close
Skip to main content

Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Breast Cancer Detection

  • Conference paper
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 3523))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1858 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

Although screening mammography is widely used for the detection of breast tumors, it is difficult for a radiologist to interpret correctly a mammogram. It is possible to improve this task by using a computer aided diagnosis system (CAD) which highlights the areas most likely to contain cancer cells. In this paper, we present and compare five different feature extraction methods for breast cancer detection in digitized mammograms. All the methods are based on features extracted from a local window and on a k-nearest neighbor classifier with fast search.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arya, S., et al.: An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching. Journal of the ACM 45, 891–923 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bovis, K.J., Singh, S.: Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), vol. 2, pp. 2267–2270 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Te Brake, G.M., Karssemeijer, N.: Comparison of three mass detection methods. In: Digital Mammography, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 119–126. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campanini, R., Bazzani, A., et al.: A novel approach to mass detection in digital mammography based on support vector machines (svm). In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM), Bremen, Germany, pp. 399–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C., Daponte, J., Fox, M.: Fractal feature analysis and classification in medical imaging (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christoyianni, I., Koutras, A., et al.: Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 26, 309–319 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diyana, W.M., Larcher, J., Besar, R.: A comparison of clustered microcalcifications automated detection methods in digital mammogram. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hong Kong, pp. 385–388 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duda, R., Hart, P.: Pattern Recognition and Scene Analysis. John Wiley, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rowley, H.A., Baluja, S., et al.: Neural network-based face detection. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 20(1), 23–38 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haralick, R.M., et al.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. SMC 3(6), 610–621 (1973)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Heath, M.D., Bowyer, K.W.: Mass detection by relative image intensity. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM-2000), pp. 219–225. Medical Physics Publishing (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Insana, M., et al.: Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized rician statistics. Opt. Eng. 25, 743–748 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lado, M.J., Tahoces, P.G., et al.: Evaluation of an automated wavelet-based system dedicated to the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med. Inform. In Med. 26, 149–163 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Landeweerd, G., Gelsema, E.: The use of nuclear texture parameters in the automatic analysis of leukocytes. Pattern Recognition 10, 57–61 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Llobet, R., Perez-Cortes, J.C.: Breast cancer detection in digitized mammograms using non-parametric methods. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Signal and Information Processing (MEDSIP), Sliema, Malta, vol. 1, pp. 281–287 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Llobet, R., Toselli, A.H., Perez-Cortes, J.C., Juan, A.: Computer-aided prostate cancer detection in ultrasonographic images. In: Proceedings of the 1st Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA), Puerto de Andratx (Mallorca, Spain), vol. 1, pp. 411–419 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perez-Cortes, J.C., Arlandis, J., Llobet, R.: Fast and accurate handwritten character recognition using approximate nearest neighbours search on large databases. In: Amin, A., Pudil, P., Ferri, F., Iñesta, J.M. (eds.) SPR 2000 and SSPR 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1876, pp. 767–776. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Suckling, J., Parker, J., et al.: The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. te Brake, G.M., Karssemeijer, N.: Automated detection of breast carcinomas that were not detected in a screening program. Radiology 207, 465–471 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wallis, M., Walsh, M., et al.: A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin. Radiol. 44, 13–15 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Llobet, R., Paredes, R., Pérez-Cortés, J.C. (2005). Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Breast Cancer Detection. In: Marques, J.S., Pérez de la Blanca, N., Pina, P. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. IbPRIA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3523. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11492542_61

Download citation

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics