close
Skip to main content

Empowering Teachers to Enhance Student High Order Thinking Skills with Artificial Intelligence Educational Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Two Decades of TEL. From Lessons Learnt to Challenges Ahead (EC-TEL 2025)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence Educational Tools (AIED) are poised to transform educational practices by enabling personalised learning, automating administrative tasks, and delivering real-time feedback. However, the ethical and constructive implementation of AIED in K-12 education remains a pressing concern, particularly among teachers. Even when teachers view AIED as a highly transformative tool, they often remain reluctant to experiment with it in the classroom, primarily because they feel unprepared and lack confidence in using AIED effectively. This study aims to address these gaps by exploring the constructive applications of AIED to empower teachers in enhancing students’ cognitive engagement (based on ICAP framework) and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). A five-month teacher training course was conducted, incorporating pre- and post-surveys to assess teachers’ confidence, knowledge, and appropriation of AIED. Teachers engaged in training on AI-related risks and tools, designed lessons that integrated AIED, and gathered student feedback. Teacher training surveys (N = 17) were analysed with paired samples T-tests; deductive content analysis focusing on HOTS and the role of AIED was conducted based on ten lesson plans. For triangulation, descriptive analysis was applied to the student feedback survey (N = 240) about their perception of such learning activities. Overall, the study shows that teacher training empowered teachers in using AIED; the alignment of lesson activities with ICAP principles might depend on the learning community; and AI-supported learning can foster HOTS depending on the type of learning activities and the AIED role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - view details

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abosalem, Y.: Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. Int. J. Second. Educ. 4(1), 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun, S., Greenhow, C.: Artificial intelligence in education: addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI Ethics 2(3), 431–440 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almasri, F.: Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: a systematic review of empirical research. Res. Sci. Educ. 54(5), 977–997 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsowat, H.: An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: effects on english language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. J. Educ. Pract. 7(9), 108–121 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwaqdani, M.: Investigating teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence tools in education: potential and difficulties. Educ. Inf. Technol. 30, 2737–2755 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, N., et al.: The climate and sustainability implications of generative AI. In: An MIT Exploration of Generative AI (2024). https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.9070dfe7

  • Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, M.A., Rodríguez, R.J., Ishmael, K.: Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T., Boucher, N.S.: Applying the ICAP framework to improve classroom learning. In: In their Own Words: What Scholars and Teachers Want You to Know About Why and How to Apply the Science of Learning in Your Academic Setting, pp. 94–110 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichekian, T., Benteux, B.: The potential of learning with (and not from) artificial intelligence in education. Front. Artif. Intell. 5, 903051 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.903051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, W.: Strategies for Developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills Grades 6–12. Teacher Created Materials (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooqi, M.T., Amanat, I., Awan, S.M.: Ethical considerations and challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review. J. Excell. Manag. Sci. 3, 35–50 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, K.A., et al.: Development of a self-report instrument for measuring in-class student engagement reveals that pretending to engage is a significant unrecognized problem. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0205828 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanizadeh, A., Al-Hoorie, A.H., Jahedizadeh, S.: Higher order thinking skills. In: Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Language Classroom: A Concise Guide. Second Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 1–51. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56711-8_1

  • Giannakos, M., et al.: The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behav. Inf. Technol. 1–27 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökçearslan, S., Tosun, C., Erdemir, Z.G.: Benefits, challenges, and methods of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in education: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Technol. Educ. 7(1), 19–39 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J.A., Donoghue, G.M.: Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model. npj Sci. Learn. 1(1), 1–13 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, A.A., Theophilou, E., Hernández-Leo, D.: Artificial fantasy: the effect of generative AI on cognitive empathy in creative problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 1–23 (2025)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpouzis, K.: Artificial intelligence in education: ethical considerations and insights from ancient Greek philosophy. In: Proceedings of the 13th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SETN ‘24), Article 57, p. 7. Association for Computing Machinery (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3688671.3688772

  • Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(4), 212–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-P., Set al.: The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘25), pp. 1–23. ACM, Yokohama (2025).https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778

  • Ley, T., Maier, R., Thalmann, S., Waizenegger, L., Pata, K., Ruiz-Calleja, A.: A knowledge appropriation model to connect scaffolded learning and knowledge maturation in workplace learning settings. Vocat. Learn. 13, 91–112 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento-Márquez, E.M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., Poom-Valickis, K.: Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 45(4), 548–571 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J.E.: Critical Thinking and Education. Routledge, London (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Apino, E., Anazifa, R.D.: Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Prob. Educ. 21st Century 76(2), 215–230 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saar, M., Ljalikova, A., Beardsley, M.Y.: CLIL and EFL teacher perspectives on AI-EdTech: an exploration of opportunities and concerns. In: European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 390–405. Springer, Cham (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabzalieva, E., Valentini, A.: ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO Digital Library (2023). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146

  • Yim, I.H.Y., Wegerif, R.: Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) educational learning tools: an exploratory study on AI literacy for young students. Fut. Educ. Res. 2(4), 318–345 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by Eramus+ 2023-1-ES01-KA220-SCH-000157262 and PID2023-146692OB-C33 - MICIU/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033. DHL (Serra Húnter) acknowledges ICREA Academia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merike Saar.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2026 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saar, M., Ljalikova, A., Theophilou, E., Alkhasawneh, S.N., Hernández-Leo, D. (2026). Empowering Teachers to Enhance Student High Order Thinking Skills with Artificial Intelligence Educational Tools. In: Tammets, K., Sosnovsky, S., Ferreira Mello, R., Pishtari, G., Nazaretsky, T. (eds) Two Decades of TEL. From Lessons Learnt to Challenges Ahead. EC-TEL 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 16063. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03870-8_30

Download citation

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics