close
Jump to content

User talk:Kitamhal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Alexandra Panlilio (December 12)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by NoobThreePointOh were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Instagram and using parts of Wikipedia are not reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kitamhal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Austin (December 13)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Alexandra Panlilio (December 13)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Samantha Alexandra Panlilio

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, Kitamhal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samantha Alexandra Panlilio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Austin (July 25)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Wikipedia cannot reference itself and social media is not considered a reliable source. Please remove these. Any info that was reliant on those sources either needs to be removed or sourced from a WP:RS

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Charlotte Austin to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Charlotte Austin (model) has a new comment

[edit source]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charlotte Austin (model). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
yes please. I'd like to rename the draft from "Charlotte Austin" to "Thanwarat Charlotte Louise Austin" because another person already has the name "Charlotte Austin." I believe using her full Thai name will avoid ambiguity and make the draft more accurate. Could you please help me with the title change? Thank you! Kitamhal (talk) 06:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply