close
Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257913

Postcranial osteology of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus (Theropoda: Therizinosauria)

Chun-Chi Liao 1,2,3, Lindsay E Zanno 4,5, Shiying Wang 1,2,3, Xing Xu 1,2,*
Editor: Ulrich Joger6
PMCID: PMC8483305  PMID: 34591927

Abstract

Beipiaosaurus inexpectus, from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation (Sihetun locality, near Beipiao), Liaoning, China, is a key taxon for understanding the early evolution of therizinosaurians. Since initial publication in 1999, only the cranial elements of this taxon have been described in detail. Here we present a detailed description of the postcranial skeletal anatomy of the holotype specimen of B. inexpectus, including two never before described dorsal vertebrae from the anterior half of the series. Based on these observations, and comparisons with the postcranial skeleton of therizinosaurian taxa named since the most recent diagnosis, we revised the diagnostic features for B. inexpectus adding three new possible autapomorphies (PII-3 shorter than PIII-4, subequal length of the pre- and postacetabular portions of the ilium, and equidimensional pubic peduncle of ilium). Additionally, we also propose three possible synapomorphies for more inclusive taxa (Therizinosauroidea and Therizinosauridae) and discuss implications for evolutionary trends within Therizinosauria. The newly acquired data from the postcranial osteology of the holotype specimen of B. inexpectus sheds light on our understanding of postcranial skeletal evolution and identification of therizinosaurians.

Introduction

Therizinosaurus were a rare and bizarre clade of maniraptoran dinosaurs. Late-branching taxa possessed characteristic features such as a rostrally endentulous snout, dentary with a lateral shelf, small tightly packed lanceolate teeth, diminutive skulls, elongate neck, extremely broad and opisthopubic pelvis, shortened tibia, and tetradactyl pes [13]. Skeletal remains have been discovered from Cretaceous strata of Asia and North America [48], although Eshanosaurus deguchiianus from the Lufeng Formation, Yunnan, China might represent an Early Jurassic therizinosaurian [9, 10].

Beipiaosaurus inexpectus is an early-branching therizinosaurian from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation in Liaoning, China. As one of the earliest-branching members of the clade, the discovery of this taxon was key for disentangling the broader phylogenetic relationships of therizinosaurians. Particularly, because it lacks many features in late-branching members of the clade that are convergent with sauropodomorphan dinosaurs such as a tetradactyl pes and broad proximal first metatarsal as well as providing direct evidence of the presence of filamentous feathers in this clade [8]. Despite the significance of B. inexpectus for disentangling early anatomical evolution in the clade, detailed morphological descriptions are restricted to the cranial elements, select elements of the appendicular skeleton, the “pygostyle,” and a unique type of feathers called elongated broad filamentous feathers (EBFFs) [8, 1113]). A detailed description of the postcranial skeleton of the specimen is needed to further understand this important taxon. Here we present such a description of the postcranial skeletal osteology of the holotype specimen (IVPP V11559) in order to fill in new anatomical information on this key taxon and shed light on the evolution of the postcranial skeleton within Therizinosauria.

Methods

We follow the phylogenetic terminology and definitions of Zanno [3] for Therizinosauria, Therizinosauroidea, and Therizinosauridae. In contrast to most paleontological literature, we identify the three tetanuran manual digits as II-III-IV following the ornithological literature and some recent paleontological studies in light of avian digit homology research [14, 15]. Photography of B. inexpectus was performed in the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology. In each figure, the matrix and neighbouring bones were recolored to highlight the bone in Adobe Photoshop CC 2018. No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.

Institutional abbreviations

IVPP, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China.

Systematic paleontology

  • Dinosauria Owen, 1842

  • Theropoda Marsh, 1881

  • Coelurosauria sensu Gauthier, 1986

  • Therizinosauria Russell, 1997

  • Therizinosauroidea Russell and Dong, 1993

  • Beipiaosaurus inexpectus Xu, Wang et Tang, 1999

Holotype IVPP V11559, a partial, semi-articulated skeleton including some cranial elements and most of the postcranial elements. (Note: After Beipiaosaurus inexpectus was named in 1999, additional materials of the holotype [IVPP V11559] were collected from the type locality [11]. The holotype specimen thus comprises more skeletal elements than listed in the first description.)

Type locality and horizon Sihetun locality near Beipiao, Liaoning, China. Lower Cretaceous (Aptian) Yixian Formation [16].

Revised diagnosis

A small therizinosaurian possessing the following autapomorphies among Therizinosauria (newly added features noted with an asterisk*): postorbital process of frontal large and abruptly transits from orbital rim [13]; parietal with a long and sharp anterior process [13]; ventral ramus of parietal squamosal process extremely long [13]; and external mandibular fenestra deep dorsoventrally and extremely posteriorly located [13]; four fused caudal dorsals [3]; pygostyle incorporating up to seven caudal vertebrae [3]; “rectangular buttress” on MCII expressed as a triangular flange [3]; elongate lateral articular surface on manual phalanx II-1 [8]; manual ungual of digit II shorter than digit III*; subequal length of pre- and post-acetabular process of ilium*; equidimensional pubic peduncle of ilium (anteroposterior width subequal to mediolateral width)*; obturator process of ischium sinusoidal, with ventrally deflected distal portion [3]; ischial boot approximately twice anteroposterior depth of distal shaft [3]; low ridge on anterior femoral shaft extending proximally from medial condyle [3].

Description and comparisons

IVPP V 11559 is considered a skeletally immature individual because of the lack of fusion in the non-cranial axial skeleton including cervical vertebrae and corresponding cervical ribs, dorsal, sacral, and most caudal vertebral centra and their corresponding neural spines (except for posterior caudals) [17, 18]. Postcranial skeletal elements that variably fuse during ontogeny in theropods such as the ipsilateral scapula and coracoid, distal carpals II and III (known to at least partially fuse later in ontogeny in Falcarius; [19], and the distal tarsals and tibia are also unfused.

Axial skeleton

IVPP V11559 preserves four cervical, six dorsal, three sacral, and 30 caudal vertebrae (Figs 13 and Table 1). Most therizinosaurians except Jianchangosaurus and Nanshiungosaurus are represented by incomplete presacral vertebral columns [3, 20, 21]. There are 10 cervicals, 12 dorsals, and five sacrals in Jianchangosaurus [20] and 11 cervicals, 10 dorsals, and five sacrals in Nanshiungosaurus [22], although a more recent study suggests that Nanshiungosaurus (‘brevispinus’, NIGP V4731) has six sacrals [3].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Cervical vertebrae of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) in dorsal view; A. digitally enhanced photograph; B. interpretive line drawing. Abbreviations: cn, centrum; epi, epipophyses; le, ligamentum elastici; ifpr, infraprezygapophyseal lamina; inpo, interpostzygapophyseal lamina; ns, neural spine; PCV1-3, posterior cervical vertebrae 1–3; poz, postzygapophyses; prz, prezygapophyses. Scale bar equal 2 cm.

Fig 3. Photographs of sacral and anterior caudal vertebrae of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559).

Fig 3

Abbreviations: cn, centrum; cdv1-2, caudal vertebrate 1–2; ns, neural spine; sv, sacral vertebrate; sr, sacral rib. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Table 1. Measurements in millimeters of vertebrae of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559).

Cervical vertebrae (Fig 1) Width, maximum Length, maximum
Posterior cervical 1 - -
Posterior cervical 2 - -
Posterior cervical 3 - 46.3
Posterior cervical 4 - -
Dorsal vertebrae (Fig 2) Length, maximum Hight, maximum
Antero-middle dorsal (Fig 2A) 44.0 47.2
Middle dorsal (Fig 2B) - -
Posterior dorsal 1 44.9 -
Posterior dorsal 2 40.9 -
Posterior dorsal 3 37.8 -
Posterior dorsal 4 37.1 -
Sacral vertebrae (Fig 3)
Antepenultimate sacral 38.6 -
Penultimate sacral 36.7 -
Posteriormost sacral 32.2 -
Anterior to middle caudal vertebrae (Figs 3 and 4A)
1 31.8 -
2 31.9 62.4
3 - -
4 - -
5 - -
6 - -
7 34.2 39.8
8 33.1 40.1
9 33.1 39.7
10 33.6 37.6
11 33.0 -
Posterior caudal vertebrae (Fig 4B)
Posterior caudal 1 - -
Posterior caudal 2 27.1 23.5
Posterior caudal 3 26.5 25.3
Posteriormost caudal vertebrae (Fig 4D)
Posteriormost caudal 1 17.7 12.6
Posteriormost caudal 2 16.6 13.7
Posteriormost caudal 3 15.4 12.1
Posteriormost caudal 4 14.3 10.9
Posteriormost caudal 5 12.2 10.9
Posteriormost caudal 6 10.8 8.6
Posteriormost caudal 7 8.9 9.5
Posteriormost caudal 8 5.5 7.1
Posteriormost caudal 9 6.3 5.6
Posteriormost caudal 10 - 4.4
Posteriormost caudal 11 - -
Posteriormost caudal 12 3.0 -
Posteriormost caudal 13 2.1 3.6

Cervicals

Four incomplete cervical vertebrae are present, exposed in dorsal and lateral view (Fig 1A and 1B), and all of them are poorly preserved. Given that these cervical vertebrae are not elongate, they likely derive from the posterior cervical series. The total number of cervicals for B. inexpectus is unknown, but based on the closely related taxa Beipiaosaurus sp. (STM 31–1) [12] and Jianchangosaurus [20], we estimate around nine or 10. The later-branching therizinosaurians, ‘Nanshiungosaurus’ bohlini [22] and Neimongosaurus [23]), have 11–12 and 14 cervicals, respectively. An elongate neck with more than 10 cervicals is also seen in closely related oviraptorosaurians such as Caudipteryx, Citipati, and Khaan [24, 25].

In dorsal view, the neural arch is wider than its corresponding centrum, and both the pre- and postzygapophyses are lateral to the centrum, as in other therizinosaurs [19, 23, 26]. The neural spines of the cervicals are extremely low, anteroposteriorly short [8], and mediolaterally compressed with a straight dorsal border, in lateral view. Low and undeveloped cervical neural spines are a characteristic trait observed in many other therizinosaurians, such as Nothronychus [27], Neimongosaurus [23], Jianchangosaurus [20], and Falcarius [19]. The neural spine is centered on the neural arch, making an ‘X’-shape in dorsal view.

The articular surfaces of the postzygapophyseal facets face ventrally and are rounded. The prezygapophyses are robust and bear oval-shaped articular surfaces, similar to Jianchangosaurus [20]. In dorsal view, there is an intraprezygapophyseal lamina between the prezygapophyses, which only reaches the posterior margin of the articular facets. Between the postzygapophysis, there is a web of bone connecting the two parts called the intrapostzygapophyseal lamina (sensu Wilson, 1999 [28]), which is seen in other therizinosaurians such as Falcarius and Neimongosaurus, and is present on a broad distribution of coelurosaurs including ornithomimids, dromaeosaurs, troodontids, and oviraptorosaurs [19]. This lamina restricted the ligamentum elastici to a small fossa at the base of the neural spine (the interspinous fossa). As in Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus, there are prominent epipophyses above the postzygapophysis [19, 20].

The cervical centra of B. inexpectus are amphicoelous. Most therizinosaurians have amphicoelous cervical centra (e.g., Falcarius [19]; Martharaptor [29]; Jianchangosaurus [20]; Neimongosaurus [23]; and Nothronychus [27]); or amphiplatyan centra (Alxasaurus [6]; and ‘Nanshiungosaurus’ bohlini, [30]). The preserved third posterior cervical centrum is only slightly longer than the longest preserved posterior dorsal centrum (3%). However, despite shortening of the cervical centra posteriorly, all cervical centra remain anteroposteriorly longer than the preserved dorsal centra in B. inexpectus, as in other therizinosaurs. In Neimongosaurus, the penultimate cervical centrum is 17% longer than the longest dorsal centrum [23], and it is 25% and 12.5% longer in larger and smaller individuals, respectively in Alxasaurus [6].

Ribs are not fused to posterior cervicals, an ontogenetically variable feature that might strictly reflect the early ontogenetic stage of B. inexpectus. This condition is also seen in Jianchangosaurus [20] and B. sp. [12]. Cervical ribs are slender and long, longer than corresponding centra. Ribs elongation is shared with B. sp. [12] and Jianchangosaurus [20], but contrasts with Neimongosaurus [23] and Alxasaurus [6], which bear short and broad cervical ribs.

Dorsals

Six dorsals are preserved, four of them are preserved in articulation and exposed in lateral view (Fig 2C). These vertebrae were figured in Xu et al. ([8], Fig 1). The remaining two preserved dorsal vertebrae are preserved in anterolateral and lateral view (Fig 2A and 2B) and were discovered isolated along with additional materials of the holotype specimen and published in Xu et al. [11]. The four articulated dorsals are interpreted as deriving from the posterior portion of the series, and the isolated two dorsals are interpreted as deriving from the anterior to middle portion.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Photographs of the dorsal vertebrae of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. antero-middle dorsal in lateral view; B. middle dorsal in anterolateral view; C. posterior dorsals in lateral view. Abbreviations: cn, centrum; D. ld, lateral depression of dorsals; nc, neural canal; ns, neural spine; pd, pneumatic depression; PDV1-4, posterior dorsal vertebrae 1–4; podl, postzygadiapophyseal lamina; poz, postzygapophyses; prdl, prezygadiapophyseal lamina; prz, prezygapophyses; tp, transverse process. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Neural sutures appear to be at least partially fused in the more middle dorsals (Fig 2A and 2B). The one preserved in lateral view is interpreted as an antero-middle dorsal based on its lamination, the low neural spine, arched postzygapophyses, and the longer centrum (Fig 2A). The lamina and fossa system are developed, yielding pre- and postzygadiapophyseal laminae. The well-developed lamina and fossa system is also a feature that can be seen in many therizinosaurians, including Falcarius [19], Jianchangosaurus [20], Lingyuanosaurus [21], Shuzhousaurus [30], Alxasaurus [6], Neimongosaurus [23], and Nanshiungosaurus [22]. In lateral view, the centrum is sub-rectangular in shape, and the ventral border is concave slightly, making the articular facets relatively expanded dorsoventrally. There is a depression on the lateral surface, positioned under the transverse process. The same feature can also be seen in the posterior dorsals.

The vertebra preserved in anterolateral view is interpreted as a middle dorsal based on the height of the neural spine and upswept angle of the transverse processes (Fig 2B). The shape of the neural spine is gracile, and its dorsal surface is slightly expanded anteroposteriorly. In comparison with the antero-middle dorsal, the neural spine of this vertebra is dorsoventrally taller and approximately the same dorsoventral height as the centrum. In this respect, the neural spine of B. inexpectus is more similar to that of later-branching therizinosaurians such as Nothronychus [31], Alxasaurus [6], ‘Nanshiungosaurusbohlini [22], Neimongosaurus [23], and Erliansaurus [32], which possess relatively taller neural spines. Whereas in other earlier-branching members such as Falcarius [19], Jianchangosaurus [20], and Lingyuanosaurus [21], dorsal neural spines are robust, anteroposteriorly broaden, and reduced in height. The neural canal in anterior view is pentagon-shaped and dorsoventrally tall. Parapophyses are not prominent, and are present as a depression on the anterior rim, flush with neural arch. In anterior view, the articular facets of the centra are oval in shape and dorsoventrally high. Articular facets are slightly concave, suggesting an amphicoelus condition.

Neural sutures are unfused in the preserved posterior dorsals (Fig 2C), and may also be incompletely fused in the more anterior dorsals (Fig 2A and 2B). The neural arches of the four articulated dorsals are crushed and the neural arch is exposed only in ventral view. The transverse processes are elongate (i.e., the mediolateral length of the transverse process is approximately equal to the dorsoventral height of the corresponding centrum). In ventral view, the transverse process narrows in mid-shaft and slightly expands anteroposteriorly at the distalmost point. Parapophyses are not prominent, and present as a depression on the anterior rim, flush with neural arch. Posterior dorsal centra are spool-shaped generally and subrectangular in lateral view, as in Falcarius [19] and Neimongosaurus [23]. Centra are apneumatic, but do bear a lateral depression.

Ribs of dorsals are incomplete. However, it can be observed that they are elongate, extremely slender, and subtriangular in cross-section (Fig 4C).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Photographs of axial skeleton elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. middle caudals in lateral view; B. posterior caudals in lateral view; C. proximal end of dorsal rib in lateral view; D. posterior caudals with pygostyle-like structure; E. close-up for pygostyle-like structure. Abbreviations: cn, centrum; cav3-11, caudal vertebrae 3–11; ch, chevron; cp, capitulum; ft, fusion tubercle; ns, neural spine; pcdv1-3, posterior caudal vertebrae 1–3; pmcdv 1–13, posteriormost caudal vertebrae 1–13; poz, postzygapophyses; prz, prezygapophyses; tb, tuberculum; tp, transverse process. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Sacrals

The total number of sacrals in B. inexpectus is currently unknown. The last three sacrals are preserved in the material found within the re-excavation. The antepenultimate and the penultimate sacrals are fused. However, the posteriormost centrum is separated. All of the sacral centra are preserved in ventral view with only the dextral sacral ribs attached (Fig 3). The centra of the posteriormost three sacrals are subrectanglar in lateral view, unlike the sacrals of Falcarius, which are strongly medially constricted producing an hourglass-like shape in ventral view [19]. The sacral ribs of the three posteriormost sacrals are oriented laterally and expand anteroposteriorly. They are robust and their length is subequal to the width of their centra.

Caudals

The majority of caudal vertebrae were recovered among the second set of materials published in 2003 (Figs 3 and 4A and 4B, 4D and 4E). These constitute a nearly complete tail with 30 caudals [11]. However, some caudal vertebrae are not preserved, thus the total number of caudals of B. inexpectus was more than 30. The early-branching therizinosaurian, Falcarius is estimated to have about 35 caudal vertebrae [19]. In later-branching therizinosaurians, such as Neimongosaurus [23] and Alxasaurus [6] an incomplete series of 22 and 21 caudals are preserved, respectively.

Most caudal vertebrae are transversely compressed and exposed in lateral view. All of the caudal centra are apneumatic, amphicoelous, and constricted medially and ventrally. The anterior caudal centra are relatively robust with a subequal height to length ratio. Caudal centra gradually become anteroposteriorly elongate, as in other early-branching therizinosaurians (e.g., Falcarius [19]), as well as theropods generally. This condition is different from that observed in late-branching therizinosaurians, such as Alxasaurus [6] and Northychus [31], which possess anteroposteriorly abbreviated distal caudals. Unlike in other portions of the vertebral column, the neural arches and centra are fused in the caudals.

Neural spines in the anterior portions of the caudal series are subequal to the height of centra and reduce in height posteriorly. On the preserved first through third neural spines, the neural spines are less anteroposteriorly expanded, slightly posterodorsally oriented, and possess a convex dorsal margin. The neural spines become more box-shaped in lateral view and also shorten in anteroposterior length, maintaining their relative proportions. Neural spines of mid-caudal vertebrae are more posteriorly positioned, becoming flush with the postzygapophysis (Fig 4A). Further posteriorly, neural spines are absent (Fig 4B).

The pre- and postzygapophyses are steeply elevated and posteriorly inclined, as in most theropods generally, but more prominently in therizinosaurians and oviraptorosaurians [3]. In anterior caudal vertebrae, the prezygapophyses are more robust with oval articulation facets, and gradually become more slender and tapering distally. Prezygapophyses are elongate, approximately half the length of the neural arch and longer than the postzygapophyses. Postzygapophyses are mostly crushed or not visible in anterior to mid-caudal vertebrae. In posterior vertebrae, the postzygapophyses remain relatively short. The transverse processes are mostly crushed or incomplete. When present, they reduce from anteroposteriorly elongate and dorsoventrally thin processes to only small tubercles at the base of the middle neural arches along the axis. Posteriorly, the transverse processes become more anteriorly positioned.

The five posteriormost caudal vertebrae are fused together in a pygostyle-like structure (Fig 4D and 4E) [11], with ventrally concave and dorsally convex margins, as well as a blunt posterior end. A prominent line of fusion is still visible between the anterior two centra on the “pygostyle,” whereas the last two caudal vertebrae are completely fused, and can only be distinguished by a well-developed tubercle (Fig 4E). The neural spines of these five caudals are fused, and the margins are obscured. The phylogenetic distribution of this feature in other therizinosaurians is currently unknown, because the posteriormost portion of the caudal series is not definitively preserved in other therizinosaurians. When compared to the pygostyle-like structures exhibited by oviraptorosaurs, the “pygostyle” of B. inexpectus appears morphologically more similar to that of birds, in being more co-ossified and possessing stronger dorsally curved axes [11, 33].

Chevrons

Some chevrons are preserved in articulation with the caudals; they are approximately the same length as the centra with which they once articulated (Fig 4A and 4B). The proximal articular facets are concave in dorsal view, with a more extended posterior process. The shafts of the chevrons are straight as in Neimongosaurus [23], but different from the morphology of Falcarius and Alxasaurus, which are posteriorly deflected. Some of them possess an anterior tuberosity [19].

Pectoral girdle

IVPP V11559 preserves the right scapula, both coracoids, and a partial furcula with its corresponding impression (Fig 5 and Table 2).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Photographs of pectoral girdle elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. coracoids; B. furcula; C. scapula. Abbreviations: bl, blade; cf, coracoid foramen; C. gf, glenoid fossa of coracoid; ct, coracoid tubercle; epi, epicleidium; S. gf, Glenoid fossa of scapula; S. d, depression of scapula. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Table 2. Measurements in millimeters of pectoral girdle and forelimb elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559).

Element Length Width Note
Scapula, right >194.5* 21.2** *Losing distalmost part and some part of blade in proximal end is broken
**Narrowest part
Coracoid - -
Furcula 84.8 -
Humerus, right >163.9* 47.0** *Distal end is broken and some midshaft is losing.
**Width is measured from humeral head to lateral side
Ulna, right - 13.4
Radius, right >120.5* 19.2 *Losing some midshaft
Distal carpal II 5.8 20.0
Distal carpal III, left 15.8 15.0
MCII, right 38.9 16.1
MCIII, right 77.3 13.7
MCIV, right 75.9 -
PII-1, right 63.6
PII-2, right 71.7
PIII-1, right 50.9
PIII-2, right 60.1
PIII-3, right 86.1
PIV-1 -
PIV-2 -
PIV-3, right 38.5
PIV-4 -

Furcula

A partial right epicleidium of the furcula and its exquisite impression are preserved. Together, these demonstrate that it is a widely arched bone with an oblate-shaped cross-section (Fig 5B) [8]. Although Xu et al. [8] noted the absence of the hypocleidium on the furcula of B. inexpectus, Zanno [19] suggested the incomplete impression of the furcula and poor development of this feature in other taxa (i.e., Falcarius, [2]; Nothronychus [31]), makes this absence uncertain. In therizinosaurians, only Neimingosaurus lacks the development of hypocleidium entirely to date [19, 23].

The intraclavicular angle of B. inexpectus is ~145 degrees, similar to that of Neimongosaurus, which is about 135 degrees [23, 31], and unlike that of Falcarius, which is more acute (~104 degrees [2]). The epicleidea of B. inexpectus is straight, not bowed at its termini. In general shape, the furcula of B. inexpectus most closely resembles that of Neimongosaurus [23], as opposed to Nothronychus and Falcarius, which display at least some lateral deflection of the epicleidal termini [19, 31]. The distal termini of B. inexpectus tapers to a point, as in Jianchangosaurus, and unlike in Neimongosaurus, which bears a robust epicleidium with blunt distal ends [23]. In general, the furculae of therizinosaurians including B. inexpectus, Falcarius, Nothronychus, and Neimongosaurus are gracile and V-shaped.

Coracoid

Both coracoids are preserved, yet incomplete. The right element is more complete than the left element (Fig 5A). The coracoids of B. inexpectus are subrectangular, which is a feature also seen in most other therizinosaurians and some maniraptoran theropods [8], except the coracoids of Jianchangosaurus, which are more similar to those of ornithomimosaurs in having a semicircular shape [20]. The anterior region is anteroposteriorly shortened and elongated dorsoventrally as in Falcarius [2], and unlike Neimongosaurus, in which the anterior portion is plate-like and deflected posteromedially [23]. The curvature is relatively continuous as in Falcarius [2], although not as strongly recurved, and unlike the hinge form in Neimongosaurus [23]. There is a pronounced, nearly crest-shaped coracoid tubercle [8] similar in form to Falcarius [19], that is best-preserved on the left coracoid, unlike the moderately developed coracoid tubercle in Alxasaurus [6]. As in Alxasaurus and Falcarius, the coracoid tubercle occurs close to the ventral margin of the glenoid [2, 6]. The coracoid comprises slightly more than half of the glenoid. This condition is intermediate between that of the early-branching Falcarius [2], in which the scapular portion is greater, and Neimongosaurus, in which the coracoid comprises about two-thirds of the glenoid [23]. Dorsal to the glenoid, there is a coracoid foramen, similar to that of Falcarius morphologically [2].

Scapula

A partial right scapula is preserved in medial view. There is damage to the proximal and distal ends (Fig 5C). The scapula and coracoid are not fused, which is a feature present in early-branching therizinosaurians, including Falcarius [2], Jianchangosaurus [20], Martharaptor [29], as well as some later-branching taxa, such as Nothronychus [27] and Erliansaurus [32]. In other late-branching therizinosaurians, including Suzhousaurus [30], Neimongosaurus [23], Segnosaurus [4], and Therizinosaurus, the scapula and coracoid are fused. However, since IVPP V 11559 is a skeletally immature individual, the unfused condition might be the result of early ontogenetic stage. The blade is long and slender, with a slight distal expansion. Expansion of the distal blade can also be observed in Falcarius [2], Alxasaurus [6], Neimongosaurus [23], and Erliansaurus [32]. The reverse condition, scapula blade tapering of the distal end, is noted for later-branching therizinosaurians, such as Nothronychus and Segnosaurus [2, 4, 26].

The cross-section of the proximal end of the blade is flat and thin, gradually decreasing in dorsoventral height. There is a depression that begins midway along the medial surface of the scapular blade on B. inexpectus. This feature may be enhanced by or entirely the result of crushing. Such a depression is absent on Falcarius, Neimongosaurus, and Erliansaurus. The cross-section of the proximal blade is subtriangular, as in Falcarius [2]; with the transversely wider ventral base formed by a ridge in the medial surface. The glenoid fossa is a kidney-shaped facet that spans both the scapula and coracoid. It is oriented posteroventrally, similar to the condition found in early-branching therizinosaurians such as Falcarius [2] and Jianchangosaurus [20], and unlike the glenoid of the relatively late-branching Neimongosaurus, and Nothronychus, which faces more laterally [23, 26].

Forelimb

Both forelimbs are preserved in IVPP V11559 and are relatively complete (Figs 6 and 7 and Table 2). Forelimbs are relatively longer than the short and stout hind limbs in B. inexpectus, a feature shared with many dromaeosaurids and early-branching avialans [8, 34]. This feature is also present in some other early-branching to intermediate therizinosaurians. For instance, the ratio of humerus to femur in other therizinosaurian dinosaurs is as follows: Jianchangosaurus 76.7%, Alxasaurus 67.6%, Erlianosaurus 66.7%, Neimongosaurus 60.7%, and Nothronychus 38.7% [6, 20, 23, 27, 32]. Although the humerus of B. inexpectus is incompletely preserved, it is at least more than 60% of the femur length (Tables 2 and 3).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Photographs of right forelimb elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. humerus in anterior view; B. radius and ulna; C. humerus distal end with radius; D. carpus and manus elements. Abbreviations: dc III-IV, distal carpal III-IV; ec, ectepicondyle; hh, humeral head; im, intermedium; int, internal tuberosity; MCII-IV, metacarpus II-IV; PII-1 to PIV-4, phalanges II-1 to IV-4; ra, radiale; r.r, right radius; r.u, right ulna; rc, radial condyles. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Fig 7.

Fig 7

Photographs of left forelimb elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. manus elements in lateral view; B. humerus distal end in posterior view; C. carpus and metacarpus; D. radius and ulna; E. manus elements in anterior view. Abbreviations: ec, ectepicondyle; dcII-IV, distal carpal II-IV; enc, entepicondyle; l.r, left radius; l.u, left ulna; im, intermedium; MCII-III, metacarpus II-III; PII-1 to PIV-4, phalanges II-1 to IV-4; pt, posterior tuberosity; ra, radiale; rc, radial condyles; uc, ulnar condyles. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Table 3. Measurements in millimeters of pelvic girdle and hindlimb elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559).

Element Total length Hight Note
Ilium, right >115.8 80.1* *From acetabulum
Pubis >233.3* *Losing distalmost boot part
Ischium >150.0* *Losing proximal end
Length Width, proximal Width, distal
Femur, right 275.8 92.1 56.1
Tibia, right 271.2 - 65.7
Length Width
Astragalus - 56.7
Calcaneum 32.5 20.3
MTI 31.4 12.6
MTII 96.5 25.3
MTIII 105.7 26.3
?PI-1 36.3
Pedal ungual 51.7

Humerus

Both humeri are preserved. The right one is complete and preserved in anterior view; however, its proximal and distal ends are separated (Fig 6A and 6B). Only the distal part of the left humerus, preserved in posterior view, remains (Fig 7B). The humerus is shorter than the scapula, and relatively straight. In early-branching therizinosaurians, (e.g., Falcarius), the humerus is slightly sigmoidal, more similar to that of oviraptorids and Deinonychus [2]. Whereas, in late-branching therizinosaurians, the humerus varies from relatively straight [5, 26] to strongly sigmoidal [2, 4].

There is a pointed internal tuberosity in the proximal end of the humerus, with a depression to separate the tuberosity and humeral head, which is also present in most therizinosaurians and Mononykus [8, 35]. This depression extends across the posterior aspect to the proximal surface [8], as in Neimongosaurus, Segnosaurus and Erlikosaurus, [2]. However, we note that poor preservation of the humerus suggests caution in interpreting the morphology of the internal tuberosity, humeral head, and depression separating these features. In most therizinosaurians, the humeral head is hypertrophied both posteriorly and dorsally, appearing bulbous in form [2], whereas in IVPP V11559, only the dorsal extension of the humeral head can only be confirmed due to the poor preservation. Only the base of the deltopectoral crest is preserved. It extended from the humeral shaft 90 degrees. By observing the broken scar, the deltopectoral crest should be about one-third of the humeral length, similar to the ratio of Falcarius, Jianchangosaurus, Neimongosaurus, and Erliansaurus [2, 20, 23, 32], and shorter in form than in Segnosaurus and Therizinosaurus [4, 5].

As in other early-branching therizinosaurians, the proximal and distal ends of humerus are moderately expanded, narrowest in mid-shaft [20]. The ulnar and radial condyles are positioned anteriorly as in most therizinosaurians [2, 8]. Close to the lateral surface of distal ends, there is a significant posterior tuberosity opposite the radial condyle. Next to the tuberosity and extending laterally is a dorsoventrally elongate ectepicondyle. The entepicondyle is hypertrophied and extends anterolaterally. On the posterior surface of the distal end, there is a ridge originating from the hypertrophied entepicondyle. Concordant with this ridge, there is a groove on the posterior surface closer to the medial side, which separates the condyles of the distal end.

Ulna

Both ulnae are partial and preserve the distal aspect. The left ulna is more complete including the posterior surface (Figs 6B and 7D). Although a proximal end of the right ulna was noted as being present by Xu, et al. [8], the element could not be found at the IVPP during this study. Based on the preserved portions, the ulna is estimated to be shorter than the humerus, as in most therizinosaurians. The ratio of the ulna to the humerus in early-branching therizinosaurians such as Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus is 77–78% [2, 20], and B. inexpectus might be close to this ratio. Among late-branching therizinosaurians the ratio of these elements ranges from 72% in Nothronychus [26] to as elongate as 85% in Erliansaurus [32]. The preserved parts and the impression show that the mid-shaft of the ulna is straight and not bowed, like in most other therizinosaurians such as Jianchangosaurus, Nothronychus, Erliansaurus, and Therizinosaurus [20, 26, 32], but different from that of Falcarius, which is bowed [2]. The cross-section of the ulnar shaft of Beipiaosaurus is oval medially, becoming flattened near the distal end and is semicircular in distal view. There is a prominent, medially projecting tubercle on the distal end, which is anteroposteriorly flattened, similar to Falcarius [2].

Radius

Both distal radii are preserved, along with the proximal end of the right radius (Figs 6B and 6C and 7D). Although the diameter of the radius is larger than the ulna, it is still gracile in shape. A gracile radius is also present in Falcarius, Jianchangosaurus, and Neimongosaurus [2, 20, 23]. The radii of later-branching therizinosaurians are more massive and robust [4, 5]. Based on the preserved parts and the impression, the radius of B. inexpectus is a relatively straight element, like Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus [2, 20]; whereas in Therizinosaurus and Neimongosaurus, this element is relatively sigmoidal [2, 4, 23]. The proximal end of the radius is oval and medially deflected to form the proximal fossa. The cross-section of the shaft is subcircular, becoming subtriangular and mediolaterally expanded approaching the distal end, which flattens medially to articulate with the distal ulna.

Carpus

Nine elements of the carpus are preserved. Present are distal carpals II, III, and IV, the intermedium, and the radiale of the left wrist, and distal carpal III and IV, the intermedium, and the radiale of the right wrist (Figs 6D and 7C and 7E).

The radiale of the left manus is V-shaped, with a depression on the proximal end, near the contact with the radius (Fig 7E; [8]). Positionally, the right radiale is also preserved near distal carpal III, and has a rod-like shape (Fig 6D), but the poor preservation hinders further identification and description. Both intermedia are preserved. Considering both of the elements, the intermedium of B. inexpectus is a flat and round element with a wedge-shaped, narrower end. Intermedia are either fragmented or not exposed well, so the articulation with the other carpals, and the precise morphology, are difficult to identify.

There are morphological and positional discrepancies in the preserved carpals that prevent us from confident identification of these elements. We present both hypotheses here.

If we identify the distal carpals by their preserved position relative to the metacarpals, the distal carpal II of B. inexpectus is large and oval [8], and it is unfused to distal carpal III. Whether this is related to ontogenetic stage is unclear. In Falcarius, distal carpals II and III are partially fused dorsally, and together these elements make up the semilunate [2]. The distal carpals of B. inexpectus differ from those of Alxasaurus, in which the distal carpal II is the largest [6]. In B. inexpectus, distal carpal III is larger than distal carpal II. Distal carpal III is slightly elongate and caps primarily the proximal surface of metacarpal III, and touches the proximal surface of metacarpal II [8]. In proximal view, distal carpal III is convex dorsally and ventrally, with a well-defined trochlear groove for the radiale. Although the semilunate (distal carpal III) is smaller and the anterior process is blunter and more reduced, the overall shape of it is identical to that of Deinonychus [8, 36]. In early-branching therizinosaurians such as Falcarius, the fused distal carpal II and III is larger and more robust than other therizinosaurians and dromaeosaurs [2].

However, we recognize a different possibility for the identifications of distal carpal II and III. Morphologically, it seems that the carpal element termed the “semilunate” in Xu et al. [8] and also labelled as “dc III” on our intext figures is most similar to the single carpal distal carpal II in Falcarius, and that the “semilunate” carpal structure would be comprised of both distal carpal II and distal carpal III in early branching therizinosaurs [2, 37]. Also, based on the size ratio of the distal carpals and the morphology of the “semilunate” (distal carpal III) in B. inexpectus, this element is more identical to that of the distal carpal II of Alxasaurus [6, 37]. In this case, it is highly possible that the positionally consistent distal carpal II and III are translocated during the preservation or the preparation, and they are actually distal carpals III and II, respectively.

The distal carpals IV are also incomplete on both manus. The distal carpus IV is a proximodistally thin element, and tapers on the lateral end giving it a subtriangular shape. The articular facet is slightly concave. Distal carpal IV is missing in other therizinosaurian taxa, so there is little else to support the identification of this element.

Manus

The manus of IVPP V11559 is relatively complete, and missing parts can be inferred from impressions (Figs 6D and 7A). In general, the manus of B. inexpectus is elongate and slender, with well-developed ginglymoid articulations and raptorial unguals. Digit IV is shorter than digit III.

Metacarpus

All the metacarpals of B. inexpectus are preserved, except for the left metacarpal IV, (Figs 6D and 7A). In general, metacarpal elements of B. inexpectus resembles to those of Falcarius [2].

Metacarpal II is the most robust and shortest of the metacarpals, only half the length of metacarpal III. The cross-section is subtriangular with a laterally flattened facet for articulation with metacarpal III. There is a concavity on the proximal surface of metacarpal II that extends to the dorsal surface between the medial process and the dorsal process, forming a notch. There are three processes on the proximal articular surface, which make a triradiate shape. This condition is also present in the early-branching therizinosaurian Falcarius [2]. Among the three processes, the medial process extends farthest to support the dorsomedial extension of distal carpal I. The same condition can also be seen in Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus [2, 20], but not as extremely as in Erliansaurus [32]. The lateroventral surface of the proximal end of metacarpal II is pointed and extends to underlie the base of metacarpal III; this is known as the “rectangular buttress”. This character was first described in Alxasaurus and as a synapomorphy for Therizinosauroidea [6]. Although this buttress is also present in the earlier-branching Falcarius, it is more moderate [2]. The distal end of metacarpal II is slightly broader and asymmetrical, with a more extensive lateral condyle and a medially rotated axis. This feature is also seen in Falcarius, Jichangosaurus, and Erliansarurus [2, 20, 32]. As in Falcarius and Therizinosaurus, the distal end of metacarpal II lacks collateral ligament pits and a dorsal extensor pit.

Metacarpal III is the longest of the metacarpals, and has transversely expanded and robust ends. The shaft is rectangular proximally and becomes oval and dorsoventrally flattened in the midshaft. The proximal articular surface is rectangular and convex, unlike the proximal articulation surface of metacarpal II, which is concave. Each margin of the rectangular proximal surface is divided by rounded tuberosities, and a dorsolateral tuberosity extends to overhang the proximal end of metacarpal IV. This morphology is similar to that of Falcarius [2]. The distal end of metacarpal III is asymmetrical, with a vertically oriented, rounded lateral condyle and a larger medial condyle that is angled outward. A larger medial condyle is also described in Falcarius and Erliansaurus, but in Falcarius it is less prominent [2, 32].

Metacarpal IV is only preserved on the right manus. By observing the impression, metacarpal IV can be inferred to be a thin, long, and straight element, more gracile than metacarpal II and metacarpal III. This character is similar to that of Faclarius morphologically [2]. The length of metacarpal IV is about 75% of Metacarpal III. The shaft of metacarpal IV is oval in cross-section. The proximal end of metacarpal IV is convex and subtriangular; whereas the distal end is slightly bowed toward metacarpal III.

Manual phalanges

The left arm of B. inexpectus is more complete than the right one. There are many missing and incomplete right phalanges, but clear impressions of these missing elements remain (Figs 6D and 7A). There are well-developed ligament pits on the lateral sides of distal ends. All the manual unguals are deep, compressed mediolaterally, and curved strongly [6, 8]. As in Falcarius, the collateral grooves of the manual unguals are not continuous with large depressions in the medial and lateral surface of the proximal aspect [2]. In Lingyuanosaurus and Jianchangosaurus these features connect [21]. Collateral grooves rise dorsally toward the distalmost tip, as in many other therizinosauroids, including Lingyuanosaurus, Alxasaurus, and Therizinosaurus [6, 21]. Manual unguals are subequal in length with the penultimate phalanges in B. inexpectus. Unlike, in the therizinosaurids Nothronychus and Therizinosaurus, in which the unguals are longer than the penultimate phalanges ([2], Fig 5; [31], Fig 1).

Digit II is the shortest of the three digits, but phalanx II-1 is the longest and the most robust phalanx. The same condition can also be seen in Jichangosaurus and Falcarius [2, 20]. The proximal articular surface of phalanx II-1 is subtriangular and taller than wide. Although the midshaft is missing, from the impression and the preserved distal shaft, it can be inferred that the midshaft is straight with a subcircular cross-section. The distal ginglymoid articular surface is symmetrical with a deep intercondylar groove, and the condyles are more extensive ventrally than dorsally. Collateral ligament pits are well developed and positioned more dorsally. The manual ungual of digit II of most therizinosaurians is the longest and largest including Jianchangosaurus [20], Alxasaurus [6], and Erliansaurus [32]. However, the manual ungual II of B. inexpectus is slightly shorter than manual ungual III, and it possesses the strongest degree of curvature. As in other early-branching therizinosaurians, B. inexpectus also possesses a deeper proximal articular surface and more massive flexor tubercle similar to that of oviraptorosaurians [2, 6, 32]. The flexor tubercle and the ventral margin of the proximal articular surface of phalanx II-2 are separated by a narrow and deep groove.

Digit III is the longest digit, phalanx III-1 is about 80% length of phalanx II-1, and phalanx III-2 is only slightly shorter than phalanx II-1. Phalanx III-1 is stout in shape, with a hexagonal proximal surface. In proximal view, the dorsal intercondylar tuberosity is less pronounced, but the ventral intercondylar tuberosity is relatively robust. On the distal end, collateral ligament pits are poorly developed and the pits are positioned nearly centered on the condyle. In phalanx III-2, the cross-section of the proximal end is oval, and dorsoventrally taller than wide. The shaft of phalanx III-2 of B. inexpectus is straight, and gradually tapers in dorsoventral height toward the distal end. Nonetheless, it remains taller than wide in cross-section. On the distal end of phalanx III-2, the intercondylar groove is deep, the condyles are taller than the height of the mid-shaft, and the collateral ligament pits are located more dorsally. These features of the distal end are characteristic of penultimate phalanges [2]. Manual ungual III is less re-curved than manual ungual II, but longer. A longer second claw is a character similar to that of Archaeopteryx and Protarchaeopteryx [8, 38]. The proximal articular surface and flexor tubercle of phalanx I-3 are divided by a broad and shallow notch. The flexor tubercle of manual ungual III is narrower and smoother than that of manual ungual II, and lacks the distal pits present in manual ungual II. On the tip of the left ungual III, there is a dorsoventrally flat extension that might represent preservation of the keratin sheath. If so, the claw sheath of B. inexpectus seems to be more flattened, rather than a sharply pointed structure, but this might be caused by taphonomic processes.

Digit IV is relatively gracile, with extremely shortened phalanges IV-1 and phalanx IV-2. When combined, the length of these two phalanges is equal to that of phalanx IV-3 [8]. Digit IV is in poor condition, most parts of phalanx IV-1 and phalanx IV-2 are missing, so it is difficult to observe any detailed structure. Phalanx IV-3 is relatively complete. The shape of phalanx IV-3 is gracile and elongate, with a mediolaterally narrow and oval cross-section. The collateral ligament pits of the distal end are well developed and located dorsally. Phalanx IV-4 is the smallest manual ungual of the three digits. The flexor tubercle, the groove that separates it from proximal joint surface, as well as the lateral sulci of phalanx IV-4, are the most poorly developed of any manual ungual.

Pelvic girdle

Pelvic girdle elements of IVPP V11559 reported in 1999 [8] include a partial ilium, pubis and ischium. Materials found during the re-excavation of the same quarry and reported in 2003 include a complete ilium and two incomplete ischia (Fig 8 and Table 3) [11]. B. inexpectus processes features such as a parallelogram-shaped ilium and propubic pelvis that are more primitive than the morphology of late-branching therizinosaurids [3, 8].

Fig 8.

Fig 8

Photographs of pelvic girdle elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. left ilium in medial view with pubis; B. partial ilium and ischium; C. right ilium in lateral view; D. right ischium in lateral view and left ischium in medial view. Abbreviations: ac, acetabulum; ant, antitrochanter; I.isp, ischiadic peduncle of ilium; I.pp, pubic peduncle of ilium; Is.ip, iliac peduncle of ischium; l.Il, left Ilium; l.Is, left ischium; op, obturator process; poa, postacetabular; pra, preacetabular; pran, preacetabular notch; Pu, pubis; r.Is, right ischium; ve, ventral extension. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Ilium

The left ilium of B. inexpectus is partially preserved and exposed in medial view (Fig 8A and 8B). The right ilium was found in the re-excavation. It is relatively complete and exposed in lateral view (Fig 7C). The ilium is parallelogram-like in shape, similar to that of dromaeosaurids and early-branching birds, but different from that of late-branching therizinosaurians, which have an ilium more similar in shape to sauropods [8, 39]. The length of the pre- and postacetabular portions of the ilium are subequal, as in many oviraptorosaurians and early-branching ornithomimosaurians [3, 8, 40, 41]. The relative proportion of the pre- and postacetabular aspects of the ilium is difficult to quantify in other therizinosaurians except for some taxa, such as Falcarius, for which the preacetabular portion is approximately 30% longer than the postacetabular portion. Nothronychus and Segnosaurus also possess longer preacetabular portions, but the ratio is not as extreme as in Falcarius [19, 31].

The preacetabular blades of therizinosaurians are dorsoventrally deep, dubbed the “altiliac” condition, and bear a pointed ventral extension. This extension is extreme in Lingyuanosaurus, Segnosaurus, and Nanshiungosaurus, extending ventral to the dorsal margin of acetabulum [3, 21, 42]. However, this character is less significant in B. inexpectus, in which case the ventral aspect of the preacetabular portion of the ilium only extends slightly ventral to the dorsal acetabulum [11]. Early-branching therizinosaurians such as Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus lack this feature [19, 20]. The preacetabular notch is considerably higher than the acetabulum as in other therizinosaurians including the early-branching Falcarius, but in theropods, the dorsal margin of the acetabulum is subhorizontal with the ventral aspect of the preacetabulum [19].

The supracetabular crest is relatively mediolaterally deep, and entirely capped the femoral head. The dorsoventral height of the postacetabular portion gradually reduces posteriorly in lateral view. It is subrectangular in shape, with a blunt posteroventral corner. This feature is already present in the earliest-branching therizinosaur Falcarius, and is a character of all therizinosaurians. The posteroventral aspect of the ilium is deflected laterally at a right angle to the vertical ramus. The brevis fossa is shallow, subcircular and oriented mediolaterally, which is similar to coelurosaurians generally [8, 43].

The pubic peduncle of B. inexpectus is longer than the ischiadic peduncle, as in therizinosaurians, dromaeosaurids, and Archaeopteryx [8, 43], but the length is subequal in earlier-branching therizinosaurians (e.g., Falcarius [19]). The pubic peduncle is equidimensional, unlike that of earlier-branching Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus, in which the anteroposterior length is as twice that of the mediolateral width; whereas in later-branching therizinosaurians, the mediolateral width is two or three times longer than the anteroposterior length ([19, 20], Fig 9). Beipiaosaurus inexpectus is intermediate between these values. The middle of the pubic peduncle is posteriorly concave, which is also seen in other late-branching therizinosauroids, including Lingyuanosaurus, Suzhousaurus, and Nanshiungosaurus [21, 22, 30]. The articular facet of the pubic peduncle is oriented anteroventrally, which when combined with the morphology of the proximal pubis creates an apropubic pelvis. The ischiadic peduncle is peg-like. These characters are similar to Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus [19, 20]. There is a prominent antitrochanter on the dorsolateral surface of the acetabulum, which rounds out the acetabulum in lateral view.

Pubis

Both pubes are preserved, lacking proximal and distal ends (Fig 8A). There is a slight curvature of the distal shaft creating a sigmoid shape. The shaft is anteroposteriorly compressed and drop-shaped in cross-section as in Falcarius [19], but different from that of other late-branching therizinosaurians including Alxasaurus, Segnosaurus, Nothronychus, and Shuzhousaurus, which have more transversely flattened shafts [8, 30, 31]. The pubic apron is compressed anteroposteriorly, and might have extended more than half the length of the shaft as in Falcarius [19], but due to the fact that both ends are missing, the proportions cannot be confidently calculated. The pubic boot in B. inexpectus is yet unknown. The ischial boot from the 2003 specimen was erroneously compared to the pubic boot of Falcarius in Zanno [19]; this error was subsequently corrected in Zanno [3].

Ischium

Two incomplete ischia are present, preserving the proximal portion of the right ischium and the shaft and distal portions of both the right and left ischia ([11], Fig 8D; [8], Fig 8B). The ischium is estimated to be subequal or slightly shorter than the pubis. The relative length of the ischium is shortest in Falcarius, which is only about 2/3 the length of the pubis; in Jianchangosaurus, the ischium is about 20% shorter; and in late-branching therizinosaurians, the length of these two elements are subequal [19, 20].

Ischia are slightly curved posteriorly and mediolaterally compressed. The lateral surface is slightly convex and the medial surface is flattened. The proximal portion is damaged, but bears a fan-shaped expansion in lateral view, and might be similar to Faclarius, which possesses a longer iliac peduncle than pubic peduncle [19].

On the anterior surface of the mid-shaft, closer to the proximal end, there is a prominent, dorsoventrally expanded obturator process. It is different from the condition of late-branching therizinosaurians, which have a hypertrophied and distally positioned obturator process [19, 20]. The distal point of the obturator process in B. inexpectus first projects anterodorsally and then anteroventrally, forming a sinusoidal process, unlike in Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus, in which it points anteriorly [19, 20]. The position of obturator process in B. inexpectus and Jianchangosaurus is relatively close to the mid-shaft, which is similar to that of tyrannosaurs and early-branching ornithomimosaurs [41, 44]. On Falcarius, the obturator process is positioned more distally, as in dromaeosaurs, troodontids, early-branching birds, and oviraptorosaurs [18, 19, 36, 40, 4550].

The distal end of the ischium bears a prominent, anteriorly expanded, and semicircular boot, in medial view. The anterior margin is relatively pointed and convex, and the posterior margin is round and blunt. A prominent distal ischial boot is different from that observed on Jianchangosarus, Alxasaurus, and Nothronychus, in which the boot is only expanded or thickened slightly [6, 20, 27].

Hindlimb

Only the right leg is preserved on IVPP V11559; it is relatively complete (Fig 9 and Table 3). Although Xu, Tang, and Wang [8] describe the tibia of IVPP V 11559 as being longer than the femur, our measurement shows that they are subequal in length and the femur is slightly longer (Table 3). The hindlimb of B. inexpectus is intermediate in morphology, including the relative ratios of the hind limb elements. The ratio of femur/tibia and metatarsus/tibia in therizinosaurians is as follows: Falcarius 91/45%, Jianchangosaurus 65/54%, B. inexpectus 101/39%, Nothronychus graffmi 104/35%, Neimongosaurus 118/37%, Erliansaurus 110%/unknown, and Segnosaurus 102/32% [8, 19, 20]. The ratio in B. inexpectus fits its phylogenetic position between earliest-branching taxa (Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus) and therizinosaurids.

