close
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA

Nature Genetics volume 23, page 147 (1999) Cite this article

Save article
View saved research

The Human Genome Project, from one perspective, began in 1981 with the publication1 of the complete sequence of human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The Cambridge reference sequence (CRS), as it is now designated, continues to be indispensable for studies of human evolution, population genetics and mitochondrial diseases. It has been recognized for some time, however, that the CRS differs at several sites from the mtDNA sequences obtained by other investigators2,3. These discrepancies may reflect either true errors in the original sequencing analysis or rare polymorphisms in the CRS mtDNA. A further complication is that the original mtDNA sequence was principally derived from a single individual of European descent, although it also contained some sequences from both HeLa and bovine mtDNA (ref. 1). To resolve these uncertainties, we have completely resequenced the original placental mtDNA sample.

The results of the resequencing confirm that there are both errors and rare polymorphisms in the CRS (Table 1). There are 11 nucleotide positions at which the original sequence contains the incorrect nucleotide (all sequences here refer to that of the CRS mtDNA L-strand), one of which involves the CC doublet at positions 3,106 and 3,107 in the original sequence, which is actually a single cytosine residue. The other errors are mistakes in the identification of single base pairs and typically involve the incorrect assignment of a guanine residue. Errors at nt 14,272 and 14,365 result from the use of the bovine mtDNA sequence at ambiguous sites1. There are an additional seven nucleotide positions at which the original CRS is correct and which represent rare (or even private) polymorphic alleles. Six of these polymorphisms are single base pair substitutions, although one involves the simple repeat of cytosine residues at nt 311–315. The CRS has five residues in this repeat, whereas most other human mtDNAs have six.

Table 1 Reanalysis of the Cambridge reference sequence
Full size table

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Anderson, S. et al. Nature 290, 457–465 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, M.D. et al. Genetics 130, 163–173 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Howell, N., McCullough, D.A., Kubacka, I., Halvorson, S. & Mackey, D. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50, 1333–1337 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Torroni, A. et al. Genetics 144, 1835–1850 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamminen, T. et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 5, 271–279 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torroni, A. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1137–1152 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Howell, N. & McCullough, D.A. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 47, 629–634 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell, N. et al. Genetics 140, 285–302 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Biggin, M.D., Gibson, J.J. & Hong, G.F. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3963–3965 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Coulson and F. Sanger for their generous donation of the original placental mtDNA sample. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (R.M.A. and D.M.T.), Wellcome Trust (D.M.T., P.F.C., R.N.L. and N.H.) and the John Sealy Memorial Endowment Fund (N.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurology, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK

    Richard M. Andrews

  2. Biology Division 0656, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, 77555-0656, Texas, USA

    Iwona Kubacka & Neil Howell

  3. Department of Neurology, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK

    Patrick F. Chinnery, Robert N. Lightowlers & Douglass M. Turnbull

Authors
  1. Richard M. Andrews
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iwona Kubacka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick F. Chinnery
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert N. Lightowlers
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Douglass M. Turnbull
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Neil Howell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglass M. Turnbull.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, R., Kubacka, I., Chinnery, P. et al. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat Genet 23, 147 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/13779

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/13779

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing