Abstract
Although screening mammography is widely used for the detection of breast tumors, it is difficult for a radiologist to interpret correctly a mammogram. It is possible to improve this task by using a computer aided diagnosis system (CAD) which highlights the areas most likely to contain cancer cells. In this paper, we present and compare five different feature extraction methods for breast cancer detection in digitized mammograms. All the methods are based on features extracted from a local window and on a k-nearest neighbor classifier with fast search.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arya, S., et al.: An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching. Journal of the ACM 45, 891–923 (1998)
Bovis, K.J., Singh, S.: Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), vol. 2, pp. 2267–2270 (2000)
Te Brake, G.M., Karssemeijer, N.: Comparison of three mass detection methods. In: Digital Mammography, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 119–126. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)
Campanini, R., Bazzani, A., et al.: A novel approach to mass detection in digital mammography based on support vector machines (svm). In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM), Bremen, Germany, pp. 399–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Chen, C., Daponte, J., Fox, M.: Fractal feature analysis and classification in medical imaging (1989)
Christoyianni, I., Koutras, A., et al.: Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 26, 309–319 (2002)
Diyana, W.M., Larcher, J., Besar, R.: A comparison of clustered microcalcifications automated detection methods in digital mammogram. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hong Kong, pp. 385–388 (2003)
Duda, R., Hart, P.: Pattern Recognition and Scene Analysis. John Wiley, New York (1973)
Rowley, H.A., Baluja, S., et al.: Neural network-based face detection. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 20(1), 23–38 (1998)
Haralick, R.M., et al.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. SMC 3(6), 610–621 (1973)
Heath, M.D., Bowyer, K.W.: Mass detection by relative image intensity. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM-2000), pp. 219–225. Medical Physics Publishing (2000)
Insana, M., et al.: Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized rician statistics. Opt. Eng. 25, 743–748 (1986)
Lado, M.J., Tahoces, P.G., et al.: Evaluation of an automated wavelet-based system dedicated to the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med. Inform. In Med. 26, 149–163 (2001)
Landeweerd, G., Gelsema, E.: The use of nuclear texture parameters in the automatic analysis of leukocytes. Pattern Recognition 10, 57–61 (1978)
Llobet, R., Perez-Cortes, J.C.: Breast cancer detection in digitized mammograms using non-parametric methods. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Signal and Information Processing (MEDSIP), Sliema, Malta, vol. 1, pp. 281–287 (2004)
Llobet, R., Toselli, A.H., Perez-Cortes, J.C., Juan, A.: Computer-aided prostate cancer detection in ultrasonographic images. In: Proceedings of the 1st Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA), Puerto de Andratx (Mallorca, Spain), vol. 1, pp. 411–419 (2003)
Perez-Cortes, J.C., Arlandis, J., Llobet, R.: Fast and accurate handwritten character recognition using approximate nearest neighbours search on large databases. In: Amin, A., Pudil, P., Ferri, F., Iñesta, J.M. (eds.) SPR 2000 and SSPR 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1876, pp. 767–776. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Suckling, J., Parker, J., et al.: The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378 (1994)
te Brake, G.M., Karssemeijer, N.: Automated detection of breast carcinomas that were not detected in a screening program. Radiology 207, 465–471 (1998)
Wallis, M., Walsh, M., et al.: A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin. Radiol. 44, 13–15 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Llobet, R., Paredes, R., Pérez-Cortés, J.C. (2005). Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Breast Cancer Detection. In: Marques, J.S., Pérez de la Blanca, N., Pina, P. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. IbPRIA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3523. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11492542_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11492542_61
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26154-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32238-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings Computer Science
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.