Fig 9.

Fig 9

Photographs of hindlimb elements of B. inexpectus (IVPP V 11559) A. right femur in anterior view and tibia in posterior view; B. left tibia and fibula; C. right tarsus and pedal elements. Abbreviations: ap, ascending process; As, astragalus; asc, astragalus condyle; bo, body; Cal, calcaneum; Dt, distal tarsal; F. lc, lateral condyle of femur; F. mc, medial condyle of femur; fc, fibular crest; fh, femoral head; Fi, fibula; lm, lateral malleolus; lt, lesser trochanter; mct, medial crest; mm, medial malleolus; MT I-III, metatarsus I-III; ?PI-1 to ?PIV-3, ?phanlanges I-1 to IV-3; T.mc, medial condyle of tibia. Scale bars equal 2 cm.

Femur

The right femur is preserved and exposed in anterior view (Fig 9A). Both B. inexpectus and Falcarius possess relatively gracile femora that display a mosaic of late-branching maniraptoran and early-branching coelurosaurian features [19]. The femur of B. inexpectus is somewhat intermediate between the recurved condition of Falcarius and the early-branching straight femur of many other therizinosauroids, including Jianchangosaurus, Lingyuanosaurus, Erliansaurus, and Neimongosaurus [20, 21, 23, 32].

The femoral head of B. inexpectus in anterior view is perpendicular to the long axis of the shaft, similar to Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus [19, 20]. This feature is different from that of late-branching therizinosaurians, such as Lingyuanosaurus, Alxasaurus, and Nothronychus, which possess a dorsomedially rotated femoral head [6, 21, 31]. The femoral head is large and bears a distinctly rounded head and weakly constricted neck, similar to the condition in Jianchangosaurus, but different than in Falcarius and Lingyuanosaurus, which have a more distinct and constricted femoral neck [19, 21]. As in Falcarius and Jianchgosaurus, the femoral head of B. inexpectus is continuous with the greater trochanter. This is unlike the condition in late-branching therizinosaurians such as Lingyuanosaurus, Nothronychus, and Neimongosaurus, which have a depression between the femoral head and the greater trochanter in anterior view [1921]. This depression is not only present in late-branching therizinosaurians, but also in oviraptorosaurians and alvarezsaurs [19, 40, 51]. However, the absence of this feature in early-branching therizinosaurians indicates that it is not synapomorphic for these clades.

The lesser trochanter of B. inexpectus is wing-like and separated from the greater trochanter by a narrow and deep cleft, which is a character present in early-branching coelurosaurs [8, 19]. Both Falcarius and B. inexpectus possess an alariform lesser trochanter, but the shape is cylindrical in Alxasaurus and Jianchangosaurus, and even reduced in Alxasaurus [6, 19, 20]. The fourth trochanter projects from the posterior surface of the femur, with a ridge shape that is transversely thin and proximodistally long. The cross-section of the femoral shaft is subtriangular.

In anterior view there is a slight depression separating the medial condyle and the lateral condyle on the distal femur. In anterior and distal view, the distal condyles are asymmetrical, with a slightly larger and more extensive medial condyle than lateral condyle, which is opposite to that of Falcarius, which possesses a more extensive lateral condyle [19].

Tibia

Both tibiae are preserved, and the right tibia is relatively complete (Fig 9A and 9B). In general, the shape of the tibia of B. inexpectus is gracile and slender, with some proportions that are more primitive than those of late-branching therizinosaurians.

The posterior surface of the right tibia of B. inexpectus is exposed and bears an asymmetrical proximal end in posterior view. On the proximal end, the medial condyle is dorsally higher and positioned more proximally, which is similar to that of Falcarius [19]. This asymmetrical proximal end in Falcarius corresponds with the less extensive medial condyle of the femur. However, this is not the case for B. inexpectus because the medial condyle of the femur is more distally extensive.

The tibia has a relatively straight shaft and its cross-section changes from subtrangular proximally to anteroposteriorly flattened distally. Due to the preservation position, the lateral side of the right tibia cannot be observed, but in the partial left tibia, there is a prominent fibular crest extending to the mid-shaft. Although it is damaged, it can be determined that it is more developed than in Falcarius [19], and less developed than in late-branching therizinosaurians such as Nothronychus and Erliansaurus, which have fibular crests that extend distally to the mid-shaft [31, 32].

The distal articular facet of the tibia of B. inexpectus is anteroposteriorly narrow and transversely broad, with a blunt and robust medial condyle, similar to Falcarius. But the medial condyle of Falcarius is orientated anteromedially [19], whereas in B. inexpectus it is orientated medially. The lateral condyle is large and semicircular in shape to support the fibula.

Fibula

An incomplete left fibula is preserved, lacking the distal end (Fig 9B). In general, the fibula is much more slender and more gracile compared to tibia, especially the distal portion. The fibula of B. inexpectus lacks a medial fossa on the proximal portion, as in other therizinosaurians, oviraptorosaurians, and dromaeosaurs [19, 26, 52]. Similar to Alxasaurus and some avialans, the medial surface of fibula is relatively flattened [6, 8, 53].

Tarsus

The right astragalus, calcaneum and a distal tarsal are preserved and exposed in posterior view (Fig 9C). They are unfused with the distal tibia, proximal metatarsals, and with each other. Lack of fusion may be the result of ontogeny, but in Faclarius these elements are also not fused even in the largest individual [19]. As in other therizinosaurians, the astragalar condyle is reduced, so it only capped a portion of the distal end of the tibia. In Faclarius, the astragalus and the calcaneum are relatively larger and cap the distal tibia and fibula entirely [5, 8, 19, 31].

The astragalus consists of an asymmetrical and robust, saddle-shape body, with a significantly larger medial surface. In posterior view, the medial aspect is thick proximodistally, and gradually narrows laterally. This condition is shared between B. inexpectus and Falcarius [19]. However, reduction of the astragalar body in late-branching therizinosaurians causes this feature to be absent in late-branching members [19]. As in other therizinosaurians, B. inexpectus also possesses a tall ascending process. The ascending process and the medial margin of the body is inset, with the base of the ascending process rising vertically.

The calcaneum is sub-oval and disk-shaped [8], with a slightly convex surface on the medial side. According to Xu et al. ([8], Fig 2e), a single distal tarsal is present, which attaches to the proximal surface of metatarsal IV. However, this element can no longer be located.

Metatarsus

Five elements of the right metatarsus are preserved, and in relatively complete condition (Fig 9C) [8]. However, due to the position of preservation, only portions of these elements are exposed and can be observed. As in Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus, B. inexpectus has a typical functionally tridactyl, and relatively gracile pes, in contrast to late-branching therizinosaurians, which have a stout and tetradactyl pes [8, 19, 20]. The metatarsus of B. inexpectus is compact proximally and elongate in general (~39% the length of the tibia). This ratio is longer than other late-branching therizinosaurians but shorter than Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus, as well as most theropods, for this ratio is typically over 45% [6, 8, 19, 20].

Metatarsal I of B. inexpectus is relatively robust, with a tapered and flattened proximal portion for articulation with metatarsal II. Metatarsal I articulates with metatarsal II on the mid-shaft and does not contact the tarsus, in contrast to the functionally tetradactyl pes of late-branching therizinosaurians.

In medial view, metatarsal II is slightly sigmoidal, with a proximal portion that is slightly curved anteriorly and a distal portion that curves posteriorly. In proximal view, the proximal articulation surface is mediolaterally narrow, oval in shape, and the lateral surface is flattened to correspond to the medial surface of metatarsal III. Metatarsal II is slightly narrower anteroposteriorly in the mid-shaft, especially the anterior surface, which slopes more than the posterior side, but it is still oval in shape (anteroposterior length is longer than the width) in general and expanded distally. The distal end of Metatarsal II of B. inexpectus is fan-shape in medial view and expanded distally, with a smooth medial surface, unlike Falcarius, which has a subcircular distal end and collateral ligament pits [19].

Metatarsal III and metatarsal IV are longer than metatarsal II. Metatarsal III is the slenderest and the longest of the metatarsals, and it is transversely compressed. According to Xu et al. ([8], Fig 2e), metatarsal IV and metatarsal V are preserved. However, metatarsal V and the proximal end of metatarsal IV can no longer be located.

Pedal phalanges

Pedal elements are disarticulated and partially broken, so it is difficult to identify them. Five pedal phalanges are preserved and exposed relatively well, and we tentatively identify them as phalanxes I-1, I-2, II-1, III-1, and IV-2 or 3 (Fig 9C).

A well-exposed phalanx near metatarsal I is tentatively identified as phalanx I-1. This phalanx is relatively robust, with a subcircular proximal articulation surface. The cross-section becomes narrower from the proximal to the distal mid-shaft. Both the ginglymoid articular surface and extensor ligament pits are poorly developed on the distal end, but the collateral ligament pits on the sides are deep and well-developed and positioned centrally. The distal articular surface of this phalanx is relatively symmetrical. A single pedal ungual is preserved next to the referred phalanx I-1 that we interpret as phalanx I-2. It is short and curved, and smaller than any manual ungual [8].

Near the referred phalanx I-1, there is an elongate element interpreted as phalanx II-1, which possesses a subcircular proximal articular surface. Although it is poorly developed, an extensor ligament pit can be seen on the ventral side of the distal end. The shaft is curved laterally in ventral view. Articulating with the distal end of this phalanx, there is a shorter, more robust phalanx, likely to be phalanx II-2, and beyond this the proximal portion of phalanx II-3. Beneath the second digit rests another phalanx that we tentatively identify as phalanx III-1. This distal portion of this phalanx is exposed in lateral view and the collateral ligament pits of it are shallower than phalanx I-1.

Discussion

It has been more than twenty years since B. inexpectus was first described. Since this time, multiple new early-branching and late-branching therizinosaurs have been discovered and described (e.g. Falcarius [7], Jianchangosaurus [20], Lingyuanosaurus [21], Nothronychus [26]). In addition, new materials of B. inexpectus and B. sp. have been published, including the recovery and description of additional materials of the holotype representing the pelvic girdle elements, sacrals, and a series of nearly complete caudals [11]. A new feather type was additionally described from around the tail of the holotype of B. inexpectus and the neck of a new specimen, B. sp. [12]. Based on these new discoveries, Zanno [19] revised the autapomorphies of B. inexpectus. This diagnosis was further revised after the cranial osteology was published by Liao and Xu [13] and several cranial diagnostic features were added. Although new taxa of therizinosauroids have since been described, the autapomorphies proposed by Zanno [19] and Liao and Xu [13] appear to remain valid.

