

I just saw the first episode of Strantege New Worlds... and it looked like an amazing movie. I loved the look of each scene, and of course I appreciate all the work that the actors and crew put into each episode.

But I can't help feeling that it's SO compressed, SO compact, to get the stories into only 10 episodes that I really miss the longer seasons / lower production values.

I'd *much* rather have 22 episodes per season where we get to delve into deeper character stories, or have the freedom to tell more stories from a different angle.

Anyone else? What kinds of stories would you like to see from Trek that we just won't, because the seasons only have 10 episodes? What would you have liked to see in the other 12 episode slots per season that we'll never get?


If you could remove 1 episode from the star trek canon, what would it be?
If you could remove 1 episode from the star trek canon, what would it be?

It can be a really bad episode, an episode that introduces a plot point you don't like, or a piece of information/backstory about a particular character you'd rather not be true, an episode that fails or is counterproductive to the franchise in some other way, any reason you want. But just one episode, not a series or a season etc.

Edit: I may as well put mine on here,the only episode I actively Hate. I can't stand it, it is the definite worst episode in all of star trek that I have seen, (which is everything up to S2 of SNW) and it introduced an origin story into cannon that absolutely made a legacy race worse and added nothing to the greater star trek universe. Very Unlikeable characters, annoying, and just a pointless use of paramount's money... The Trouble With Edward