close
Jump to content

User talk:RCraig09

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Useful links, notes, templates, etc.

[edit]

Excel .xlsx spreadsheets that automatically generate XML code for .SVG graphics

[edit]

False or misleading statements by Donald Trump

[edit]

Please do not deliberately introduce no-target errors as you did here. While your intentions may have been good, you broke references in the text. If you want to get rid of those sources you will need to re-write the article to avoid using them. DuncanHill (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, a bad start to the year. My mistake was that I didn't appreciate there were Template:Sfn cites. —RCraig09 (talk) 21:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on 2026 in climate change

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 in climate change, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Christian nationalism image

[edit]

Hi RCraig09!

I don't know if you take requests, but would it be possible for a version of the image from this Axios article about the prevalence of Christian nationalism in the United States? I believe this would greatly serve as a visual aid for the page on this topic. Unfortunately, I am not as skilled with image editing to make this myself! BootsED (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@BootsED: I'm not an expert at map graphics, so I recommend you place a request at Commons:Graphic Lab/Map workshop. Best of luck. —RCraig09 (talk) 15:43, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the heads up! BootsED (talk) 23:58, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Talk:Illegal immigration § Requested move 25 February 2026

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Illegal immigration § Requested move 25 February 2026. Edittttor (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Graphing tool

[edit]

What tool did you use to create File:2017- Donald Trump veracity - composite graph.png? Did you have applicable work experience? Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 21:15, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Mandruss: Microsoft Excel --> export to PNG --> minor revisions and text additions in Photoshop Elements. Electronics engineer with a MS in computer science: I have been mostly self-taught in graphics. —RCraig09 (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yikes. I'm merely a retired software developer with a high school diploma. I don't have Excel or Elements, let alone know how to create a graph with them. Too old and tired to feel like that much of a learning effort. I want to create a graph showing how Trump's net worth changed over a span of years, as estimated by Forbes. Forbes has the most accurate, least biased estimates that we've run across so far.
Would you have any interest in collaborating with me on that? I could help find the data points in reliable sources (I don't think Forbes maintains the history in an accessible form). I ran across an independent graph showing Forbes' estimates for 2014-2024, but I failed to save the URL and now I can't find it. Also I would prefer a wider time span, since most of that time span was while he was in office. I don't wish to give the appearance of trying to make a political point with this graph ("look how much he has used the office to get richer!"). My goal is merely to provide neutral factual information and allow the reader to derive what they choose to derive from it. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 21:58, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
(I don't think Forbes maintains the history in an accessible form) - But I could be wrong. This comes directly from Forbes and would make a good Wikipedia graph. For now, my part of the work is done! Maybe the graph could be extended farther back using other RS, but that would be Phase 2. That should also be Forbes estimates, else it would be an apples-and-oranges graph; but it wouldn't necessarily have to come directly from Forbes.
I think we would be largely dependent on you to keep the graph updated with each year's new estimateunless you could find someone willing to assume that responsibility. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 00:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I would first add the graph to Wealth of Donald Trump. If accepted there, I would try it at Donald Trump. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 00:31, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Mandruss: I found longer-duration charts at this archive (slow to render) and this archive (faster to render, but from the deprecated archive.today)—both direct from Forbes. I'm very willing to do a chart, especially if this data looks acceptable to you. Let me know if you have further thoughts before I proceed, so there's no wasted effort. —RCraig09 (talk) 05:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Wayback one is a good find.
Some of those discrepancies are significant, probably any above 5% absolute. One could reason that Forbes graph 2 is more accurate, having been published three years later. Except for 2016 and 2017, that would work against Trump's favor (too bad for Trump). On the other hand, his 2016 and 2017 would look a lot better. I guess I'm suggesting that you use Forbes graph 2 for the years 2001-2026, unless you have a better idea.
The space for the years 1990-1995 should be spanned with one occurrence of the words "no data".
For the purposes of this chart, I don't think we need the numbers at the top of each bar as in Forbes graph 2. The vast majority of readers don't need that kind of precision; those who do can refer to the cited sources. From a UI standpoint, every visual element of the chart should earn its keep with a high bar. Just a Y-axis scale is enough, at perhaps $1B increments.
What do you think about using a line graph instead of a bar graph? Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 05:22, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Suggested image caption, short and to the point:

Trump's net worth for the years 19822026, as estimated by Forbes[1][2]

Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 09:26, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

This chart at |upright=1.2
Trump's net worth over time, as estimated by Forbes magazine[1][2]

I see you using |upright=1.5 for charts. I think that would be too much for the relatively short Donald Trump#Wealth, which is about more than net worth. (That existing image would have to be relocated or removed.) I might go as high as |upright=1.2 there. I say this because it might impact your choices for text size. Be careful not to make any text too small to be easily legible at 1.2, bearing in mind that some (many?) readers have poor vision. From MOS:SMALLFONT: "No text should be reduced below 85% of the page's default font size." This sentence is the recommended minimum size. This principle isn't often applied to text within images, but it should be imo. Accessibility is no less important with charts. Consider marking only every tenth year on the X-axis (1990, 2000, 2010, 2020). Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 13:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can we consult about typefaces before you start? Make me an offer. I have no particular preferences except sans serif. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 13:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Mandruss: I plan to generate a chart by the end of the weekend. Broadly, I agree with your suggestions above. Liberation Sans is acceptable on Commons from a copyright standpoint, as used in the Democracy Indices chart you have posted above. —RCraig09 (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I was kind of thinking that typeface would probably work. What do you think about using a line graph instead of a bar graph? Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 15:28, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Graphists would probably favor a bar chart (Forbes does). Line charts tend to communicate quantities that ~continuously change or have a definite ~smooth trend, while bar charts represent quantities of which we take periodic snapshots or that vary more spasmodically. While it is theoretically true that DJT's net worth varies from moment to moment (depending on the news of the day), for tax and accounting purposes such quantities are measured annually or maybe quarterly. Collectively, these observations favor a bar chart—which I will pursue. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Considered and mutually rejected. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 19:00, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Chart is uploaded in .svg format, with future-proofed caption and expanded footnotes. I used procedure described in User:RCraig09/Excel to XML for SVG. If there are no objections as to substance, I will post to article(s) within a few days. —RCraig09 (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
That was fast. Looks awesome. Love your understated color choice. If I wanted to be very picky (I don't), I would enlarge the X-axis labels a little, per earlier discussion here. I might bold the $xBs since they appear pretty "thin" at 1.2. Or make them black for maximum contrast on white. Somewhat more important would be enlarging the "no data" text, which I can't read at all at 1.2. So much for not being picky. Strategically speaking, I think I should do the BOLD at Donald Trump, and that only after acceptance elsewhere. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 00:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
In Version 2, I blackened and enlarged vertical axis labels to 45 pixels, and enlarged horizontal axis labels to 40 px. (In my hundreds of charts, I've treated 35 px as readable even without upright= designations.) Because "Data unavailable" is a side issue (what's important is the trend), I purposely reduced it so that casual readers wouldn't be inspired to read it; details are in the textual caption's footnote. I think it's ready for primetime. —RCraig09 (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 05:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For File:1982- Net worth of Donald Trump.svg, now accepted at two articles. Better quality than the Forbes charts on which it is based. Great aesthetics and not a pixel wasted. And fast! The problem with being really good at something: You may get asked to do it a lot. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 22:06, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Mandruss: Merci, danke, gracias, grazie, etc. and thanks for the suggestion to create the net worth chart. —RCraig09 (talk) 03:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

AI and AGI

[edit]

I've been watching a lot of related videos on YouTube. What are your thoughts? Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 07:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Mandruss: I don't know what you are getting at. In what context: Wiki content? Generating charts? Affecting democracy? —RCraig09 (talk) 15:08, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Affecting humanity. If you believe some of the experts, we're in for a colossal shitstorm very soon, if not collapse of civilization or extinction of the speciesunless we enact a pause in AI development to give us more time study it. Here's Bernie Sanders with a good 37-minute overview of the problem. He doesn't claim to be an expert on the subject, but he claims to take his ideas from expertsand the ideas are consistent with what I've seen from many of the recognized experts who lack a massive profit motive.
Dude, you don't have to keep pinging me from here. You have a guaranteed share of my attention for awhile. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 15:23, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
We're already seeing humans over-relying on AI, which does not articulate the ~reasoning underlying its conclusions or actions. Though I'm skeptical about the extreme view that AI will destroy humanity, a pause in AI development is about as likely as a pause in human avarice. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
a pause in AI development is about as likely as a pause in human avarice. Sure, but such a pause would be legislated, not voluntary. To whatever extent lawmakers don't own AI stock, avarice is not much of a factor. If lawmakers think it will improve their chances of re-election, they will vote for a pause.
I'm currently in the middle on this. I think collapse of Western civilization is more likely than human extinction, but I'm giving us only about 50 years. Glad I won't be around to see much more of it, but I pity my grandchildren. Mandruss  2¢. IMO. 02:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

POV graphs

[edit]

This isn't aimed at a specific edit of yours, it's just a pattern that I've noticed about your edits. A lot of the graphs you add give off a hint of WP:POV. This isn't saying there's anything wrong with the sources themselves, it's just how you present it. I'm not one to give my personal opinion on your edits or if it's wrong or right to do so, but I think you need to understand that it can be seen that way. CutlassCiera 00:10, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wanted to say hi!

[edit]

Hey, I saw your name come up in some recent watched thread and figured I should say hi! I didn't realize your email was down. How have things been going? Springee (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

'ello there @Springee: Is there a particular issue or suggestion that you want to raise? —RCraig09 (talk) 05:43, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, it was just one of those blast from the past things. Springee (talk) 11:38, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question about SVG chart spreadsheet logic/documentation

[edit]

Hi RCraig09,

I have been looking at your SVG chart spreadsheets, and I am interested in creating an open-source web application that would do something similar, but through a simpler browser-based interface.

My rough idea is to let users enter data and chart settings in a web form, then generate clean SVG output automatically, without needing to work directly through the spreadsheet. The spreadsheet system is very impressive, but the underlying logic is quite difficult to follow from the formulas alone.

I was wondering whether you happen to have any documentation, design notes, pseudocode, or other explanation of the logic behind the spreadsheets?

I would of course credit your work properly if I build anything influenced by your approach. No worries if no such documentation exists, but I thought it was worth asking. Windowellington (talk) 06:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Basic idea of using a spreadsheet to form text strings, this example being SVG code.
@Windowellington: The only detailed "documentation" I have is what's in the spreadsheets themselves, and what I've written in User:RCraig09/Excel to XML for SVG and User:RCraig09/Excel to XML for SVG/How to. Spreadsheets weren't designed for the specific purpose of assembling text strings, but I simplified the user's experience to a copy-and-paste procedure. It was a painstaking process to develop the formulas in each spreadsheet cell, and I don't envy the coder who will attempt to make an html-based equivalent. Sorry. —RCraig09 (talk) 14:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hey, RCraig! Any chance you can figure out the target for climate regime shifts at Super_El_Niño_events#Impact? Valereee (talk) 22:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Valereee: Tipping points in the climate system it is, methinks. I've inserted the destination article name. —RCraig09 (talk) 03:17, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Valereee (talk) 10:33, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is for all your contributions to the English Wikipedia since 2009, especially those related to the 2026 Iran war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, User:Pachu Kannan. The times demand our attention. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:44, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Professional Bowlers Association (PBA).svg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Professional Bowlers Association (PBA).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have replaced this graphic in the PBA Tour article and, on Commons, nominated another editor's two copyvio substitute logos for deletion. —RCraig09 (talk) 02:16, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Wealth inequality in the United States

[edit]

Hi, @RCraig09! Regarding the diagram discussion, I think it might be more productive if you try showing some examples of what you're looking for, or perhaps create some visualizations of your own. Keep in mind that @Timeshifter is just trying to improve Wikipedia as well. guninvalid (talk) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've done that, mainly in Charts 2 and 3. He doesn't seem to listen, and misses the point in what should have been a simple exercise. —RCraig09 (talk) 04:48, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

MOS:CHARACTERS

[edit]

Hi RCraig09. Re my removal of the 'Characters' section in the Warlight article, I believe MOS:CHARACTERS is clear: "In most cases, no specific section on characters is needed."

The exception "...if a finely crafted plot summary cannot capture this aspect of a story, a Characters section may be warranted" doesn't apply, since the plot summary gives good enough info about the characters. What are your thoughts? Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've continued this conversation at Talk:Warlight#MOS:CHARACTERS. —RCraig09 (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Regarding 2024 United States presidential election and educational attainment

[edit]

I used your chart on educational attainment and income to explain to readers how Kamala Harris won voters making over $100,000 a year. Most readers likely aren't familiar with statistical analysis of educational attainment, including applying it to voting behavior and income.

I understand statistics and polling better than most professional pollsters. As just one example, I don't think most polling firms use the likelihood-ratio test when designing polls. I do in my work in the biotechnology industry, when designing clinical trials. SmallPneumatic (talk) 01:56, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@SmallPneumatic: Thanks for the explanation. I understand there is correlation between Kamala voters and income, but the posting of this salary-vs-education chart isn't the same as voting-vs-salary. If you want to post the chart, I suggest that you provide a sourced sentence in the chart's caption that expresses the connection between (a) Kamala voters and (b) either income or education, whichever point you're trying to make. Of course, leave the sourcing footnote for the chart data itself. —RCraig09 (talk) 02:11, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see you're fairly new on Wikipedia. I find it useful to use the "Show preview" button to reduce the number of actual changes to a page. :-) —RCraig09 (talk) 02:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply