User talk:Cabayi
Add topic
|
Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment
[edit source]
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox settlement on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 20:31, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
Asdx49 again
[edit source]Back with another sock: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdx49 --Guy Macon (talk) 04:14, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
FYI, since you blocked the anon
[edit source]Is it possible this was just a logged out admin by accident? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Vandal_or_logged_out_admin_and_AFD_oddness — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- No. Consider tnis contribution and think about what happens when ~~~~ is parsed. Cabayi (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ohhhh. OK, I get it now. — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:58, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
Stop knowingly violating policies.
[edit source]Do you know better than to reintroduce false info to a page? Apparently not. You just did so. diff. Despite participating in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Advice_to_T-Mobile_IPv6_users#Challenge_reintroduction_of_false_info. Where the false info you would be introducing was itemized. Could you at least acknowledge that one should Preserve appropriate content? It is policy! Can you acknowledge that? {{helpme}} Admin Cabayi appears to be knowingly violating policy, as noted above.
- Can I get some help getting the behavior issue addressed?
- Can I get some help reversing the reintroduction of false info?
RememberOrwell (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'm an uninvolved editor, but I agree with Amanda that your revisions have made the page much harder to understand, especially due to the incorrect formatting/html syntax of your edits. If the previously mentioned issues are addressed, other editors may be more open to your revisions. I would also advise you to continue this discussion at the original location of Wikipedia talk:Advice to T-Mobile IPv6 users instead. This request for help template is mainly meant for your own talk page. FlammablePizza (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Also here as an uninvolved editor, but summoning people with the help request template and making sweeping claims that someone is violating policy usually better be backed up with good evidence - especially when I can see that this is nothing more than a content dispute, and not even one over an encyclopedia article. I'll also point out (as zzuuzz has already done so on the original talk page discussion) that not all of the "false info" you're complaining about is actually false - there's at least one point you're very wrong on. I'd advise you to take a step back and try to work collaboratively rather than screaming blue murder over a minor disagreement. stwalkerster (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
What?
[edit source]User:B.J was not doing harassment 🏏Cricket233r (Talk to the sixes). 16:33, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- How would you characterise a user who cautions 50 users who have done nothing wrong? After having been told already that users who have not edited this wiki are not bound by this wiki's username policy? Cabayi (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- he is suppose to warn users. Also those users are doing some thing wrong. Okay, Verity68 was doing the joke mod on talk pages. It was only one edit but a temp account was doing the exact same. 🏏Cricket233r (Talk to the sixes). 16:17, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
