close
Skip to main content

FluoroSAM: A Language-Promptable Foundation Model for Flexible X-Ray Image Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2025 (MICCAI 2025)

Abstract

Language promptable X-ray image segmentation would enable greater flexibility for human-in-the-loop workflows in diagnostic and interventional precision medicine. Prior efforts have contributed task-specific models capable of solving problems within a narrow scope, but expanding to broader use requires additional data, annotations, and training time. Recently, language-aligned foundation models (LFMs) – machine learning models trained on large amounts of highly variable image and text data thus enabling broad applicability – have emerged as promising tools for automated image analysis. Existing foundation models for medical image analysis focus on scenarios and modalities where large, richly annotated datasets are available. However, the X-ray imaging modality features highly variable image appearance and applications, from diagnostic chest X-rays to interventional fluoroscopy, with varying availability of data. To pave the way toward an LFM for comprehensive and language-aligned analysis of arbitrary medical X-ray images, we introduce FluoroSAM, a language-promptable variant of the Segment-Anything Model, trained from scratch on 3M synthetic X-ray images from a wide variety of human anatomies, imaging geometries, and viewing angles. These include pseudo-ground truth masks for 128 organ types and 464 tools with associated text descriptions. FluoroSAM is capable of segmenting myriad anatomical structures and tools based on natural language prompts, thanks to the novel incorporation of vector quantization (VQ) of text embeddings in the training process. We demonstrate FluoroSAM’s performance quantitatively on real X-ray images and showcase on several applications how FluoroSAM is a key enabler for rich human-machine interaction in the X-ray image acquisition and analysis context. Information on data, weights, and code is available at https://github.com/arcadelab/fluorosam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - view details

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, T.B., et al.: Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv (May 2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165

  2. Candemir, S., et al.: Lung segmentation in chest radiographs using anatomical atlases with nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33(2), 577–590 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2290491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Çallı, E., Sogancioglu, E., van Ginneken, B., van Leeuwen, K.G., Murphy, K.: Deep learning for chest X-ray analysis: a survey. Med. Image Anal. 72, 102125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102125

  4. Chen, Z., et al.: CheXagent: towards a Foundation Model for Chest X-Ray Interpretation. arXiv (Jan 2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.12208

  5. Edgar, H., Daneshvari Berry, S., Moes, E., Adolphi, N., Bridges, P., Nolte, K.: New mexico decedent image database. Office of the Medical Investigator, University of New Mexico (2020). https://doi.org/10.25827/5s8c-n515

  6. Fan, L., Krishnan, D., Isola, P., Katabi, D., Tian, Y.: Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewrites. arXiv (May 2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.20088

  7. Gao, C., et al.: Synthetic data accelerates the development of generalizable learning-based algorithms for X-ray image analysis. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5(3), 294–308 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00629-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Irvin, J., et al.: CheXpert: a Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison. arXiv (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.07031

  9. Jiang, Y., et al.: CoMT: Chain-of-Medical-Thought Reduces Hallucination in Medical Report Generation. arXiv (Jun 2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.11451

  10. Killeen, B.D., Chaudhary, S., Osgood, G., Unberath, M.: Take a shot! natural language control of intelligent robotic X-ray systems in surgery. Int. J. CARS 19(6), 1165–1173 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03120-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Killeen, B.D., Cho, S.M., Armand, M., Taylor, R.H., Unberath, M.: In silico simulation: a key enabling technology for next-generation intelligent surgical systems. Prog. Biomed. Eng. 5(3), 032001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/acd28b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Killeen, B.D., et al.: An autonomous X-ray image acquisition and interpretation system for assisting percutaneous pelvic fracture fixation. Int. J. CARS, 1–8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02941-y

  13. Killeen, B.D., Suresh, A., Gomez, C., Íñigo, B., Bailey, C., Unberath, M.: Intelligent control of robotic X-ray devices using a language-promptable digital twin. Int. J. CARS 20(6), 1125–1134 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03351-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Killeen, B.D., et al.: Pelphix: surgical Phase Recognition from X-Ray Images in Percutaneous Pelvic Fixation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2023, pp. 133–143. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (Oct 2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43996-4_13

  15. Kirillov, A., et al.: Segment Anything. arXiv (Apr 2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02643

  16. Liu, X., Peng, H., Zheng, N., Yang, Y., Hu, H., Yuan, Y.: Efficientvit: memory efficient vision transformer with cascaded group attention. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 14420–14430 (June 2023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luijten, G., et al.: 3D surgical instrument collection for computer vision and extended reality. Sci. Data 10(796), 1–12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02684-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma, J., He, Y., Li, F., Han, L., You, C., Wang, B.: Segment anything in medical images. Nat. Commun. 15(654), 1–9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44824-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy, A., Bell, D., Knipe, H., et al.: General radiography curriculum. Radiopaedia.org (2020) https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-48992, reference article, Accessed on 22 Feb 2025

  20. Oord, A.v.d., Vinyals, O., Kavukcuoglu, K.: Neural Discrete Representation Learning. arXiv (Nov 2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.00937

  21. Radford, A., et al.: Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. arXiv (Feb 2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.00020

  22. Ravi, N., et al.: SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos. arXiv (Aug 2024).https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.00714

  23. Sang, Y., et al.: Benchmark of Segmentation Techniques for Pelvic Fracture in CT and X-ray: summary of the PENGWIN 2024 Challenge. arXiv (Apr 2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02382

  24. Silva, G., Oliveira, L., Pithon, M.: Automatic segmenting teeth in X-ray images: Trends, a novel data set, benchmarking and future perspectives. Expert Syst. Appl. 107, 15–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Unberath, M., et al.: Enabling machine learning in X-ray-based procedures via realistic simulation of image formation. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 14(9), 1517–1528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-02011-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Unberath, M., et al.: DeepDRR – a catalyst for machine learning in fluoroscopy-guided procedures. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11073, pp. 98–106. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Wasserthal, J., et al.: TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence (Jul 2023). https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230024

  28. Zhao, W., et al.: Artificial intelligence in image-guided radiotherapy: a review of treatment target localization. Quantitat. Imaging Med. Surgery 11(12), 4881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-199

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Link Foundation Fellowship for Modeling, Training, and Simulation; the NIH under Grant No. R01EB036341, the NSF under Award No. 2239077, and Johns Hopkins University Internal Funds. The skull radiograph in Fig. 5 is courtesy of Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 16462.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin D. Killeen.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2026 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Killeen, B.D. et al. (2026). FluoroSAM: A Language-Promptable Foundation Model for Flexible X-Ray Image Segmentation. In: Gee, J.C., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2025. MICCAI 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15966. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04981-0_24

Download citation

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Profiles

  1. Benjamin D. Killeen