close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Mar 29:5:34.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-34.

Iterative Group Analysis (iGA): a simple tool to enhance sensitivity and facilitate interpretation of microarray experiments

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Iterative Group Analysis (iGA): a simple tool to enhance sensitivity and facilitate interpretation of microarray experiments

Rainer Breitling et al. BMC Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Background: The biological interpretation of even a simple microarray experiment can be a challenging and highly complex task. Here we present a new method (Iterative Group Analysis) to facilitate, improve, and accelerate this process.

Results: Our Iterative Group Analysis approach (iGA) uses elementary statistics to identify those functional classes of genes that are significantly changed in an experiment and at the same time determines which of the class members are most likely to be differentially expressed. iGA does not require that all members of a class change and is therefore robust against imperfect class assignments, which can be derived from public sources (e.g. GeneOntologies) or automated processes (e.g. key word extraction from gene names). In contrast to previous non-iterative approaches, iGA does not depend on the availability of fixed lists of differentially expressed genes, and thus can be used to increase the sensitivity of gene detection especially in very noisy or small data sets. In the extreme, iGA can even produce statistically meaningful results without any experimental replication. The automated functional annotation provided by iGA greatly reduces the complexity of microarray results and facilitates the interpretation process. In addition, iGA can be used as a fast and efficient tool for the platform-independent comparison of a microarray experiment to the vast number of published results, automatically highlighting shared genes of potential interest.

Conclusions: By applying iGA to a wide variety of data from diverse organisms and platforms we show that this approach enhances and accelerates the interpretation of microarray experiments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principle of Iterative Group Analysis. The left panels shows a notional microarray result for 14 genes (n = 14), which are sorted by decreasing fold-change. 5 of the genes (filled circles) belong to the functional class of interest (x = 5). For each class member the p-value was calculated according to the hypergeometric equation given in the text, using the t- and z-values shown next to each gene. The left panel shows those p-values plotted against the position of the class member. The minimum is found at position 3 and is used to determine the cutoff for this group, i.e. group members 1 to 3 would be listed as "most likely to be up-regulated". The corresponding p-value (0.1) would be assigned as the PC-value for this group.

References

    1. Cui X, Churchill GA. Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol. 2003;4:210. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-4-210. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan W. A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:546–554. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.546. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pan W. On the use of permutation in and the performance of a class of nonparametric methods to detect differential gene expression. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1333–1340. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pepe MS, Longton G, Anderson GL, Schummer M. Selecting differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments. Biometrics. 2003;59:133–142. - PubMed
    1. Stolovitzky G. Gene selection in microarray data: the elephant, the blind men and our algorithms. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13:370–376. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00078-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources