Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation. (Q34598414)

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

title

Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation (English)

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

4

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

5

E Neely Atkinson

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

1

Tamara Miner Haygood

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

7

Gary J Whitman

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

author name string

Jihong Wang

series ordinal

2

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

Deanna Lane

series ordinal

3

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

Tanya Stephens

series ordinal

6

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

publication date

13 February 2009

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

Journal of Digital Imaging

21 January 2020

language of work or name

English

0 references

published in

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

volume

23

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

issue

2

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

page(s)

170-180

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms

21 January 2020

cites work

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS.

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Population-based Mammography Screening: Comparison of Screen-Film and Full-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading—Oslo I Study

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3043768

Time needs in evaluating digital thoracic images on the monitor in comparison with alternator

26 October 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19214635

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1007/S10278-009-9177-9

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

journals/jdi/HaygoodWLGASW10

21 January 2020

DBLP publication ID

1 reference

DBLP Dataset 2021-01-02

Dimensions publication ID

28 January 2021

0 references

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:19214635%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

21 January 2020

PubMed publication ID

19214635

1 reference