User talk:Local gen alpha
Add topicWelcome!
[edit]Hi Local gen alpha! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:
Happy editing! Mellk (talk) 12:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries, even if unintentional, as you did at Generation Alpha, you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, please refrain from edit-warring. Nerd271 (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- so you are silencing me for editing? that's crazy. you and other people only talk about the negatives of gen alpha. I am a gen alpha myself so please allow me to edit Local gen alpha (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Don't ghost me and answer my questions. it has been 1 month and you have not answered ANY of my asked questions. Do better and reply immediately after seeing this message. Local gen alpha (talk) 07:39, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Generation Alpha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Favonian (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- so i am not allowed to express myself huh? Local gen alpha (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. It's not so simple. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You have to be able to work with others. That's done through the consensus building process, which happens through holding discussions about disagreement on article talk pages. Repeatedly restoring your preferred edits without coming to a consensus is an easy way to get your account temporarily blocked, so please stop this immediately and start discussing on talk pages. Sergecross73 msg me 19:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- yes, but the article is overly negative and dread full to read. It only focusses on the perspective of reserchers, parents and marketers who scew perspectives to fit their own agenda Local gen alpha (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. It's not so simple. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You have to be able to work with others. That's done through the consensus building process, which happens through holding discussions about disagreement on article talk pages. Repeatedly restoring your preferred edits without coming to a consensus is an easy way to get your account temporarily blocked, so please stop this immediately and start discussing on talk pages. Sergecross73 msg me 19:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Gen Z protests
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gen Z protests, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Disco, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
