close
Jump to content

User talk:TonySt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 days ago by TonySt in topic Have you considered taking up a mop?

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello TonySt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Now, about WP:AIV. Feel free to put test4 on someone's page, but test5 should be for admins. Also, make sure you do the template right, and get the article name right. So it's {{vandal|IPaddress}} and the article was Christopher murt not Christopher Mutt (or at least the one I found). Wikibofh 22:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks, and sorry :-p--TonySt 22:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

tony this website is a joke and people are never going to find useful information if you spend all your time "fixing" that pointless page about a kid's life in chicago

[edit]

shame. ~2026-18720-01 (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

dont talk to my guy tony like that he's just doing his job (btw tony do you get paid?) ~2026-18846-54 (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
All Wikipedia editors are volunteers and do not get paid. This is a hard decision (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
lol real ~2026-37665-72 (talk) 03:10, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

re -

[edit]

Tony! Sorry for blacking out man. It's all cool. My main concern was with the toolbar's size and a noticeable drop in performance. Version 0.8 was really fast. Just got it hooked up and it's exactly the way I remember. Also, I confidently accept the "use-at-your-own-risk" policy :D ,, Congratulations on almost hitting 70,000 edits.‎ — B.J (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tetrachloroethylene is known to cause 20 to 30 different cancers in humans even at low amounts

[edit]

Many children and workers got cancer from just visiting dry cleaners once a month. ~2026-33988-08 (talk) 01:30, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I don't know anything about this chemical; only that the information you added was unsourced and you added it while also adding unneeded "citation needed" tags to various other things (like the name of the article). tony 01:39, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

StubHub.

[edit]

I’m updating my comment. I replied to what you sent me, but I don’t know if this is the official way to do it.

StubHub has faced regulatory scrutiny over its pricing practices, including a 2026 Federal Trade Commission action alleging deceptive ticket pricing and requiring the company to provide $10 million in consumer refunds. {{cite web|title=StubHub Refunding $10 Million in Fees to Consumers After Deceptive Ticket Pricing|url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/04/stubhub-refunding-10-million-fees-consumers-after-deceptive-ticket-pricing%7Cpublisher=Federal Trade Commission|date=2026-04-09}} Meredithjogavin (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Meredithjogavin. I think if you have secondary sources like news reports that talk about this, those would probably be better. The lead section (and especially the first sentence of an article) is definitely not the space for that information, and to be honest unless there's a ton of reporting about this I'm not sure where it would fit in the article at all where it wouldn't be undue. tony 00:37, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/stubhub-pay-10-million-settle-ftc-ticket-price-case-2026-04-09/
this is from 2024- https://people.com/dc-attorney-general-accuses-stubhub-of-duping-ticket-prices-in-lawsuit-8687659
Reuters reported that StubHub agreed to pay $10 million to settle FTC allegations related to deceptive ticket pricing practices in 2026. This was not the first time concerns regarding StubHub’s pricing practices were raised.
In 2024, the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit alleging deceptive pricing practices, including hidden fees and drip pricing. The fact that regulatory actions were taken in both 2024 and 2026 suggests that these issues were significant enough to attract scrutiny from multiple government agencies and widespread media coverage.
Given the independent reporting and the regulatory actions themselves, I believe this information is relevant to readers seeking a complete understanding of StubHub’s history and business practices. Whether it belongs in a History, Legal Issues, Controversies, or another section is certainly open for discussion, but I believe the information meets Wikipedia’s standards for inclusion. It is supported by reliable secondary sources that may have extensive coverage but does not change the fact that it comes directly from the government agency responsible for consumer protection and competition enforcement.
My goal is not to push an opinion about StubHub, but to ensure that readers have access to relevant, sourced information that helps provide a complete and accurate understanding of the company. Meredithjogavin (talk) 01:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Meredithjogavin, please don't use AI to communicate or write on Wikipedia. Can you tell me about your experience with their customer service? tony 01:50, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
What specifically makes you think it’s AI? Meredithjogavin (talk) 02:03, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Meredithjogavin, you can tell me if it isn't :)
I'm concerned about the shift after your initial edit, which seemed to be venting frustration about their customer service. When I asked for sources, your edits switched to a completely different negative topic about StubHub (one which you could find sources for), which I'm sure you understand looks similar to cherrypicking in an effort to push an opinion, as you said. tony 03:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi TonySt

[edit]

Dear TonySt,

You recently restored Nagabhata I to a sourced version after IP edits. Thank you for that.

I noticed the Historiography section was also completely removed from the article in that restoration.

As I am under 500/30 restriction, I cannot edit or discuss the article directly. You had advised me to ask you if I need any help.

May I discuss this specific section with you here on your talk page? I will keep it brief and only about content, not editors.

Thank you XaiverN9tewWike (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @XaiverN9tewWike! Since the removed section is about caste association, you are not yet able to participate in discussions about that content. If you have a suggestion for a simple and uncontroversial change (one which would not require discussion), your best bet is to leave a edit request on the article's talk page. You can read more about the extended confirmed restriction here at this link. Take care --tony 15:23, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @TonySt for the clarification. Noted.
XaiverN9tewWike (talk) XaiverN9tewWike (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Tony

[edit]

Just wondering if i can wiki on your pedia tomorrow night and dont listen to these other posts youre a lovely fella xx Saoreire72 (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Stop vandalism, Tony! Editors are done.

[edit]

You should stop vandalism of pages WikiUser153616 (talk) 15:15, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Stop,tony.You cant vandalize and change pages in Wikipedia.This area is not your playground.Stop annoying editors.Wikipedia is not intended for vandalizing. WikiUser153616 (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

[edit]

Nancy Guthrie page update

[edit]

Hello. The report was a random note sent to TMZ and it was reported by New York Post about 3 hours ago today. ~2026-36393-38 (talk) 17:18, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I left some information about this on your talk page -- if you have a reliable source, you can add it to the article with an inline citation. You can read more about Wikipedia's verifiability policy by clicking this link, and more about citing sources here at this link. Take care tony 21:20, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-26

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 13:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Baruipur (community development block)

[edit]

The Piali Town page has been moved by an editor to Piali (village). Accordingly, I made the edit. The Piali Town page now redirects to Piali (village). Gopal 2026 (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Gopal 2026, I'm terribly sorry, that was a misclick. I've restored your version. Thank you for letting me know! tony 05:28, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Gopal 2026, actually on second look, I did intend to revert your edit due to the description of the school as a very special one. In light of not reverting your other contributions at the same time (and having already reverted myself) I won't make any other changes, but that was the reason for the revert. tony 05:32, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Abusive editing: Vladislav Demchenko - next steps

[edit]

Hi Tony,

Just reaching out to you as you previously added a warning to user User_talk:Vladislav_Demchenko regarding their civility. They seem to be persisting in this (my talk page). Could you advise the next steps here? This is not something I've dealt with before. I have also reached out to some of the other editors who have given similar warnings. Thank you. Kylesenior (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Kylesenior. Unfortunately it looks like a pattern for them. I've left them (yet another) final warning. If it continues it might be a case for ANI. tony 15:46, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Kylesenior, I just noticed your talk page history is basically only this person harassing you over a long period of time. If it happens again and you're uncomfortable opening an ANI discussion please let me know and I'll open it on your behalf. tony 15:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Cyprus Emergency

[edit]

You deleted my updates in the Cyprus Emergency infobox page when I updated it with more accurate numbers, but without citations.

I don't know how to add citations in the infobox. Will you tell me? Antonevrisantonakis (talk) 20:31, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Since you're using the visual editor, this help page should be able to explain it better than I could. But the new numbers are so different than the existing sourced information, that you will probably want to open a discussion on the article's talk page first, or at least add it as a range (like ”187-1260 injured"), followed by inline citations to both the existing source and your new one. tony 20:38, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's because the information you sourced relied on the statistics published by 1950's British propaganda sources. Modern figures (released by the RAF's Air Historical Branch, and independent online databases) have the more accurate statistics. Antonevrisantonakis (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Islands in the stream edit

[edit]

I saw you immediately reversed an edit I made. I'm new to editing. just curious why? did I do something wrong? Stephenmwhite70 (talk) 22:27, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Looks like you saw my message on your talk page after leaving this message here, and then you added the info back but with a citation. I replied on your talk page just now but in case you read this response first: to answer your question, yes that looks perfect :) Thank you for your contributions and for the citation! tony 23:15, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tony quit bro no one cares you mug

[edit]

Call it wraps Tony it's only Wikipedia Gerald croft123 (talk) 23:35, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

John R. Kuhn edit

[edit]

Hey Tony!

I saw you immediately reversed an edit I made today. After review your reasoning for removal and checking my posts against wikipedia guidelines, I totally understand the reasoning for the reversal. Could you give me some guidance on adding information, I found the page after seeing an ad online for the page subjects book. I noticed the page was lacking information in general. Could you give me some direction on the right way to add information in this situation. I am very new to this kind of editing.

Thanks a bunch InfoSeekerTX (talk) 00:45, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Looks like you saw my message on your talk page after leaving this message here, and then you added the info back but with a citation. I replied on your talk page just now but in case you read this response first: to answer your question, yes that looks perfect :) Thank you for your contributions and for the citation! tony 23:15, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-27

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 11:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for your anti-vandal efforts! SHSR TC 05:03, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @SHSR! :) tony 05:08, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 13:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Antonio, it's your fav dude, now please, the one thing I hate is being ignored when I don't tease.

[edit]

I really did at least give you room to breathe. The least you can do, is at least answer an honest question. I just was having fun. I'm not this stud of a heel of a man, you take me for. Please. So, what's happening, here?

04:17, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ~2026-38752-94 (talk) 04:17, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Buddy? You were so talkative just a minute ago?! What's going on, brother? ~2026-38752-94 (talk) 04:19, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Wow, you really are one of the Illuminati's slaves, aren't you? I do take it back, you don't even have the guts to come clean with me, other than attack me. ~2026-38752-94 (talk) 04:37, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok :) tony 04:44, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edits on Nthanda Manduwi

[edit]

Hello Tony, I noted you undid my edits. All the edits I made were sources, with verifiable sources for all materials. Please feel free to review all the infomation. LKopa (talk) 04:59, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @LKopa! I reverted your edits because I didn't see any source for the added date of birth. Looking closer I'm a little concerned that your edits appeared to be creating something of a resumé instead of an encyclopedia article -- we generally can't use PR pieces or self-published sources to support achievements or accolades. tony 05:04, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello Tony, I wanted to update the article to show Manduwi's recently published books, and saw the article was missing information that I felt could be added from the articles I found online. I did not use any self-published sources, only Malawian media houses: https://mwnation.com/ntha-foundation-founder-releases-7-books-on-international-development/
https://times.mw/writer-serves-development-books-on-independence-day/ LKopa (talk) 05:08, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
This was the full list of sources, and I added several of them as I edited:
  1. Chitsulo, Lloyd (6 July 2026). "Ntha Foundation founder releases 7 books on international development". Nation Online.
  2. "2026 Africa Big Bets Fellows". The Rockefeller Foundation.
  3. "Nthanda Manduwi: creating jobs for youths". Nation Online. 27 November 2021.
  4. Banda, Sam (2026-07-07). "Writer serves development books on Independence Day". The Times Group. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  5. Reporter, Our (2018-09-27). "Beauty turns author". Nation Online. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  6. MLOZI, HOWARD (2025-09-17). "Author Nthanda Manduwi takes book launch to Unga". Nation Online. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  7. "Episode 111-Nthanda Manduwi on Ntha Foundation, Feminism, Digital & Innovation Industry, Life in U.S". Podcast Malawi. 19 March 2024.
  8. "Ruth Kulaisi Talks with Nthanda Manduwi, on work in America, Love & bridging the digital divide". Ruth Kulaisi talks... 19 March 2024.
  9. "Beauty turns shinning light on Malawi young female entreprenuers". www.nyasatimes.com. 20 September 2019.
  10. Mughogho, Lyonike (24 December 2017). "Malawians happy with Nthanda's World Miss University success". Malawi24.
  11. "Advances in Sciences and Arts". asa.must.ac.mw.
  12. "Why This Global Entrepreneur Chose the MSU MBA". broad.msu.edu.
  13. Reporter, Our (2017-10-19). "Miss Malawi princess lands television show deal". Nation Online. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  14. "Get to know Nthanda Manduwi". mipad.org.
  15. "Nthanda Manduwi: creating jobs for youths". Nation Online. 27 November 2021.
  16. "PPPC donates ICT equipment to tech hub – Digital Malawi Project". Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  17. Ethier, Marc (2025-09-02). "How An MBA And A Microsoft Internship Supercharged Her Mission For Africa". Poets&Quants. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  18. Foundation, The Rockefeller. "Rockefeller Foundation Launches First Class of Big Bets Fellows Focused on Africa". www.prnewswire.com. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  19. "Nthanda_Mandu at Google Books". www.google.com. Retrieved 2026-07-02.
  20. MLOZI, HOWARD (28 September 2025). "Nthanda Manduwi: Amplifying global youth voices". Nation Online.
  21. BBC News Africa (2025-09-27). What is the future of AI and work in Africa? BBC Africa. Retrieved 2026-07-02 – via YouTube.
  22. "TEDxMSU". www.ted.com.
  23. "Consumer Choice Awards Honour Malawi's Top Brands And Personalities". Slice magazine.
  24. "AFRICAN ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS". Channel A TV Foundation. Retrieved 2026-07-08.
  25. "Ambassadors 2024 – Africa Climate Ambassadors".
  26. Dalgety, Susan (2024-08-19). The Spirit of Malawi. Luath Press Ltd. ISBN 978-1-80425-147-8.
LKopa (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Which of these lists the date of birth you added? tony 05:17, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I admit that was my only error: the date of birth. But you reverted all edits. Were there any other errors you noticed? LKopa (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can I ask how you knew her date of birth? tony 05:20, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I had Googled it, and did not realise I had to cite for that specifically too. I started editing her page because I was reading her new book series which was just recently launched, and realised the page did not have the information for the news articles. For the birthday, I Googled it LKopa (talk) 05:22, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@LKopa, the date of birth was my main concern -- I am not going to revert you if you'd like to restore your version and then remove that date of birth (or find a WP:RS for it) :) tony 05:27, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much, Tony. Let me go and make that edit. I will do that, and let you know once done. I do appreciate you fact-checking - that had slipped my mind. If I find a more verifiable source in future, I will be sure to add that. Thank you! LKopa (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Tony, I have edited, and removed the DoB. Thank you again for fact-checking! :) LKopa (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey Stark

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping with vandalism with your cool tool, C.V.P.I.! Probably even the COOLEST tool of this 2026 I've seen so far. Just wanted to share this barnstar while you were away. Good luck! – SimpleObjects-9ei (talk / contribs / CentralAuth) 03:51, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks SimpleObjects-9ei! :) --tony 04:47, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aspen Acres Fire

[edit]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that the new edit i made to the article Aspen Acres Fire is sourced and accurate according to multiple news updates, if you have a question about this edit, you can leave another message in my talk page @WikiWildfire, thank you. WikiWildfire (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for re-adding the information along with an updated citation :) tony 19:14, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Depher

[edit]

hello Tony how do I send proof JamesWAndo1978556bb (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @JamesWAndo1978556bb! We can only use information from published, secondary reliable sources, like newspapers or news organizations. If those exist and directly state the information, they should be added as citations (click here to learn how to add those). If the source ("proof") isn't published by a secondary independent source, then we cannot use that information. tony 19:13, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
what if the information on here is already false and published as a malicious content, and I prove it's lies or malicious through the police, customers and verified fundraiser platforms JamesWAndo1978556bb (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
We cannot use those things as proof of the information you added. We can only use published sources like news articles. tony 19:27, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
what if it's proven that the reporter or publisher had lied, and it was a legally proven incident from a court or regulator like ofcom or news regulator JamesWAndo1978556bb (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Interceptor update

[edit]

Thanks a lot for the update, it is hard to check whether it is working as intended, due to the low activity, perhaps after the weekend. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 17:33, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Appreciated, let me know if you run into anything. tony 19:19, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit on Nelson - Pakistani rape gangs

[edit]

Reinstate the factual information on Nelson being under investigation for Pakistani rape gangs. Citations have been provided to you. ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 17:35, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/independent-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 17:36, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/66091/independent-rape-gang-inquiry-report ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@~2026-39273-28, these sources are inadequate to establish that it's notable. If there are multiple secondary sources (like news articles, think BBC or Reuters) which specifically highlight that town being "under investigation", then it might have a place somewhere in the history area but definitely not in the lead. tony 18:22, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
How is a national inquiry not notable? Whether or not a mainstream media comments on it is irrelevant. The fact that it is a national inquiry makes it notable, otherwise it wouldn’t be a national inquiry… ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@~2026-39273-28, if it's important enough to be in the article then it would have widespread coverage in multiple secondary sources. I also don't see that town's name in either link you pasted. tony 18:42, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The town (amongst others) is named in both the national and independent inquiries. I doubt that you have taken the time to fully review both of these documents. You can’t make a summary based on ignorance. As for media it’s been widely covered. ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
BBC:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ryv10l4jxo
Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/21/why-is-there-a-national-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs
Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uks-national-crime-agency-asked-investigate-grooming-gang-cases-2025-06-15/ ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 19:39, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Do you live under a rock? The inquiry is just starting. ALL effective towns and cities will be detailed on wikipedia. The estimated number of victims is more than quarter of a million children. ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 19:42, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
None of those media sources mention Nelson, even in passing. Just find the ones from reputable media where this specific town being investigated is the focus of the news articles. tony 19:43, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
BBC:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-68300484
Direct quote from article:
She said she was raped "possibly over a hundred [times]" by men "from all over the country" for four years.
"There was men from Bradford and Nelson and Birmingham, Blackpool… [the gang] took us everywhere," she said. ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 19:59, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I don't think there is any further way to clarify what I've already said: if you are going to say a town is "under investigation", you will need to cite published reliable news sources which specifically say that the town is "under investigation". tony 20:04, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
It’s literally listed in the governmental inquiry. This literally takes precedence over any media outlet because government…
I’ll just wait a few months for the investigation to take fold, and then update the page (again). With more citations (again). ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Financial Express:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg_bd64ClaA
Nelson mentioned at 25 seconds… ~2026-39273-28 (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Joanna Monro's mother

[edit]

The entry for Joanna Monro relies on misreporting in two contemporary (1957) newspapers of her actress-mother's real name. Could an Editor with an interest in genealogical research correct this, please?

After registering to FindMyPast.co.uk with free access the birth year of 1930 for Felicité Jan Shirley Barrington may be found. Her 1965 marriage to John C M McMichael may be confirmed, by selecting Advanced for the Civil Marriage & Divorce search and entering the spouse's names.

Joanna's mother's maiden name was registered as Monro when Joanna's birth (as Joanna Hale Monro) was registered, which was perjury under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953.

The truth is safely preserved in the General Register Office (GRO) indexes. Future biographers and serious historians will always look at the official certificates, and not rely on the current Wikipedia entry.

Thank you. ~2026-27137-36 (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

African wild/Painted dogs

[edit]

So~ How does one get the title changed? ~2026-39637-15 (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @~2026-39637-15! You may want to start a discussion at Talk:African wild dog tony 04:24, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Dearest tony. Please tell me you are able to put the edits I made back once the title is figured out. CamBawnBawn (talk) 04:31, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Lets not put the cart before the horse :) I should mention that the title we use on Wikipedia is generally the most commonly used name, not necessarily the name that specific organizations prefer. If you want the name to be changed you will need to check the references in the article to see what name they use for the dogs. tony 04:40, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The references would use African wild dog because the name change only happened in the last couple years. Key word being name change. If it's a search results issue, surely there's a way to fix that. CamBawnBawn (talk) 04:44, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
We typically use the term that most reliable sources use. If that term is still African wild dog then we might need to wait until the world begins using that new name. tony 04:48, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is the world... CamBawnBawn (talk) 05:31, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
You could read WP:RM to learn the process of requesting an article be moved to a new name, and then file an appropriate request on the article's talk page, using the correct template, as outlined in the RM instructions. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

Tech News: 2026-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Interceptor user script

[edit]

Hi TonySt! It's been a long time since we've talked! I hope that you're doing well and that life is treating you kindly. :-) I had a question about your Interceptor script (located at User:TonySt/CVPI.js). At the end of your code, you add a portlet link to the interceptor run page that's located at the personal top menu of links for everyone, but you don't set the parameter to have the link appear in front of a different menu item so that its location is consistent for everyone (example: nextnode:"#pt-sandbox" or nextnode:"#pt-preferences"). With that parameter left unset, the link to the interceptor run page will end up being placed after the "Log out" link, which throws everything off for me. I'm just curious and wanted to ask: is there a reason that you don't specify this parameter? Adding one of the examples I listed to your code should result in the interceptor link being placed before the sandbox or preferences link, respectively. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Oshwah! I'm doing well, and I hope you are too :). The addPortletLink parameters were set up initially very early on during development, and it's not something I thought about much after getting it working. I've just made a change, and next time you refresh you should now find it comfortably above the preferences link, at least on non-mobile. It's one of the (probably many) UX things that I become blind to over time, and I appreciate you showing it to me, and also offering a solution :) Thank you! --TonySt 18:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
TonySt - Thanks for the response! I'm doing okay myself; I've been busy with life-related tasks for awhile, and they're starting to make me go crazy. :-) Awesome! Thank you so much for making that change! I can confirm that the nextnode parameter that you added to the 'p-personal' addPortletLink() function call now consistently displays the Interceptor link before the user preferences link. This will make my wiki life much easier. :-) I really appreciate the change! I'll definitely let you know if I find anything else that I think could use an update or an improvement code-wise. In the meantime, back to work I go! :-D Take care - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:40, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Warning users for unsourced BLP edits (and regarding Interceptor)

[edit]

Hello again, Stark! I have just noticed in your contributions that you use {{uw-unsourced}} while reverting unsourced BLP edits using C.V.P.I. I recommend using {{uw-biog}}, which makes it more obvious that the user has edited a BLP instead of a standard article in where uw-unsourced can be used. Have a nice day, and good luck coding that! – SimpleObjects-9ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 19:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh yeah Stark, also be careful when a user uses C.V.P.I. to revert an edit of a user with a highly offensive or egregious username, as Interceptor is set to warn users after reverting an edit using it. One time I saw this kind of thing to happen was in Argentina national football team when Hamimh2 reverted an edit of an offensive username and we don't want to waste admins' time having to revdel the creation logs of the "User talk:Grossly offensive username" pages. SimpleObjects-9ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 (see talk) 23:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! A tip: after an editor is reported to AIV it stops using their username in edit summaries, and no longer warns the editor unless you choose a level in the dashboard. Also, if you manually report an editor to AIV via the dashboard, CVPI does not mention their username in the edit summary of the report to AIV. If it's an LTA with an offensive name, I usually just manually report via the dashboard before making any reverts (and I usually don't revert them more than once per article). TonySt 23:47, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

dawg, just let me vandalise🙏🙏🙏

[edit]

I believe i am a donut ~2026-40612-12 (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

let me c=vandalize kuzhal pwease ~2026-40612-12 (talk) 05:28, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase

[edit]

The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 05:44, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mehboob Studio, you may be blocked from editing. Есливлазс (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The da Vinci Barnstar
Thank you for creating one of the greatest Wikipedia tools of all time! It makes RC patrolling so much easier, and works identically on mobile! Axolitl (talk | contribs) 05:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Appreciated Axolitl :) I'm happy to hear that it's helping. Thank you for patrolling recent changes! --TonySt 15:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Restore Britain on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 20:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Recent Edit Reversion

[edit]

Recently, you reverted an edit of mine on Screaming Bloody Murder as you assumed it was a test edit. However, it was not a test edit, instead it was a minor edit updating some grammar that was likely left over from before the album's release. I changed "is" to "was," and I also removed a comma as there was only one name after. Wonderful Lemons (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Wonderful Lemons! Thank you for reaching out. You changed ”have" to "hae". TonySt 03:47, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh. Sorry, that was a typo. Wonderful Lemons (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Rick Santorum

[edit]

For what it's worth, the Santorum quote was in the wrong place in the article, but it's entirely real and very sourceable. "We have to make the best out of a bad situation." Jan. 20, 2012 interview with Piers Morgan on CNN, during his run for president. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:13, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I reverted because it wasn't properly sourced, not because it was untrue. TonySt 01:20, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:01, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Emory Tate

[edit]

Hi, I saw your message. As a chess player, emory tate is undisputely one of the greatest chess players and any chess player will tell you that, unfortunately these gentlemen keep on revoking my edit for reasons I am unsure of. ~2026-41795-39 (talk) 04:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I tried to defend you when Mario was labelling you a vandal, but you're not making this easy. Stop trying to add stuff when it gets reverted. Go to the article talk page instead. Wikipedia is not the free for all anarchist project that it used to be. I know Emory Tate has his fans but he wasn't an all time great or anything like that. He was a master with highly variable results due to his double-edged style. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 04:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! On Wikipedia, details about people need to be supported by a reliable source. If published reliable sources do exist, we can add them as inline citations so readers can verify the information themselves. You can read more about Wikipedia's verifiability policy by clicking this link, and more about citing sources here at this link. Take care. TonySt 04:39, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Message

[edit]

Information icon I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It may take some time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you. Please do not bite newcomers. You keep reverting my edits without putting anything on the talk page. I understand you thought that a brief quotation was a copyright issue but Zi fixed that by using the wikipedia template for dictionary.com  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-41649-10 (talk) 05:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! As I mentioned on your talk page, you cannot copy text from your sources. Everything you contribute here needs to be written in your own words. Please do not copy and paste text from copyrighted sources, even with a reference. --TonySt 05:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Message from FoxyBushtail4783

[edit]

Why did you remove what I added to “List of Last Words(21st Century)”? Tyler’s were from Instagram and Frickers on google FoxyBushtail4783 (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Foxy! On Wikipedia, things we write regarding people need to have citations to reliable sources so the reader can verify the information. You can read more about our verifiability policy by clicking this link. Take care --TonySt 17:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

Have you considered taking up a mop?

[edit]

LuniZunie(talk) 17:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Definitely a candidate I would be willing to support. +1! Lynch44 21:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Very appreciated Luni & Lynch! It's not something I've given much thought in the past... Maybe someday :) TonySt 22:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
You've only been here 20 years; do you think you have sufficient experience? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Been here longer than I've been alive... LuniZunie(talk) 15:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Truthfully I imagine most editors, myself included, can't ever be completely certain of whether they themselves are experienced enough for the bit, regardless of years. It's something only other experienced users can judge, really. The only thing I'm sure of is I will never stop finding new things to learn about the project. --TonySt 18:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Man. I've gotta admit. Tony's one of the reasons I started getting into anti-vandalism. He's literally a grade A+ editor and it will be super awesome to see him help out with the blocking here.‎ — B.J (talk) 04:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Tony's one of the reasons I started getting into anti-vandalism
Me too. LuniZunie(talk) 04:39, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
That means a lot, I appreciate it BJ & Luni! TonySt 16:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:44, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply