close
Skip to main content
Log in

Direct coupling of dual-horizon peridynamics with finite elements for irregular discretization without an overlap zone

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents the coupling of dual horizon bond-based, ordinary state-based and non-ordinary state-based peridynamic (PD) with traditional finite elements in ANSYS, a commercial software. Non-uniform mesh with a varying horizon causes spurious wave reflections and ghost forces between the PD points due to the assumption of uniform horizon in the derivation of PD equilibrium equations. However, the concept of dual horizon PD permits non-uniform discretization with a varying horizon. The coupling approach employs the weak form of the PD governing equations. The PD and FE regions share the same nodes along the interface without an overlap zone or constraint conditions. MATRIX27 elements native to ANSYS are used for the PD region and the traditional elements for the remaining region. Failure is introduced gradually through the EKILL option in ANSYS. The coefficients of MATRIX27 element are updated once the EKILL option is executed. The accuracy of the approach is demonstrated by considering isotropic elastic plates subjected to various types of boundary conditions under quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Also, its fidelity is demonstrated for quasi-static crack propagation by considering double cantilever beam and three-point bending test specimens. The results from the coupled PD/FE approach with non-uniform discretizaton agree well with those of FEM for all boundary and loading conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88(2):151–184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Silling S, Littlewood D, Seleson P (2015) Variable horizon in a peridynamic medium. J Mech Mater Struct 10(5):591–612

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobaru F, Ha YD (2011) Adaptive refinement and multiscale modeling in 2D peridynamics. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 9:635–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dipasquale D, Sarego G, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U (2016) Dependence of crack paths on the orientation of regular 2D peridynamic grids. Eng Fract Mech 160:248–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu Y, Chen H, Spencer BW, Madenci E (2018) Thermomechanical peridynamic analysis with irregular non-uniform domain discretization. Eng Fract Mech 197:92–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorduncu M, Madenci E (2022) Finite element implementation of ordinary state-based peridynamics with variable horizon. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01641-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2017) Dual-horizon peridynamics: a stable solution to varying horizons. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:762–782

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilic B, Madenci E (2010) Coupling of peridynamic theory and the finite element method. J Mech Mater Struct 5(5):707–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu W, Hong JW (2012) A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 245:163–175

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lubineau G, Azdoud Y, Han F, Rey C, Askari A (2012) A morphing strategy to couple non-local to local continuum mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 60(6):1088–1102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Han F, Lubineau G, Azdoud Y, Askari A (2016) A morphing approach to couple state-based peridynamics with classical continuum mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 301:336–358

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Seleson P, Beneddine S, Prudhomme S (2013) A force-based coupling scheme for peridynamics and classical elasticity. Comput Mater Sci 66:34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seleson P, Ha YD, Beneddine S (2015) Concurrent coupling of bond-based peridynamics and the Navier equation of classical elasticity by blending. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 13(2):91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Elia M, Perego M, Bochev P, Littlewood D (2016) A coupling strategy for nonlocal and local diffusion models with mixed volume constraints and boundary conditions. Comput Math Appl 71(11):2218–2230

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Galvanetto U, Mudric T, Shojaei A, Zaccariotto M (2016) An effective way to couple FEM meshes and Peridynamics grids for the solution of static equilibrium problems. Mech Res Commun 76:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li H, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Ye H, Lu M (2018) An implicit coupling finite element and peridynamic method for dynamic problems of solid mechanics with crack propagation. Int J Appl Mech 10(04):1850037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ongaro G, Seleson P, Galvanetto U, Ni T, Zaccariotto M (2021) Overall equilibrium in the coupling of peridynamics and classical continuum mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 381:113515

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Madenci E (2022) A coupled peridynamic and finite element approach in ANSYS framework for fatigue life prediction based on the kinetic theory of fracture. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 4(1):51–87

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Madenci E, Zhang Q (2022) ANSYS implementation of a coupled 3D peridynamic and finite element analysis for crack propagation under quasi-static loading. Eng Fract Mech 260:108179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun B, Li S, Gu Q, Ou J (2019) Coupling of peridynamic and numerical substructure method for modeling structures with local discontinuities. Comput Model Eng Sci (CMES) 120(3):739–757

    Google Scholar 

  22. D’Elia M, Li X, Seleson P, Tian X, Yu Y (2022) A review of local-to-nonlocal coupling methods in nonlocal diffusion and nonlocal mechanics. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 4:1–50

  23. Bie YH, Liu ZM, Yang H, Cui XY et al (2020) Abaqus implementation of dual peridynamics for brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 372:113398

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Anicode SVK, Madenci E (2022) Seamless coupling of bond- and state-based peridynamic and finite element analyses. Mech Mater 173:104433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic theory and its applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2010) Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics. In: Advances in applied mechanics, vol 44. Elsevier, pp 73–168

  27. Gu X, Madenci E, Zhang Q (2018) Revisit of non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 190:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anicode SVK, Madenci E (2022) Bond-and state-based peridynamic analysis in a commercial finite element framework with native elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 398:115208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Madenci E, Barut A, Phan N (2021) Bond-based peridynamics with stretch and rotation kinematics for opening and shearing modes of fracture. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 3(3):211–254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Madenci E, Barut A, Futch M (2016) Peridynamic differential operator and its applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 304:408–451

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Madenci E, Dorduncu M, Barut A, Phan N (2018) Weak form of peridynamics for nonlocal essential and natural boundary conditions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 337:598–631

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Madenci E, Roy P, Behera D (2022) Advances in peridynamics. Springer International Publishing, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Madenci E (2017) Peridynamic integrals for strain invariants of homogeneous deformation. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech (Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik) 97(10):1236–1251

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen H, Spencer BW (2019) Peridynamic bond-associated correspondence model: stability and convergence properties. Int J Numer Methods Eng 117(6):713–727

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Madenci E, Dorduncu M, Phan N, Gu X (2019) Weak form of bond-associated non-ordinary state-based peridynamics free of zero energy modes with uniform or non-uniform discretization. Eng Fract Mech 218:106613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roy P, Behera D, Madenci E (2020) Peridynamic simulation of finite elastic deformation and rupture in polymers. Eng Fract Mech 236:107226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Madenci E, Barut A, Dorduncu M (2019) Peridynamic differential operator for numerical analysis. Springer International Publishing, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Gu X, Zhang Q, Madenci E, Xia X (2019) Possible causes of numerical oscillations in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics and a bond-associated higher-order stabilized model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 357:112592

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83(17–18):1526–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Madenci E, Barut A, Dorduncu M, Phan ND (2018) Coupling of peridynamics with finite elements without an overlap zone. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, Florida, paper No. AIAA-2018-1462

  41. ANSYS 18.2 Mechanical User’s Guide, 2017

  42. Diyaroglu C, Madenci E, Phan N (2019) Peridynamic homogenization of microstructures with orthotropic constituents in a finite element framework. Compos Struct 227:111334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ni T, Zaccariotto M, Zhu QZ, Galvanetto U (2021) Coupling of FEM and ordinary state-based peridynamics for brittle failure analysis in 3D. Mech Adv Mater Struct 28(9):875–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen F, Yu Y, Zhang Q, Gu X (2020) Hybrid model of peridynamics and finite element method for static elastic deformation and brittle fracture analysis. Eng Anal Bound Elem 113:17–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was performed as part of the ongoing research at the MURI Center for Material Failure Prediction through Peridynamics at the University of Arizona (AFOSR Grant no. FA9550-14-1-0073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdogan Madenci.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anicode, S.V.K., Madenci, E. Direct coupling of dual-horizon peridynamics with finite elements for irregular discretization without an overlap zone. Engineering with Computers 40, 605–635 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01800-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01800-3

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Sundaram Vinod K. Anicode