close
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The assignment of project managers to projects in an uncertain dynamic environment

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a project-based organization that deals with an assignment problem in which a set of projects must be assigned to a group of project managers. This assignment is done based on the relative contributions of projects to the organizational mission and a matching score between each pair of a project and a project manager. We assume that some projects are deterministic, and the organization has signed their corresponding contracts while others are stochastic, i.e. the organization has submitted bids for these projects and may or may not win them in the future. Furthermore, we consider a finite planning horizon and presume a predetermined start time for each deterministic and stochastic project. We develop two models including a multi-stage stochastic integer programming model and a stochastic dynamic programming model to solve the problem. The latter shows better performance for small-size and less complex instances whereas the former gives better performance for more complex instances. We also developed a heuristic algorithm to solve large-size and more complex instances. Computational results indicate that the developed heuristic algorithm can reach near-optimal solutions in reasonable CPU run times and dominates the two other solution approaches particularly for large-size instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Algorithm 1
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Albareda-Sambola, M., Vlerk, M. H., & Fernández, E. (2006). Exact solutions to a class of stochastic generalized assignment problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(2), 465–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castanon, D. A., & Wohletz, J. M. (2009). Model predictive control for stochastic resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(8), 1739–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, L., Hobbs, B., & Turner, J. R. (2006). Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, D. O., Sadeh, A., & Malach-Pines, A. (2006). Projects and project managers: The relationship between project managers’ personality, project types, and project success. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, S. E., & Shenbar, A. J. (2000). Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadad, Y., Keren, B., & Laslo, Z. (2013). A decision-making support system module for project manager selection according to past performance. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 532–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J., Keim, G., & Medcof, J. W. (2000). Realistic criteria for project manager selection and development. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydar, M., O’Reilly, M. M., Trainer, E., Fackrell, M., Taylor, P. G., & Tirdad, A. (2022). A stochastic model for the patient-bed assignment problem with random arrivals and departures. Annals of Operations Research, 315, 813–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPMA. (2015). ICB-IPMA competence baseline version 4.0. Nijkerk: International Project Management Association

  • Kang, K., Shanthikumar, J. G., & Altinkemer, K. (2016). Postponable acceptance and assignment: A stochastic dynamic programming approach. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 18(4), 493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1–2), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, L. J., Randels, D., & Swann, T. K. (2000). Heery International’s spreadsheet optimization model for assigning managers to construction projects. Interfaces, 30(6), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, E. C., Alencar, L. H., & Costa, A. P. (2018). Decision process of allocating projects to project managers. Production Planning & Control, 29(8), 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmowski, Z., & Sidorowicz, A. (2020). An application of dynamic programming to assign pressing tanks at wineries. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(1), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakul, P. (2011). Project manager assignment and its impact on multiple project management effectiveness: An empirical study of an IT organization. Engineering Management Journal, 23(4), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakul, P., Milosevic, D. Z., & Anderson, T. R. (2007). A decision support model for project manager assignments. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentico, D. W. (2007). Assignment problems: A golden anniversary survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 774–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo, M. L. (2016). Scheduling: Theory, algorithms, and systems. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-34(1), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7 ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute

  • Russell, L. (2015). Project management for trainers. American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seboni, L., & Ssegawa, J. (2022). Does a project manager assignment process affect project management performance indicators? An empirical study. Sustainability, 14(13), 7637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varajão, J., & Cruz-Cunha, M. M. (2013). Using AHP and the IPMA Competence Baseline in the project managers selection process. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3342–3354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (1988). Developing competitive bids: A framework for information processing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Yeh, C. H. (2014). A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, M., Fu, C., & Yang, S.-L. (2020). Group consensus reaching based on a combination of expert weight and expert reliability. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 369, 124902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., He, F., Lin, X., & Shen, M.Z.-J. (2021). Mechanism design for stochastic dynamic parking resource allocation. Production and Operations Management, 30(10), 3615–3634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitiené, J., & Marina, V. (2008). Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 462–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Aidin Rezaeian, Hamidreza Koosha & Mohammad Ranjbar

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Saeed Poormoaied

Authors
  1. Aidin Rezaeian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamidreza Koosha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Ranjbar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saeed Poormoaied
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidreza Koosha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaeian, A., Koosha, H., Ranjbar, M. et al. The assignment of project managers to projects in an uncertain dynamic environment. Ann Oper Res 341, 1107–1134 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05958-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05958-x

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Hamidreza Koosha View author profile