New acquired diagnostic features

In this study, we propos three new autapomorphies for B. inexpectus.

Ungual II shorter than III

When measuring ungual length as a straight line from the tip of the ungual to the ventralmost portion of the articular facet, the ungual of digit three is the longest one in B. inexpectus. This feature differs from other therizinosaurians, including Jianchangosaurus, as well as later-branching Alxasaurus and Erliansaurus [2, 6, 20, 32], in which the ungual of digit two is the longest.

The pre- and postacetabular length are subequal

In B. inexpectus, the pre- and postacetabular of ilium are subequal in anteroposterior length. This feature is similar in oviraptorids and early-branching ornithomimids [8, 19, 40, 41], but differs from other therizinosaurians, which possess relatively longer preacetabular portions of the ilium, including the earliest-branching member Falcarius and later-branching Nothronychus and Segnosaurus [19, 31].

Equidimensional pubic peduncle of ilium

In B. inexpectus, the anteroposterior length and width of the public peduncle is approximately the same. This is a transitional feature linking early-branching to late-branching members, and although it is found in other coelurosaurs, it is currently unique among therizinosaurs. In earlier-branching therizinosaurians, such as in Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus ([19, 20], Fig 9), the anteroposterior length is greater than its width, whereas in later-branching members (e.g. Suzhousaurus [30], Nanshiungosaurus [22], and Segnosaurus [54]), the width is significantly greater than its length.

New proposed synapomorphies for therizinosaurians

Here we discuss three possible synapomorphies found in this study—two for Therizinosauroidea and another for Therizinosauridae.

Straight ulna

In B. inexpectus, the ulna is straight as in most other therizinosaurian taxa (including Jianchangosaurus, Alxasaurus, Nothronychus, Erliansaurus, and Therizinosaurus [6, 20, 26, 32], but the ulna of the earliest-branching member Falcarius is bowed [2]. Therefore, a straight ulna appears to be a synapomorphy of Therizinosauroidea, and a reversal among coelurosaurs.

Among other coelurosaurian dinosaurs, a straight ulna is present in medium-bodied (e.g., Sinornithomimus [55]) and large-bodied taxa (e.g., some ornithomimids and Gallimimus [56], Tyrannosaurus [44], and Gorgosaurus [57]). In many smaller sized maniraptoran dinosaurs (e.g., Microraptor [47], Heyuannia [58], and Confuciusornis [59]), the ulna is bowed as in Falcarius.

Blunt termini of furcula

In B. inexpectus, Falcarius [19], and Jianchangosaurus [20], the furcular termini taper to a point. This is different from the robust and blunt termini in Neimongosaurus [23]. The blunt and robust condition may be a synapomorphy of Therizinosauridae. It is likely that the evolution of blunt termini has functional implications; however, further research is needed to understand the impact of this trait. Moreover, it is difficult to determine whether this feature is a synapomorphy for Therizinosauridae or just an autapomorphy for Neimongosaurus because currently the preservation of this element is rare among the clade.

Broad intraclavicular angle

As mentioned by Zanno [3], Falcarius possesses an acute angle (approximate 104 degrees) compared to B. inexpectus and Neimongosaurus (approximately 150 degrees). Therefore, a wider intraclavicular angle may be a synapomorphy for Therizinosauroidea.

Conclusions

Since first reported in 1999 and 2003, the holotype of B. inexpectus has only been briefly described. In our restudy of this specimen, we not only provide a detailed description and illustrations of the known elements, but describe materials of the holotype that are not mentioned in previous papers (e.g., antero-middle dorsal vertebrae and middle dorsal vertebrae). Our morphological observations support previous proposals for the phylogenetic position of B. inexpectus as the earliest-branching member of Therizinosauroidea.

We also expand the diagnosis of this taxon by adding three additional autapomorphies of the postcranial skeleton (ungual II shorter than III, subequal length of the pre- and postacetabular, and equidimensional pubic peduncle of ilium). Furthermore, we describe new synapomorphies for more inclusive therizinosaur taxa.

Detailed information on the osteology of the postcranial skeleton of B. inexpectus is important for understanding the evolution of therizinosaurs since the majority of therizinosaur taxa are known exclusively from postcranial materials. The updated diagnosis and possible synapomorphies proposed in this study shed new light on the phylogeny and alpha taxonomy of Therizinosauria.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ding Xiaoqing for preparing the specimen and Qin Zichuan (University of Bristol) for valuable comments on the early versions of the manuscript. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103) and the scholarship provided by the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) to C-C L. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Clark JM, Perle A, and Norell MA. The skull of Erlicosaurus andrewsi, a Late Cretaceous "segnosaur" (Theropoda: Therizinosauridae) from Mongolia. American Museum Novitates. 1994; 3115:1–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zanno LE. The pectoral girdle and forelimb of the primitive therizinosauroid Falcarius Utahensis (Theropoda, Maniraptora): analyzing evolutionary trends within Therizinosauroidea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2006; 26: 636–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zanno LE. A taxonomic and phylogenetic re-evaluation of Therizinosauria (Dinosauria: Maniraptora). Journal of Systematic Paleontology. 2010; 8: 503–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barsbold R. New data on Therizinosaurus (Therizinosauridae, Theropoda). Transactions, Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition. 1976; 3: 76–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perle A. Segnosauridae—A new family of theropods from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Transactions, Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expeditions, 1979; 8: 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Russell DA, Dong ZM. The affinities of a new theropod from the Alxa Desert, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China. Can J Earth Sci. 1993; 30: 2107–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kirkland JI, Zanno LE, Sampson SD, Clark JM, and Deblieux DD. A primitive therizinosauroid dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Utah. Nature. 2005; 435: 84–7. doi: 10.1038/nature03468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu X, Tang ZL, and Wang XL. A therizinosauroid dinosaur with integumentary structures from China. Nature. 1999; 399: 350–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu X, Zhao XJ, and Clark JM. A New Therizinosaur from the Lower Jurassic Lower Lufeng Formation of Yunnan, China’, Journal of Systematic Paleontology. 2001; 21: 477–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barrett PM. The affinities of the enigmatic dinosaur Eshanosaurus deguchiianus from the Early Jurassic of Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China. Palaeontology. 2010; 52: 681–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu X, Cheng YN, Wang XL, and Chang CH. Pygostyle-like Structure from Beipiaosaurus (Theropoda, Therizinosauroidea) from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2003; 77: 294–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu X, Zheng XT, and You HL. A new feather type in a nonavian theropod and the early evolution of feathers. PNAS. 2009; 106: 832–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810055106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liao C-C, and Xu X. Cranial osteology of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus (Theropoda: Therizinosauria). Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2019; 201957: 117–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu X, Clark JM, Mo J-Y, Choiniere J, Forster CA, Erickson GM, et al. A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digit homologies. Nature. 2009; 459: 940–44. doi: 10.1038/nature08124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feduccia A. The origin and evolution of birds, 2nd ed. Yale University Press: New Haven; 1999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4740 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Swisher CC, Wang XL, Zhou ZH, Wang YQ, Jin F, Zhang GY, et al. Further support for a Cretaceous age for the feathered-dinosaur beds of Liaoning, China: New 40 Ar/39 Ar dating of the Yixian and Tuchengzi Formations. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2002; 47: 135–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Irmis RB. Axial skeleton ontogeny in the Parasauchia (Archosauria: Pseudosauchia) and its implications for ontogenetic determination in Archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2007; 27(2): 350–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu X, and Norell MA. A new troodontid dinosaur from China with avian-like sleeping posture. Nature. 2004; 431: 838–41. doi: 10.1038/nature02898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zanno LE. Osteology of Falcarius utahensis (Dinosauria: Theropoda): characterizing the anatomy of basal therizinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2010; 158: 196–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pu HY, Kobayashi Y, Lü JC, Xu L, Wu YH, Chang HL, et al. An unusual basal Therizinosaur dinosaur with an ornithischian dental arrangement from northeastern China. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e63423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yao X, Liao C-C, Corwin S, and Xu X. A new transitional therizinosaurian theropod from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China. Scientific Report. 2019; 9: 5026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41560-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dong, Z. M. In Mesozoic and Cenozoic red beds of south China: selected papers from the Cretaceous-Tertiary Workshop, Nanxiong, Guangdong Province. (eds Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology & Nanjing Institute of Paleontology Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology) 342–350 (Science Press, 1997).
  • 23.Zhang XH, Xu X, Zhao XJ, Sereno P, Kuang XW, and Tan L. A long-necked therizinosauroid dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous iren Dabasu Formation of Nei Mongol, People’s Republic of China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2001; 39: 282–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Clark JM, Norell MA, and Barsbold R. Two new oviraptorids (Theropoda: Oviraptorosauria), Upper Cretaceous Djadokhta Formation, Ukhaa Tolgod, Mongolia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2001; 21: 209–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou ZH, Wang XL, Zhang FC, and Xu X. Important features of Caudipteryx- evidence from two nearly complete new specimens. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2000; 38: 241–254 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kirkland JI, and Wolfe DG. First definitive therizinosaurid (Dinosauria; Theropoda) from North America. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2001; 21: 410–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hedrick BP, Zanno LE, Wolfe DG, and Dodson P. The Slothful Claw: Osteology and Taphonomy of Nothronychus mckinleyi and N. graffami (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and Anatomical Considerations for Derived Therizinosaurids. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0129449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilson JA. A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 1999; 19(4):639–653. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Senter P, Kirkland JI, and Deblieux DD. Martharaptor greenriverensis, a New Theropod Dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Utah. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e43911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li DQ, Peng C, You HL, Lamanna MC, Harris JD, Lacovara KJ, et al. A Large Therizinosauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of Northwestern China. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2007; 81: 539–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zanno LE, Gillette DD, Albright LB, and Titus AL. A new North American therizinosaurid and the role of herbivory in ’predatory’ dinosaur evolution. Proc Biol Sci, 2009; 276: 3505–11. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu X, Zhang XH, Sereno P, Zhao XJ, Kuang XW, Han J, et al. A new Therizinosauroid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous iren Dabasu Formation of Nei Mongol. Vertebrata Palasiatica. 2002; 40: 228–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barsbold R, Osmolska H, Watabe M, Currie PJ, and Tsogtbaatar K. A new oviraptorosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from Mongolia: the first dinosaur with a pygostyle. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2000; 45: 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marshall AJ. Biology and comparative physiology of birds. Volume I. Quarterly Review of Biology. 1960; 2: iv. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Perle A, Chiappe LM, Barsbold R, Clark JM, and Norell MA. Skeletal Morphology of Mononykus olecranus (Theropoda: Avialae) from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates. 1994; 3105: 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ostrom JH. Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an unusual theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Press. 1969; 30: 1–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu X, Han FL, and Zhao Q. Homologies and homeotic transformation of the theropod ‘semilunate’ carpal. Scientific Report. 2014; 4, 6042. 10.1038/srep06042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ji Q, and Ji SA. Protarchaeopterygid bird (Protarchaeopteryx gen. nov.)- fossil remains of archaeopterygids from China. Chinese Geology 1997; 238: 38–41 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gregory PS. The Segnosaurian Dinosaurs: Relics of the Prosauropod-Ornithischian Transition? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 1984; 4: 507–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Osmólska H, Currie PJ, and Barsbold R. Oviraptorosauria. In: Weishampel DB, Dodson P, and Osmólska H (eds.), The Dinosauria (second edition). University of California Press, Berkeley. 2004; 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ji Q, Norell MA, Makovicky PJ, Gao K-Q, Ji S, and Yuan C. An Early Ostrich Dinosaur and Implications for Ornithomimosaur Phylogeny. American Museum Novitates. 2003; 3420: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Barsbold R. Opisthopubic pelvis in the carnivorous dinosaurs. Nature. 1979; 279: 792–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Norell MA, and Makovicky PJ. Important features of the dromaeosaur skeleton: information from a new specimen. American Museum Novitates.1997; 3215: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brochu CA. Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: Insights from a Nearly Complete Skeleton and High-Resolution Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Skull. Memoir Society of Vertevrate Paleontology. 2003; 22(sup4): 1–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xu X, Wang XL, and Wu XC. A dromaeosaurid dinosaur with a filamentous integument from the Yixian Formation of China. Nature. 1999; 401: 262–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu X, Zhou ZH, and Wang XL. The smallest known non-avian theropod dinosaur. Nature. 2000; 408: 705. doi: 10.1038/35047056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xu X, Zhou ZH, Wang XL, Kuang XW, Zhang FC, and Du XK. Four-winged dinosaurs from China. Nature. 2003; 421: 335–40. doi: 10.1038/nature01342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Makovicky PJ, Apesteguia S, and Agnolin FL. The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature. 2005; 437: 1007–11. doi: 10.1038/nature03996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu X, Norell MA, Wang XL, Makovicky PJ, and Wu XC. A basal troodontid from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nature. 2002; 415: 780–4. doi: 10.1038/415780a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Forster CA, Sampson SD, Chiappe LM, and Krause DW. The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the late cretaceous of Madagascar. Science. 1998; 279: 1915–19. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5358.1915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Perle A, Chiappe LM, Barsbold R, Clark JM, Norell MA. Skeletal morphology of Mononychus olecranus (Theropoda: Availae) from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates. 1994; 3105: 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Norell MA, and Makovicky PJ. Dromaeosauridae. In: Weishampel DB, Dodson P, and Osmólska H (eds.), The Dinosauria (second edition). University of California Press, Berkeley. 2004; 196–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chiappe LM, Norrell MA, and Clark JM. Phylogenetic Position of Mononykus (Aves: Alvarezsauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 1996; 39: 557–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Barsbold R, and Altangarel P. Segnosauria, a new infraorder of carnivorous dinosaurs. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 1980; 25(2): 187–195 [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kobayashi Y, and Lü JC. A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2003; 48: 235- [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kobayashi Y, and Barsbold R. Ornithomimids from the Nemegt Formation of Mongolia. Journal of Paleontological Society of Korea. 2006; 22: 195–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lambe LM. The Cretaceous Theropodous Dinosaur Gorgosaurus. Canada Department of Mines and Geological Survey Memoir. 1917; 100: 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lü JC, Pu HY, Kobayashi Y, Xu L, Chang HL, Shang YH, et al. A New Oviraptorid Dinosaur (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Southern China and Its Paleobiogeographical Implications. Scientific Report. 2015; 5: 1–15. doi: 10.1038/srep11490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hou LH, Zhou ZH, Gu YC, and Zhang H. Confuciusornis sanctus, a new Late Jurassic sauriurine bird from China. Chinese Science Bulletin. 1995; 40: 1545. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ulrich Joger

