Conceptual Analysis in Metaethics

In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett, The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 536-551 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A critical survey of various positions on the nature, use, possession, and analysis of normative concepts. We frame our treatment around G.E. Moore’s Open Question Argument, and the ways metaethicists have responded by departing from a Classical Theory of concepts. In addition to the Classical Theory, we discuss synthetic naturalism, noncognitivism (expressivist and inferentialist), prototype theory, network theory, and empirical linguistic approaches. Although written for a general philosophical audience, we attempt to provide a new perspective and highlight some underappreciated problems about normative concepts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-21

Downloads
2,116 (#13,965)

6 months
266 (#25,669)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

N. G. Laskowski
University of Maryland, College Park
Stephen Finlay
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism.Thomas Pölzler & Jennifer Cole Wright - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (6):1141-1169.
Categorical phenomenalism about sexual orientation.T. R. Whitlow & N. G. Laskowski - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106 (3):581-596.
Resisting Reductive Realism.N. G. Laskowski - 2020 - In Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 15. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 96 - 117.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael R. Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Principia ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.David Enoch - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Being Realistic About Reasons.Thomas Scanlon - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 57 references / Add more references