User talk:Cornerstone1949

Welcome!

Hello, Cornerstone1949, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 04:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Cornerstone1949! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 20:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... I have read the image use policy, but am having trouble determining if an image found on the internet is copyrighted or not, and if it can be used. Is there an easy way to do this? Cornerstone1949 (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

You should have read that almost all images "found" on the internet will not be usable because they do not have associated with them a release that would allow use on Wikipedia. We presume images are protected by a restrictive copyright in the absence of some such positive release information. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem has been accepted

Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Other Times has been accepted

Other Times, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florian Gadsby (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Florian Gadsby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Camilla

Her affair was at least as much of a big deal from a notoriety perspective as Andrew and his association with Epstein. It involved Diana, possibly the most famous woman of the last 50 years (certainly one of them), and Charles of course, and it's the reason she's now the Queen. It was massive, but it's not as relevant today as it would have been say 25 years ago as far as opening her encyclopedia article. Utahredrock (talk) 02:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

I just looked at her article and her affair is the third sentence in her lead. It's also the 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph. So the same place I am now proposing Epstein go into Andrew's lead (aka the third sentence overall). Utahredrock (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

That makes sense. Her current lead lining up with the new proposal for Andrew would potentially be a good thing to point out on the talk page too. I think those of us who didn't live through it underestimate how famous Diana was. That said, Camilla is pretty notable now for being the Queen of England, and if Andrew somehow gets a similar role later in life, we can always change the lead, as unlikely as that all is to happen. All in all, I don't think such a prominent mention of Epstein is inappropriate in the slightest. Cornerstone1949 (talk) 02:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florian Gadsby has been accepted

Florian Gadsby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 04:11, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre, and Ghislaine Maxwell.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre, and Ghislaine Maxwell.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Absolutiva 04:29, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell

Hi Cornerstone,
In your edit at Special:Diff/1356916530 you introduced a reference to Qin, et. al. I've done some ctrl-f on the document trying to find its relevance to the photo and wasn't able to find anything. Can you point me to any quotes from the source which reference the photo. TarnishedPath^talk 09:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Die wissenschaftliche Fachveröffentlichung erwähnt das Foto nicht direkt. Sie behandelt ausführlich das Thema des Bildspleißens, die Fortschritte dieser Technologie sowie verschiedene Methoden zu deren Erkennung. Die von Herrn Farid verwendete Methode wird im dritten und vierten Abschnitt der Einleitung beschrieben. Dort wird erläutert, dass sie bei traditionellen Formen der Bildmanipulation wirksam ist, insbesondere bei solchen, die vor der Entwicklung von großes Sprachmodell (LLMs) üblich waren. Cornerstone1949 (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

I have also added another source to the article which should do a better job explaining image copy-move forgeries and the difficulty in seamlessness which would have fooled these methods 15 years ago. I didn't mean to reply in German the first time, sorry about that! Cornerstone1949 (talk) 20:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

I changed the wording of our sentence as well so it applies to images in general rather than this specific image, as that is what the sources are about, which conveys the same meaning while hopefully improving neutrality and preventing original research. Cornerstone1949 (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

OK, that is probably better. I'm hoping the GA reviewer doesn't take issue with it. TarnishedPath^talk 00:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

One more thing: I was having trouble with the citation numbered eight, do you know how to fix it? Cornerstone1949 (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:15, 31 May 2026 (UTC)