close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;20(5):547-53.
doi: 10.1101/gr.076000.108.

Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of modern humans

Affiliations

Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of modern humans

James P Noonan. Genome Res. 2010 May.

Abstract

Humans possess unique physical and cognitive characteristics relative to other primates. Comparative analyses of the human and chimpanzee genomes are beginning to reveal sequence changes on the human lineage that may have contributed to the evolution of human traits. However, these studies cannot identify the genetic differences that distinguish modern humans from archaic human species. Here, I will discuss efforts to obtain genomic sequence from Neanderthal, the closest known relative of modern humans. Recent studies in this nascent field have focused on developing methods to recover nuclear DNA from Neanderthal remains. The success of these early studies has inspired a Neanderthal genome project, which promises to produce a reference Neanderthal genome sequence in the near future. Technical issues, such as the level of Neanderthal sequence coverage that can realistically be obtained from a single specimen and the presence of modern human contaminating sequences, reduce the detection of authentic human-Neanderthal sequence differences but may be remedied by methodological improvements. More critical for the utility of a Neanderthal genome sequence is the evolutionary relationship of humans and Neanderthals. Current evidence suggests that the modern human and Neanderthal lineages diverged before the emergence of contemporary humans. A fraction of biologically relevant human-chimpanzee sequence differences are thus likely to have arisen and become fixed exclusively on the modern human lineage. A reconstructed Neanderthal genome sequence could be integrated into human-primate genome comparisons to help reveal the evolutionary genetic events that produced modern humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Evolutionary relationship of modern human, Neanderthal, and chimpanzee. Divergence dates shown are estimated from genome sequence comparisons. A schematic of the single nucleotide changes detected in human–Neanderthal–chimpanzee comparisons is shown at right, ordered by the frequency at which they are likely to appear. Substitution classes and the ancient DNA artifacts particularly problematic for each are described in the legend. (B) Value of Neanderthal genome sequence for dating functionally relevant human-specific substitutions, using the HACNS1 enhancer as an example. (Top) HACNS1 is located in an intron of AGAP1 and downstream of GBX2 on human chromosome 2. (Bottom) The 13 human-specific substitutions implicated in the human-specific gain of function in this element. The enhancer expression patterns conferred by HACNS1 and the chimpanzee ortholog in E11.5 mouse embryos are shown on the right. In a human–Neanderthal genome comparison, single Neanderthal sequence reads (red arrows) will be tiled across this region. A single read spanning HACNS1 may identify which substitutions are unique to modern humans and which are shared between modern humans and Neanderthals. This analysis would also provide insight into the enhancer expression pattern of the Neanderthal HACNS1 ortholog.

References

    1. Bailey SE, Weaver TD, Hublin JJ 2009. Who made the Aurignacian and other early Upper Paleolithic industries? J Hum Evol 57: 11–26 - PubMed
    1. Blow MJ, Zhang T, Woyke T, Speller CF, Krivoshapkin A, Yang DY, Derevianko A, Rubin EM 2008. Identification of ancient remains through genomic sequencing. Genome Res 18: 1347–1353 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briggs AW, Stenzel U, Johnson PL, Green RE, Kelso J, Prufer K, Meyer M, Krause J, Ronan MT, Lachmann M, et al. 2007. Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 14616–14621 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briggs AW, Good JM, Green RE, Krause J, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Lalueza-Fox C, Rudan P, Brajkovic D, Kucan Z, et al. 2009a. Targeted retrieval and analysis of five Neanderthal mtDNA genomes. Science 325: 318–321 - PubMed
    1. Briggs AW, Good JM, Green RE, Krause J, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Paabo S 2009b. Primer extension capture: Targeted sequence retrieval from heavily degraded DNA sources. J Vis Exp 1573 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources