close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 17:14:892.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-892.

RNA-Seq optimization with eQTL gold standards

Affiliations

RNA-Seq optimization with eQTL gold standards

Shannon E Ellis et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) experiments have been optimized for library preparation, mapping, and gene expression estimation. These methods, however, have revealed weaknesses in the next stages of analysis of differential expression, with results sensitive to systematic sample stratification or, in more extreme cases, to outliers. Further, a method to assess normalization and adjustment measures imposed on the data is lacking.

Results: To address these issues, we utilize previously published eQTLs as a novel gold standard at the center of a framework that integrates DNA genotypes and RNA-Seq data to optimize analysis and aid in the understanding of genetic variation and gene expression. After detecting sample contamination and sequencing outliers in RNA-Seq data, a set of previously published brain eQTLs was used to determine if sample outlier removal was appropriate. Improved replication of known eQTLs supported removal of these samples in downstream analyses. eQTL replication was further employed to assess normalization methods, covariate inclusion, and gene annotation. This method was validated in an independent RNA-Seq blood data set from the GTEx project and a tissue-appropriate set of eQTLs. eQTL replication in both data sets highlights the necessity of accounting for unknown covariates in RNA-Seq data analysis.

Conclusion: As each RNA-Seq experiment is unique with its own experiment-specific limitations, we offer an easily-implementable method that uses the replication of known eQTLs to guide each step in one's data analysis pipeline. In the two data sets presented herein, we highlight not only the necessity of careful outlier detection but also the need to account for unknown covariates in RNA-Seq experiments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data analysis pipeline for analysis of RNA-Seq data. Blue boxes are data analyses carried out on RNA. Purple indicates DNA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
eQTL replication in brain data. Normalization by EDASeq (red bars) demonstrates that sample outlier removal improves eQTL replication and that whole gene annotation provides improved gene expression estimation than coding sequence (CDS) only. CQN normalization (green bars) provides slightly improved eQTL replication over EDASeq normalization and demonstrates the necessity of covariate inclusion in eQTL replication, particularly highlighting the necessity of accounting for unknown covariates. Per-gene outlier removal (PGOR, blue bars) does not hamper our ability to detect cis-eQTLs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Simulated contamination of RNA-Seq reads. Sample contamination was simulated by mixing RNA-Seq reads from two different samples in controlled ratios. These intentionally contaminated samples’ RNA genotypes were then compared back to the DNA genotypes from which they were mixed. Specifically, a Purity Percentage of ‘10’ indicates that 10% of the reads in that RNA genotype file were sampled from the DNA sample to which it was compared.
Figure 4
Figure 4
eQTL replication in blood data. Colors correspond to the comparable analyses carried out in the brain data (Figure 2). Again, these data show that CQN (green bars) slightly improves eQTL detection over EDASeq (red bars) and that a considerable increase in eQTL detection is seen when unknown covariates are considered in the analysis.

References

    1. Bainbridge MN, Warren RL, Hirst M, Romanuik T, Zeng T, Go A, Delaney A, Griffith M, Hickenbotham M, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Sadar MD, Siddiqui AS, Marra MA, Jones SJM. Analysis of the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP transcriptome using a sequencing-by-synthesis approach. BMC Genomics. 2006;14:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-246. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison DB, Cui X, Page GP, Sabripour M. Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;14:55–65. doi: 10.1038/nrg1749. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shendure J. The beginning of the end for microarrays? Nat Methods. 2008;14:585–587. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0708-585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;14:667–672. doi: 10.1038/nrg3305. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore JH, Asselbergs FW, Williams SM. Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2010;14:445–455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp713. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types