close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 7;22(4):414.
doi: 10.3390/e22040414.

Entropy-Based GLDS Method for Social Capital Selection of a PPP Project with q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information

Affiliations

Entropy-Based GLDS Method for Social Capital Selection of a PPP Project with q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information

Li Liu et al. Entropy (Basel). .

Abstract

The social capital selection of a public-private-partnership (PPP) project could be regarded as a classical multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) issue. In this paper, based on the traditional gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method, the q-rung orthopair fuzzy entropy-based GLDS method was used to solve MAGDM problems. First, some basic theories related to the q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs) are briefly reviewed. Then, to fuse the q-rung orthopair fuzzy information effectively, the q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher weighting average (q-ROFHWA) operator and q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher weighting geometric (q-ROFHWG) operator based on the Hamacher operation laws are proposed. Moreover, to determine the attribute weights, the q-rung orthopair fuzzy entropy (q-ROFE) is proposed and some significant merits of it are discussed. Next, based on the q-ROFHWA operator, q-ROFE, and the traditional GLDS method, a MAGDM model with q-rung orthopair fuzzy information is built. In the end, a numerical example for social capital selection of PPP projects is provided to testify the proposed method and deliver a comparative analysis.

Keywords: GLDS model; entropy; multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM); public–private-partnership (PPP) projects; social capital selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Stojcic M., Zavadskas E.K., Pamucar D., Stevic Z., Mardani A. Application of MCDM Methods in Sustainability Engineering: A Literature Review 2008–2018. Symmetry. 2019;11:350. doi: 10.3390/sym11030350. - DOI
    1. Wang P., Wang J., Wei G.W., Wu J., Wei C., Wei Y. CODAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment. Informatica. 2020;31:161–184. doi: 10.15388/20-INFOR399. - DOI
    1. Gao H., Zhang H., Liu P. Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Power Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators in the Framework of Dempster-Shafer Theory. Symmetry. 2019;11:807. doi: 10.3390/sym11060807. - DOI
    1. Çam Ö.N., Sezen H.K. Linear programming formulation for vehicle routing problem which is minimized idle time. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2020;3:22–29. doi: 10.31181/dmame2003132h. - DOI
    1. Lei F., Wei G.W., Gao H., Wu J., Wei C. TOPSIS Method for Developing Supplier Selection with Probabilistic Linguistic Information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2020;22:749–759. doi: 10.1007/s40815-019-00797-6. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources