close
Skip to main content
Log in

Modified Two-Point Stepsize Gradient Methods for Unconstrained Optimization

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For unconstrained optimization, the two-point stepsize gradient method is preferable over the classical steepest descent method both in theory and in real computations. In this paper we interpret the choice for the stepsize in the two-point stepsize gradient method from the angle of interpolation and propose two modified two-point stepsize gradient methods. The modified methods are globally convergent under some mild assumptions on the objective function. Numerical results are reported, which suggest that improvements have been achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Akaike, “On a successive transformation of probability distribution and its application to the analysis of the optimum gradient method,” Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. Tokyo, vol. 11, pp. 1–17, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Barzilai and J.M. Borwein, “Two point step size gradient methods,” IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 8, pp. 141–148, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.G. Birgin, I. Chambouleyron, and J.M. Martínez, “Estimation of the optical constants and the thickness of thin films using unconstrained optimization,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 151, pp. 862–880, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.G. Birgin and Y.G. Evtushenko, “Automatic differentiation and spectral projected gradient methods for optimal control problems,” Optim. Methods Softw., vol. 10, pp. 125–146, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.G. Birgin, J.M. Martínez, and M. Raydan, “Nonmonotone spectral projected gradient methods for convex sets,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1196–1211, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Cauchy, “Méthode générale pour la résolution des systèms d'equations simultanées,” Comp. Rend. Sci. Paris, vol. 25, pp. 46–89, 1847.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y.H. Dai and L.Z. Liao, “R-Linear Convergence of the Barzilai and Borwein Gradient Method,” Academy of Mathematics and Systems Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Research report AMSS-1999-081, 1999. Also in IMA J. Numer. Anal., accepted.

  8. R. Fletcher, “Low storage methods for unconstrained optimization,” Lectures in Applied Mathematics (AMS), vol. 26, pp. 165–179, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.E. Forsythe, “On the asymptotic directions of the s-dimensional optimum gradient method,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 11, pp. 57–76, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Friedlander, J.M. Martínez, B. Molina, and M. Raydan, “Gradient method with retards and generalizations,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 36, pp. 275–289, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Glunt, T.L. Hayden, and M. Raydan, “Molecular conformations from distance matrices,” J. Comput. Chem., vol. 14, pp. 114–120, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Grippo, F. Lampariello, and S. Lucidi, “Anonmonotone line search technique for Newton's method,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 23, pp. 707–716, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.B. Liu and Y.H. Dai, “Minimization Algorithms based on Supervisor and Searcher Co-operation. I:-Faster and robust gradient algorithms for minimization problems with stronger noises,” Academy of Mathematics and Systems Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Research report AMSS-1999-085, 1999. Also in JOTA, accepted.

  14. J.J. Morè, B.S. Garbow, and K.E. Hillstrom, “Testing unconstrained optimization software,”ACMTransactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 7, pp. 17–41, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Raydan, “On the Barzilai and Borwein choice of steplength for the gradient method,” IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 13, pp. 321–326, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Raydan, “The Barzilai and Borwein gradient method for the large scale unconstrained minimization problem,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Yuan “Amodified BFGS algorithm for unconstrained optimization,” IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 11, pp. 325–332, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Yuan, “Numerical methods for nonlinear programming,” Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1993 (in Chinese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, Y., Yuan, J. & Yuan, YX. Modified Two-Point Stepsize Gradient Methods for Unconstrained Optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications 22, 103–109 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014838419611

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014838419611