Abstract
Purpose
Reliable and accurate 2D/3D registration is essential for image-guided navigation and surgical robotics, enabling precise spatial alignment. This work investigates uncertainty quantification and characterization, addressing challenges specific to 2D/3D registration. Despite a few degrees of freedom (DoF), uncertainty in 2D/3D registration is difficult to estimate and interpret since it lacks the dimensional consistency in 2D/2D or 3D/3D registration.
Methods
We model 2D/3D registration as a Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation over the posterior distribution of 3D object poses given 2D fluoroscopic images. Uncertainty is quantified by sampling from an approximate posterior distribution, derived from a similarity function-based likelihood and a prior over the 6DoF pose space, and computing summary statistics and entropy measures from these samples. To characterize this approach, we generate plausible 2D/3D pelvis registrations and conduct experiments to investigate the relationship between uncertainty metrics and registration error.
Results
Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, a linear model, failed to capture the relationship between uncertainty metrics and registration error (R-squared = 0.023), while XGBoost provided a significantly better fit (R-squared = 0.85). A paired t-test revealed significant differences in prediction accuracy across registration error groups. XGBoost, fit on registrations closer to the correct solution, showed stronger predictive accuracy than the “global" model, which included the full range of errors, and the importance of uncertainty metrics differed between the two models.
Conclusion
This work presents a novel method for uncertainty quantification and characterization in single-view 2D/3D registration. Our results reveal a nonlinear relationship between uncertainty and registration accuracy, with stronger correlations observed in low-error regimes. These insights offer a foundation for better understanding and improving registration reliability in image-guided interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zou K, Chen Z, Yuan X, Shen X, Wang M, Fu H (2023) A review of uncertainty estimation and its application in medical imaging. Meta-Radiology, 100003
Unberath M, Gao C, Hu Y, Judish M, Taylor RH, Armand M, Grupp R (2021) The impact of machine learning on 2d/3d registration for image-guided interventions: A systematic review and perspective. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8:716007
Luo, J., Sedghi, A., Popuri, K., Cobzas, D., Zhang, M., Preiswerk, F., Toews, M., Golby, A., Sugiyama, M., Wells, W.M., et al.: On the applicability of registration uncertainty. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2019: 22nd International Conference, Shenzhen, China, October 13–17, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 22, pp. 410–419 (2019). Springer
Markelj P, Tomaževič D, Likar B, Pernuš F (2012) A review of 3d/2d registration methods for image-guided interventions. Medical image analysis 16(3):642–661
Risholm P, Janoos F, Norton I, Golby AJ, Wells WM III (2013) Bayesian characterization of uncertainty in intra-subject non-rigid registration. Medical image analysis 17(5):538–555
Schultz S, Handels H, Ehrhardt J (2018) A multilevel markov chain monte carlo approach for uncertainty quantification in deformable registration. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing, vol. 10574, pp. 162–169. SPIE
Grupp RB (2020) Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation for orthopaedic surgery. PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University
Huang, L., Ruan, S., Xing, Y., Feng, M.: A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methods. Medical Image Analysis, 103223 (2024)
Le Folgoc L, Delingette H, Criminisi A, Ayache N (2016) Quantifying registration uncertainty with sparse bayesian modelling. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 36(2):607–617
Yang X, Kwitt R, Styner M, Niethammer M (2017) Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration-a deep learning approach. NeuroImage 158:378–396
Dalca AV, Balakrishnan G, Guttag J, Sabuncu MR (2019) Unsupervised learning of probabilistic diffeomorphic registration for images and surfaces. Medical image analysis 57:226–236
Cho SM, Grupp RB, Gomez C, Gupta I, Armand M, Osgood G, Taylor RH, Unberath M (2023) Visualization in 2d/3d registration matters for assuring technology-assisted image-guided surgery. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 18(6):1017–1024
Cho SM, Taylor RH, Unberath M (2024) Misjudging the machine: Gaze may forecast human-machine team performance in surgery. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 401–410. Springer
Hu Y, Bonmati E, Gibson E, Hipwell JH, Hawkes DJ, Bandula S, Pereira SP, Barratt DC (2016) 2d-3d registration accuracy estimation for optimised planning of image-guided pancreatobiliary interventions. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Athens, Greece, October 17-21, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 19, pp. 516–524. Springer
Shams R, Xiao Y, Hébert F, Abramowitz M, Brooks R, Rivaz H (2017) Assessment of rigid registration quality measures in ultrasound-guided radiotherapy. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 37(2):428–437
Grupp RB, Unberath M, Gao C, Hegeman RA, Murphy RJ, Alexander CP, Otake Y, McArthur BA, Armand M, Taylor RH (2020) Automatic annotation of hip anatomy in fluoroscopy for robust and efficient 2d/3d registration. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 15:759–769
Grupp R, Unberath M, Gao C, Hegeman R, Murphy R, Alexander C, Otake Y, McArthur B, Armand M, Taylor R (2020) Data and code associated with the publication: Automatic Annotation of Hip Anatomy in Fluoroscopy for Robust and Efficient 2D/3D Registration. Johns Hopkins Research Data Repository . https://doi.org/10.7281/T1/IFSXNV
Grupp RB, Armand M, Taylor RH (2018) Patch-based image similarity for intraoperative 2d/3d pelvis registration during periacetabular osteotomy. In: OR 2.0 Context-Aware Operating Theaters, Computer Assisted Robotic Endoscopy, Clinical Image-Based Procedures, and Skin Image Analysis: First International Workshop, OR 2.0 2018, 5th International Workshop, CARE 2018, 7th International Workshop, CLIP 2018, Third International Workshop, ISIC 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 16 and 20, 2018, Proceedings 5, pp. 153–163. Springer
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, S.M., Do, A., Grupp, R. et al. Uncertainty Quantification in Image-based 2D/3D Registration and Its Relationship with Accuracy. Int J CARS 20, 1521–1529 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03417-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03417-x
