User talk:GnuUserr

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kazakh–Uzbek Wars (1503–1513) has been accepted

Kazakh–Uzbek Wars (1503–1513), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 12:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Invite to WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite!

Hello GnuUserr. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the participants. If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite (1)|~~~~}} Thanks, The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals (Please don't click this) 13:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazakh–Dzungar War (1723–1730), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuman was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaghatays (April 24)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, AirshipJungleman29, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.

• To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Chagatai Khanate. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
• If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Chaghatays to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, GnuUserr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Crimean Tatars, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed.

For other edits, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

About your new Wiki:Project-Kazakh-Dzungar War (1752-1755)

Hello, I am aware of your new Wiki Military History project. I would like to ask you to move your new project to draft mode so that other editors like us can follow the process and collaborate without leaving hidden text in the main article. You can easily create a workspace by starting a page like Draft:Kazakh–Dzungar War (1752–1755) or an subpage in your user space. This will help you complete your 1752-1755 sections easily and quickly. Once you are done and we reach a consensus, we can merge the completed section—including the "Kazakh victory" result—directly into the main Kazakh–Dzungar Wars article. Let me know if you need help setting this draft up! Al-Rakhat, Ibn Abu Muhammad beg (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Kazakhstan, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chagatai, Zafarnama and Natanzi were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello GnuUserr! Your additions to Kazakhs have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Dzungar Khanate

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dzungar Khanate, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazakhs, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pikes and Bows were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Қазақ хандығы

Қазақ хандығының соңғы ханы Кенесары Қасымұлы. Бұл Қазақстанның ресми истографиясына сүйенетін ақпарат. Кенесарыны үш жүздің өкілдері хан сайлаған. Қайта қайта өзгерткенді доғар!!!! Sagzhan (talk) 00:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Your edit to Kazakh Khanate has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

I know this rule. Please remove the warning. It's just a direct quote from the second sentence of the text, and it's clearly in quotation marks. I might be missing something, so I'd appreciate it if you could let me know. I usually try to write everything in my own words.

Kazakh khans preserved complete independence in dealing with internal affairs.27 In A. I. Maksheev’s words, “during the whole eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Kazakhs were Russian subjects in name only. In reality they preserved their independence. The Russians had to separate themselves from them with fortresses and troops and did not even dare to cross the Line.”28 The situation began to change in the 1820s. The Ustav o Sibirskikh Kirgizakh (Statute of Siberian Kirgiz29),promulgated by the Russian government in 1822, established a new administrative structure for governing the nomadic people of the Kazakh Steppe. The provisions of this legislation, on the one hand, included the territories of the Middle Horde (the largest tribal federation) in Western Siberia, and, on the other hand, incorporated all of Siberia into the Russian Empire

— Malikov

In A. I. Maksheev’s words, "during the whole eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Kazakhs were Russian subjects in name only. In reality they preserved their independence. The Russians had to separate themselves from them with fortresses and troops and did not even dare to cross the Line." The situation began to change in the 1820s. In 1822, the Statute adopted by the Russian government established a new administrative system for governing the nomadic population of the Kazakh Steppe. On the one hand, the provisions of this legislative act incorporated the territories of the Middle Zhuz (the largest tribal confederation) into Western Siberia; on the other hand, they integrated the entirety of Siberia into the Russian Empire.

— My version

GnuUserr (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

That content is still present in the article.

The edit I removed was this one, which is not in quotation marks, and is very similar to the source, according to the iThenticate report. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Explain your reverts

Hi, I have tagged you in a discussion at Talk:Timurid Empire. You recently made several reverts without explanation at Timurid Empire. While they may have been justified (I have explained why at the talk page), please always include an edit summary that explains the reason for your edit, especially it's reverting another editor. If you just revert someone with no clear explanation, it can look like you're being non-constructive and the other editor is unlikely to listen to you or to respect your revert. So please remember that next time. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 03:16, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I reverted to the consensus version of the map. If he knew the rules, he should have started a discussion on the talk page before making the change. GnuUserr (talk) 09:19, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I agree and I've been trying to explain that to the other editor. I'm not disagreeing with the revert, just strongly recommending that in the future you include an edit summary when reverting, so that it's clear right away to everyone that there's good reason for the revert. If the reverted editor becomes disruptive, it also becomes easier to report their behaviour to administrators (if necessary) because you can clearly demonstrate that the problem was communicated to them right away and they still ignored it.

In any case, Wikipedia only works well when editors communicate clearly with each other, so adding an edit summary is just a good habit to acquire in general. It doesn't need to be long, it can be just one word or a few words (e.g. "Unsourced" or "Not an improvement, please discuss at talk page first", or so on). R Prazeres (talk) 16:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ablai Khan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ablai Khan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Abuyev, Kadyrzhan Kabidenovich (2013). Yu. A. Sorokin, Kh. M. Abzhanov (ed.). Abilai Khan. Contemporaries and Successors: Monograph (in Russian). Kokshetau: Ereket. p. 308. ISBN 978-601-7462-03-01. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Why are you trying to edit war?

I don't understand why you are simply rolling back edits without any discussion or explanation. I invited you to a discussion to reach a decision, and you didn't respond. Isn't this disrespectful? I gave you the reasons for my edits. The Uzbek Khanate is part of the Uzbek khanates and statehood. This is also written on the Encyclopedia Britannica website. Why are you removing it? What about the Seven States? I told you that it is even written in the article itself as the Uzbek State. Why are you trying to start an edit war? I will complain about you. Mansamusamaliempire (talk) 01:38, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Are you doing an edit war again?

Why are you reverting my edits in the Abulkhairkhan article without any explanation? I wrote with a source. On the Encyclopedia Brittanica website, Abulkhairkhan is written as an Uzbek ruler. Why do you treat articles as personal property? This behavior makes you seem like you are the owner of the articles. Instead of engaging in a discussion, you are running away. I will report you to the administrators. Mansamusamaliempire (talk) 01:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Please keep your false accusations, if you want to report me, go ahead. But it's you starting an edit war. If someone reverted your edits, you should discuss talk page, instead of reverting your edits. GnuUserr (talk) 11:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Since you replied, I don't think there's any need for this. I don't understand why you are removing the [[Uzbek Khanate]] state from the Uzbek states and dynasties section of the [[Uzbek Khanates]] article. You are right. There is a difference between modern Uzbeks and them, but it does not mean that it is complete. It should be included for the sake of continuity. There is also a huge difference between modern Mongols and medieval Mongols. However, in the articles, the old Mongol dynasties are also included because of the continuity due to the "name". Another aspect is that this section is not only about Uzbek states, but also about dynasties. The Shaybanid dynasty is an Uzbek dynasty. This is even written in its article. In any case, the Uzbek Khanate should also be included in this list, even though it has a strong influence. The Russian Turkologist historian Alexander Nesterov, in his work "History of the Tatars from the Earliest Times in Seven Volumes", states that the Shaybanids were nomadic and later the Uzbeks of Movorunnahr. He writes that they are a dynasty and that there is a high level of cohesion between them, while Charles Kursman writes about the Uzbeks with excessive severity, saying that they are the successors of the originally nomadic "Uzbek Khanate", and that his treatment of Alisher Navoi is completely illogical, citing Navoi's hatred of the Dasht Uzbeks as the reason for this. In short, he should be removed from this article. I will edit and add him to the list for these reasons. Mansamusamaliempire (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2026 (UTC)