{"id":97813,"date":"2026-07-30T10:30:24","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T17:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/github.blog\/?p=97813"},"modified":"2026-07-30T10:30:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T17:30:27","slug":"stacked-sessions-and-pull-requests-in-the-github-copilot-app","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/github.blog\/ai-and-ml\/github-copilot\/stacked-sessions-and-pull-requests-in-the-github-copilot-app\/","title":{"rendered":"Stacked sessions and pull requests in the GitHub Copilot app"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

I want you to look at this screenshot for a moment from the GitHub Copilot app<\/a>. It’s a small one, it’s got a lot of icons, and it tells the most glorious story that I’m really excited about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Screenshot<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This image is a set of stacked sessions. They’re a series of tasks in the same repository, where each session builds off each other!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More on those below, but first, why is this screenshot so magical? We need to go back more than a decade to start. I have this very old repo of mine for a personal app. I first made it ages<\/em> ago (end of 2014-ish), and it’s done what I want it to do (it’s like a personal “life” dashboard of calendars and smart devices in my home and task management) for all those years. I occasionally do some updates, but those have gotten harder and harder to wrangle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My dependencies had gotten old<\/em>. Embarrassingly old. I was using React 15 (which was released in 2016), Less for CSS pre-processing, and a version of react-bootstrap from around that time. Yes, you read that right. Bootstrap<\/em>. This was old.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trying to untangle this absolute mess before AI would have taken me weeks. I had tried and given up before. It’s not the largest app in the world, but it’s juuuust<\/em> big enough that it would be painful, and the juice was simply not worth the squeeze.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…but we do<\/em> have AI now, and so I fired up the GitHub Copilot app, added the repo, and got started.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First step: Could I one-shot this?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

No.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I tried though! This is the prompt that I used in Plan mode:<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
I want to modernize the frontend for this project. I first wrote a lot of this code more than 10 years ago and it should be cleaned up a lot. I'm thinking we start either using Tailwind or just vanilla CSS (please vet everything to help me decide), we remove all Less (etc), and clean everything up accessibility-wise and responsiveness-wise. Right now I really want to just focus on styles, and then slowly but surely organize and consolidate the React functionality. It might be worth modernizing dependencies, too. Let's come up with a plan around this before diving in. \n \n1. Nothing is sacred, it's okay if we have to completely start over some parts \n2. Links should change colors and add underlines on hover\/focus \n3. Input boxes should have a smaller border radius in general, and their labels should be cleaner \n4. There should be good wrapping and a max-width on containers so that an input box doesn't span an entire wide monitor.<\/code><\/pre>\n<\/path><\/path><\/svg><\/path><\/svg><\/clipboard-copy><\/div>\n\n\n
I passed this into Claude Opus 4.8 got a Rubber Duck review from GPT-5.5, and had to do quite a bit of back-and-forth to make decisions. Once I got to a place I was happy with, I hit “go” and let the app go to town on my project to see if it would work!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
…it didn’t, and it was my fault.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Second step: Realizing I had tried this before<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
So, remember when I said I’d “tried and given up before?” Turns out, I actually had an old dev<\/code>branch where I actually had modernized some parts, and didn’t realize the compatibility issues I’d run into.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But, that was a good thing!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When I ran the new version from this session, I realized that I was branching off main<\/code>, but that my current deployment that I was using regularly was using my partially updated version on dev<\/code>. So, some wanted features that I had made for myself needed to be included in this set of changes. But, the changes were just<\/em> big enough that I actually had to apply those changes to the dev<\/code>branch to save my sanity a bit, rather than pull in the dev<\/code>changes to main<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pre-AI… my word, this would have made me pull my hair out in frustration. I was admittedly frustrated here, too. I had spent time and tokens trying to get this running with what I thought was a decent plan. But! I was able to switch gears (and sessions) with a simple ask, which was way cooler than I expected it to be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\"Screenshot<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
All was not wasted! Copilot made a new session for me, closed the pull request I had attempted, and ported my styling decisions to changes it was applying to the dev branch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Third step: Findings after testing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Whew, okay, so I had a good branch going, and a pull request I was decently happy with. As I started testing, though, I couldn’t help but notice some old warnings in my console.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
My heart filled with dread as I saw old references to findDOMNode<\/code>and componentWillReceiveProps<\/code>, functions I personally hadn’t touched in years and years. Ugh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Those references were not in my codebase as much anymore, but they were in react-bootstrap. I opened up Plan mode again, because I needed to figure out if an upgrade would work, or if I should remove the library entirely:<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
Do you think we should remove react-bootstrap entirely (and replace with a modern alternative), or just upgrade\/migrate existing components?<\/code><\/pre>\n<\/path><\/path><\/svg><\/path><\/svg><\/clipboard-copy><\/div>\n\n\n
Running this gave me a decent plan, talked through the options, and recommended replacing the library entirely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fourth step: Stacking a session on top of the other<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
I needed to make sure my changes were safe from the existing work, but the react-bootstrap replacement felt like a lot<\/em> of scope creep for what I was currently doing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I’ve found that in a lot of my “agentic” engineering work, it’s particularly hard to avoid that kind of scope creep. Because I don’t have to write all the code myself, it’s so tempting to make 10,000 line pull requests that take care of all of the things I want to do! Which is really just a new form of procrastination, ha.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So, instead of making this mega pull request for myself to test, I broke it up with a new session, and prompted:<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
Let's make a pull request for the existing work, and then start a new session for this react-bootstrap replacement work that will branch off this existing work here, and be a separate pull request to merge into dev after this one. <\/code><\/pre>\n<\/path><\/path><\/svg><\/path><\/svg><\/clipboard-copy><\/div>\n\n\n
This is the part that felt magical enough to make me want to write this blog post. The GitHub Copilot app:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Made a pull request for all of my current changes off dev<\/code><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Made a “stacked session” for react-bootstrap removal (it took the previous context, made a session to run after the existing session, created a plan, had me approve the plan, and ran)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Made a stacked pull request<\/a> following my existing work<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
    THIS WAS SO COOL. Stacked sessions and<\/em> stacked pull requests? Is this the future?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    YES.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    In case you don’t get what that means by name: A stack is a series of pull requests in the same repository where each pull request targets the branch of the pull request below it, forming an ordered chain that ultimately lands on your main branch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    In my case, not only did the sessions follow each other, but their changes did too!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    Fifth step: Sailing off into the sunset with stacked pull requests<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
    I know I’m being somewhat cheeky with my excitement, but my happiness is sincere. The ease of shipping these changes was a delightful experience after neglecting my old codebase for ages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    Let’s look at that first screenshot again: I’ll walk you through it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    \"Screenshot<\/figure>\n\n\n\n