User talk:WikiMacaroons
Add topic
I removed "approximate" and added {{c.}} to the birth year c. 570. It appears the death date is known. Also undid the change to JC's birth year from 0 BC to 6 BCE. Probably should be 6 BC There is no year zero (except in astronomy). Cheers Adakiko (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Adakiko - Rather strange to "correct" some information wrongly and then qualify your own wrongness with "alleged", isn't it. Great spot, thanks! WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 20:50, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hello? Haymhirsh (talk) 01:06, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Deletion review for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike McVey
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike McVey. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ~2026-36939-5 (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
RfD relisting
[edit]Please slow down on relisting at RfD, you're relisting discussions unnecessarily. Note that per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete.
All those film award discussions would fall under that category. They should be deleted when an admin comes around, not relisted. Furthermore, discussions like Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 6#Collection of verse that have already been relisted twice without further participation shows that nobody else is interested in this discussion and it's ripe for closure. -- Tavix (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Tavix: So sorry, I assumed it worked just like AfD, thanks for letting me know. Sorry for cluttering up the log today. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 19:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
The article has certainly been improved during the AfD, and the only two !votes after the relisting were both Keep. But I'm not convinced we can ignore the seven earlier Deletes. Since deletion is a possible outcome here, this AfD isn't suitable for a non-admin close. Can you please revert your close? Thanks! Owen× ☎ 00:21, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @OwenX: - the reason I closed that discussion is because though there were many delete votes they all mostly made the same points, and I felt the keep votes outweighed them, especially since after Nnev66 found sources people subsequently voted to keep on this basis. I looked through the sources myself and judged them to be appropriate to keep, but if you feel like there's still a question mark over it, then I'll revert my closure now, sorry. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 00:40, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you! I understand why you closed it that way, and it may very well end up being closed the same way by an admin in the end. I just want to avoid the situation where the close is contested as a BADNAC. I'm sure you understand. Thank you for all your help at AfD! Owen× ☎ 00:49, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Deletion review for Occupation of Palestine
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Occupation of Palestine. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —BrechtBro (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