14 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-14221

Postcranial osteology of  Beipiaosaurus inexpectus (Theropoda: Therizinosauria)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please take care of the suggestions of both reviewers (mainly improvements of writing).

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ulrich Joger

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your manuscript, please provide additional information regarding the specimens used in your study. Ensure that you have reported specimen numbers and complete repository information, including museum name and geographic location. 

If permits were required, please ensure that you have provided details for all permits that were obtained, including the full name of the issuing authority, and add the following statement:

'All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.'

If no permits were required, please include the following statement:

'No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.'

For more information on PLOS ONE's requirements for paleontology and archaeology research, see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-paleontology-and-archaeology-research

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. We note that Figure(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9  to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission. 

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear authors,

indeed this is a very important manuscript due to the circumstance, that the description of the postcranial material of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus still was never published in the global community. The descriptive part of the manuscript is very informative and fits perfectly to the pictures. The coloration of the bones within the photographs sometimes helps, but sometimes leads to a very unnatural appearance of the image. Altogether a very interesting paper!

Reviewer #2: This is a solid paper, and a welcome addition to previously published information on Beipiaosaurus inexpectus. The osteological descriptions are generally good and the images are very helpful (recoloring the bones to highlight their morphology was a good idea).

The authors also provide a lot of contextual/comparative information and highlight areas of uncertainty (i.e. identity of carpals), so I do not have any major complaints or comments regarding the scientific merits of the paper.

The text needs a serious polish in terms of wording, grammar etc. but that should only take a couple of hours, so "minor revisions". I have highlighted some examples below:

I would reword some sentences in the abstract, for example:

Beipiaosaurus inexpectus, from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Sihetun Locality near Beipiao

"Locality" should be lower case, and "from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation (Sihetun locality, near Beipiao)" sounds better.

Page 3, lines 56, 61: "disentangle" would be a better word here.

Page 3, line 63: Is pygostyle supposed to be in quotation marks here?

Page 3, line 64: this should probably read "a unique type of feathers"

Page 3, line 65: Repetition of "of the"

In Table 1 (vertebral measurements), please use "vertebrae" (i.e., cervical vertebrae) because you are including measurements for several vertebrae.

Page 9, line 165 - this needs fixing: "there is a web of bone connected the two parts called intrapostzygapophyseal lamina

Page 11, line 212 - this needs fixing: "The well-developed lamina and fossa system is also a feature can be seen"

Page 11, line 223 - missing space: "heightas"

Page 12, line 237-239: missing parenthesis

Page 12, line 249: This should read "The last three sacrals"

Page 12, line 254: This should read subrectangular

Page 14, line 296 and throughout that paragraph: This should be the plural form (postzygapophyses)

Page 14, line 301: "most crushed"? Needs fixing.

Page 15, line 314: caudal series (not caudals series)

Table 2 - please check and fix the wording (e.g., "some midshaft might lost")

Page 17, line 335: remove "in"

Page 17, lines 338-340: reword this last sentence.

Page 17, line 341: repetition of "~"

Page 17, line 346: missing space

Page 18, line 362: this should read "similar to those"

Page 18, line 370: Should read "the glenoid"

Page 19, not sure about the use of "enhanced" here: "This feature may be enhanced by or entirely the result of crushing"

Page 21, line 436-438: Should read "the humeral head"

Page 21, line 442: Separate the words

Page 21, line 453: Should read "the humerus"

Page 22, line 476: This should read "There is a prominent..."

Page 22, line 483: This should be the plural form of radius...

Page 23, line 507: This first sentence is not really complete.

Page 25, please rewrite: "In general, metacarpal elements of B. inexpectus is resemble to those of Falcarius [2]."

Page 30, please reword: "The ilium is parallelogram in shape"

Page 33, line 740: Prominent

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-14221_reviewer.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257913.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Jul 2021

Dear Dr. Joger and anonymous reviewers,

We are thankful for your consideration of our manuscript and for the generous comments by the reviewers. We have updated the manuscript in light of the comments received, and believe that our revised submission is now suitable for publication.

Below, we enumerate the changes we have made to the manuscript in response to the requested revisions:

1) In journal requirements, the permits are asked to state in manuscript.

The specimen has been published before and housed in IVPP, so no field or related permits are needed in this study. We have added the statement in Methods (Lines 79-80).

2) Journal requirements indicates “We note that Figure(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in your submission contain copyrighted images…”.

All the figures were drawn or token by authors of this article, so all of them are not under copyright. We have made a more detailed statement in “Copyrighted Figures” of “Additional Information”.

3) Reviewer 1 suggests explaining the reason of terminology choosing of manual digits (Lines 73-75).

The choosing of the terminology is to in light of the recent research of avian digit homology. We have added the reason in lines 75-76.

4) Reviewer 1 suggests using only genetic name or genetic and species name in lines 130-135.

We fixed it into genetic name only throughout the paragraph, and note the species name and number when referring to specific specimen.

5) Reviewer 1 suggests a more detailed description in line 328 instead of just saying “different”.

We have added a brief description of the chevrons of Falcarius and Alxasaurus to show how do they different from the chevrons of Beipiaosaurus (Lines 328-329).

6) Both reviewers found the sentence in lines 342-345 needs rewording.

We have miswritten the sentence and reworded it to make the contents more reasonable now (Lines 342-343).

And we have followed all the writing improvement suggestions made by both reviewers.

Many thanks for your consideration, and best wishes,

Chun-Chi Liao

On behalf of all authors.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ulrich Joger

14 Sep 2021

Postcranial osteology of  Beipiaosaurus inexpectus (Theropoda: Therizinosauria)

PONE-D-21-14221R1

Dear Dr. Liao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ulrich Joger

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Ulrich Joger

20 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-14221R1

Postcranial osteology of Beipiaosaurus inexpectus (Theropoda: Therizinosauria)

Dear Dr. Xu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ulrich Joger

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-14221_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES