Lemma concerning the limit of subadditive sequences
In mathematics, and in particular in calculus , Fekete's lemma (also called Fekete's subadditive lemma ) is a lemma concerning the limit of subadditive sequences . The lemma provides an estimate for the linear growth rate of such sequences.
The lemma is named after the Hungarian-Israeli mathematician Michael Fekete , who proved it in 1923.[ 1]
Statement of the theorem [ edit ]
In this article,
N
{\displaystyle \mathbb {N} }
denotes the natural numbers . This set does not include the number 0.
A sequence of real numbers
{
a
n
}
n
=
1
∞
{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }}
is called a subadditive sequence if and only if for all
m
,
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {N} }
one has
a
n
+
m
≤
a
n
+
a
m
.
{\displaystyle a_{n+m}\leq a_{n}+a_{m}.}
Fekete's lemma states that for every subadditive sequence,
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}.}
That is, the sequence
a
n
n
{\displaystyle {\frac {a_{n}}{n}}}
converges to its infimum . Note that this infimum may be
−
∞
{\displaystyle -\infty }
.
To prove that the limit exists and equals the infimum, it suffices to show that
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
≤
lim inf
n
→
∞
a
n
n
≤
lim sup
n
→
∞
a
n
n
≤
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
,
{\displaystyle \inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq \liminf _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq \limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq \inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}},}
where
lim inf
{\displaystyle \liminf }
and
lim sup
{\displaystyle \limsup }
denote the limit inferior and limit superior , respectively. The two left inequalities always hold, so it is enough to prove the rightmost inequality
lim sup
n
→
∞
a
n
n
≤
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
.
{\displaystyle \limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq \inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}.}
Since the sequence is subadditive, one can prove by induction that for all
m
,
n
,
l
,
k
∈
N
{\displaystyle m,n,l,k\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
l
+
m
k
≤
n
a
l
+
m
a
k
.
{\displaystyle a_{nl+mk}\leq na_{l}+ma_{k}.}
Define
a
0
=
0
{\displaystyle a_{0}=0}
. Then this inequality also holds when one of the indices
m
,
n
,
l
,
k
{\displaystyle m,n,l,k}
is 0.
Now fix some
q
∈
N
{\displaystyle q\in \mathbb {N} }
. For every
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {N} }
there exist
m
∈
N
{\displaystyle m\in \mathbb {N} }
and
0
≤
r
≤
q
−
1
{\displaystyle 0\leq r\leq q-1}
such that
n
=
m
q
+
r
{\displaystyle n=mq+r}
. Hence, by the inequality above,
a
n
≤
m
a
q
+
a
r
.
{\displaystyle a_{n}\leq ma_{q}+a_{r}.}
Define
C
q
=
max
(
a
0
,
a
1
,
…
,
a
q
−
1
)
{\displaystyle C_{q}=\max(a_{0},a_{1},\dots ,a_{q-1})}
. Dividing the inequality above by
n
{\displaystyle n}
yields
a
n
n
≤
m
a
q
+
a
r
n
=
m
a
q
n
+
a
r
n
≤
m
a
q
m
q
+
C
q
n
=
a
q
q
+
C
q
n
.
{\displaystyle {\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq {\frac {ma_{q}+a_{r}}{n}}={\frac {ma_{q}}{n}}+{\frac {a_{r}}{n}}\leq {\frac {ma_{q}}{mq}}+{\frac {C_{q}}{n}}={\frac {a_{q}}{q}}+{\frac {C_{q}}{n}}.}
Taking the limit superior as
n
→
∞
{\displaystyle n\to \infty }
, we obtain
lim sup
n
→
∞
a
n
n
≤
a
q
q
.
{\displaystyle \limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq {\frac {a_{q}}{q}}.}
Since
q
{\displaystyle q}
was arbitrary, this holds for all
q
{\displaystyle q}
, and therefore
lim sup
n
→
∞
a
n
n
≤
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
.
{\displaystyle \limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\leq \inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}.}
Combining the inequalities, we conclude that
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}.}
∎
Define a sequence
{
a
n
}
n
=
1
∞
{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }}
by, for all
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
:=
n
+
n
.
{\displaystyle a_{n}:=n+{\sqrt {n}}.}
One can show that this sequence is subadditive, since for all
n
,
m
∈
N
{\displaystyle n,m\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
+
m
=
n
+
m
+
n
+
m
≤
n
+
m
+
n
+
m
=
a
n
+
a
m
.
{\displaystyle a_{n+m}=n+m+{\sqrt {n+m}}\leq n+m+{\sqrt {n}}+{\sqrt {m}}=a_{n}+a_{m}.}
Indeed,
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
n
+
n
n
=
1.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {n+{\sqrt {n}}}{n}}=1.}
Let
0
<
c
∈
R
{\displaystyle 0<c\in \mathbb {R} }
. Define a sequence
{
a
n
}
n
=
1
∞
{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }}
by, for all
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
:=
⌈
c
n
⌉
,
{\displaystyle a_{n}:=\lceil cn\rceil ,}
where
⌈
⋅
⌉
{\displaystyle \lceil \cdot \rceil }
denotes the ceiling function . The sequence is subadditive, since for all
n
,
m
∈
N
{\displaystyle n,m\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
+
m
=
⌈
c
(
n
+
m
)
⌉
=
⌈
c
n
+
c
m
⌉
≤
⌈
c
n
⌉
+
⌈
c
m
⌉
=
a
n
+
a
m
.
{\displaystyle a_{n+m}=\lceil c(n+m)\rceil =\lceil cn+cm\rceil \leq \lceil cn\rceil +\lceil cm\rceil =a_{n}+a_{m}.}
Indeed,
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
⌈
c
n
⌉
n
=
c
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {\lceil cn\rceil }{n}}=c.}
Superadditive sequences [ edit ]
A sequence of real numbers
{
a
n
}
n
=
1
∞
{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }}
is called superadditive if and only if for all
m
,
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
+
m
≥
a
n
+
a
m
.
{\displaystyle a_{n+m}\geq a_{n}+a_{m}.}
Using Fekete's lemma, one can show that for every superadditive sequence,[ 2]
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
sup
n
∈
N
a
n
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\sup _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}.}
That is, the sequence
a
n
n
{\displaystyle {\frac {a_{n}}{n}}}
converges to its supremum . As in the subadditive case, this supremum may be
∞
{\displaystyle \infty }
.
The proof follows by applying Fekete's lemma to the sequence
b
n
:=
−
a
n
{\displaystyle b_{n}:=-a_{n}}
.
Submultiplicative sequences [ edit ]
A sequence of real numbers
{
a
n
}
n
=
1
∞
{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }}
is called submultiplicative if and only if for all
m
,
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
+
m
≤
a
n
a
m
.
{\displaystyle a_{n+m}\leq a_{n}a_{m}.}
Using Fekete's lemma, one can show that for every submultiplicative sequence with positive terms,
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\sqrt[{n}]{a_{n}}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\sqrt[{n}]{a_{n}}}.}
The proof follows by applying Fekete's lemma to the sequence
b
n
:=
ln
a
n
{\displaystyle b_{n}:=\ln a_{n}}
, where
ln
{\displaystyle \ln }
denotes the natural logarithm .
Note that since Fekete's lemma for submultiplicative sequences applies only to positive sequences, the infimum is necessarily finite and nonnegative. This fact has important applications, for example:
Almost subadditive sequence [ edit ]
Let
{
a
n
}
n
=
1
∞
{\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }}
be a sequence of real numbers for which there exists
C
∈
R
{\displaystyle C\in \mathbb {R} }
such that for all
m
,
n
∈
N
{\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {N} }
,
a
n
+
m
≤
a
n
+
a
m
+
C
.
{\displaystyle a_{n+m}\leq a_{n}+a_{m}+C.}
Such a sequence is called almost subadditive . Then,
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
+
C
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}+C}{n}}.}
Define a new sequence
b
n
:=
a
n
+
C
{\displaystyle b_{n}:=a_{n}+C}
. It is subadditive, since
b
n
+
m
=
a
n
+
m
+
C
≤
a
n
+
a
m
+
C
+
C
=
b
n
+
b
m
.
{\displaystyle b_{n+m}=a_{n+m}+C\leq a_{n}+a_{m}+C+C=b_{n}+b_{m}.}
Therefore,
lim
n
→
∞
b
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
b
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
+
C
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {b_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {b_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}+C}{n}}.}
On the other hand,
|
b
n
n
−
a
n
n
|
=
C
n
→
0
,
{\displaystyle \left|{\frac {b_{n}}{n}}-{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}\right|={\frac {C}{n}}\to 0,}
so the two sequences have the same limit. Hence,
lim
n
→
∞
a
n
n
=
inf
n
∈
N
a
n
+
C
n
.
{\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n}}=\inf _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {a_{n}+C}{n}}.}
∎