close
Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here  discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header (dark green when in dark mode) appears under each daily section  it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Broad Peak
Broad Peak

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles featured in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting items marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, post the item and change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, close the discussion section and change the header to (Closed). If the article's quality remains poor, leave a brief note explaining why to encourage and assist others in fixing it.
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Structure

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived.

To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


August 8

[edit]

August 7

[edit]

Viruses generated by AI

[edit]
Article: Evo (AI) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  The AI Evo is used to systematically design and generate viable bacteriophage viruses for the first time. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera,BBC, FT, Guardian, NYT, Science
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: There's widespread coverage of this breakthrough in which a genomic AI was used to design viruses which were then created and tested. I didn't find a suitable article initially and so have created one. Note also that the US government issued a "New U.S. Government Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research" last week... Andrew🐉(talk) 22:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Oppose Not again.... I don't think any of the trivial science factoid deserve a blurb. NotKringe (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose, new medical treatments are researched daily, but until they pass regulatory review and approval it's just hype for a particular set of models. Stephen 01:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Mecca Joint Defence Agreement (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey sign a trilateral collective-defence pact, the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement. (Post)

 UCinternational (talk) 13:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Support on significance. Setarip (talk) 23:12, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: William Orbit

[edit]
Article: William Orbit (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: English musician and music producer ~2026-43389-23 (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Support. Article is sufficient quality and sourced. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) Thailand school shooting

[edit]
Article: 2026 Nonthaburi shootings (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  Shootings at a school and a residence in Nonthaburi province, Thailand, kill at least 9 people and injure 15 others. (Post)
News source(s): CNA Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Four dead, 15 injured in Thailand school shooting.  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-43588-17 (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Support. Nine fatalities is a lot for a school shooting. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support While "school attack" in Thailand is not that rare, a school shooting commited by student and with this much casualties is unprecedented. Still, I think the article needs some touch before posting. NotKringe (talk) 08:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support per above This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 08:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support High death count, unusual location. Setarip (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Admins willing to post ITN: BangJan1999 14:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
The shooting is mentioned on the Debsirin School article, so I am not sure why this is misleading. Natg 19 (talk) 02:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
What I think is misleading is that the Debsirin School page is about the boy's school in Bangkok, wheas Debsirin Nonthaburi School is a unisex school in Nonthaburi, which is a completely different place. NotKringe (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I've changed "Debsirin School" to "a Debsirin School branch" which I think makes the relationship clearer. Left guide (talk) 02:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 6

[edit]

RD: Jerney Kaagman

[edit]
Article: Jerney Kaagman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Nu.nl
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Singer of Earth and Fire ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Not Ready as the discography is unsourced. Snosibsnob (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Death was announced yesterday (August 6). Article needs a bit of work, but is largely cited. This is actually my first nomination, heh. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ready) RD: Sydney Towle

[edit]
Article: Sydney Towle (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times, People USA Today.
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Towle was an American social media influencer best known for documenting her journey with cancer. She died on August 5th, but it was announced on August 6th. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Support Well-sourced - and if you don't nominate for DYK I will.--Launchballer 16:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I plan to write my noms for the week later today! I'd love your eyes on this and/or others. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Launchballer: nommed her. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Definitely agree. I added her name to 2026 deaths in the United States and List of Dartmouth College alumni. RIP Sydney Towle! ~2026-43402-61 (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 5

[edit]

RD: Daniel Bernard

[edit]
Article: Daniel Bernard (businessman) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Retail Detail, Le Monde
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: French businessman, former CEO of Carrefour. Article looks good sourcing-wise but is a bit short. I plan to expand the section about his time a Carrefour because currently it’s only 1 sentence. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 12:08, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ready?) RD: Philip Ruppe

[edit]
Article: Philip Ruppe (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Minigazette
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced. Death announced on this date. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Got a source that isn't WP:NEWSMAX?--Launchballer 21:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Yahoo TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I tried and couldn't find one so far. The Yahoo ref is actually just the same as the Newsmax article, but just using Yahoo as the "aggregator"? (dunno what it's called) Natg 19 (talk) 03:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I see, but I feel if Yahoo is reusing it, it should be reliable no? TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 05:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Syndicated content takes on the reliability of its original publisher, in this case Newsmax.--Launchballer 10:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Natg 19: & @Launchballer: Found another obit from his funeral home I believe -> New obit. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
"Ruppe, the Republican who represented Michigan's 11th District from 1967 to 1979, died in August 2026 at 99, according to Newsmax." I don't think so.--Launchballer 15:31, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Launchballer:: found another one Obituary :) TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Looks like WP:UGC to me.--Launchballer 16:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Launchballer: Here’s another one too. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Are you trying to be funny? It says right there "Source: Wikipedia public record" ~2026-37099-58 (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
How about The Daily Mining Gazette? https://www.mininggazette.com/news/local-news/2026/08/farewell-to-an-icon/ -- PFHLai (talk) 01:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I was just gonna bring that one up @Launchballer: & @Natg 19: TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
This source looks fine to me. Natg 19 (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Closed) SpaceX lunar impact

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
The trajectory of the booster   , Moon    and Earth   .
Article: 2026 SpaceX lunar impact (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  A Falcon 9 rocket stage hits the moon near its Einstein crater. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYT
Credits:

Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: This is about to happen in 20 minutes and is getting live coverage as the impact is a sure thing. The image is a placeholder as I'm hoping that there will be some good PD images of the plume from NASA. Note that it's good to alert people in advance about astronomical events so they have an opportunity to view them as they happen.

Note also that there is some scientific significance as the BBC explains, This is exciting for scientists, because we know it's happening, and we know the speed and the mass of the rocket stage that will crash into the Moon. We don't normally know that for meteors that crash into the Moon every day. That means scientists will have a lot more information as they study the debris that will be caused by the collision. By studying the light that is reflected from that material, scientists can determine its composition - helping them understand how the Moon has developed and how planetary systems evolved and were formed billions of years ago. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

The nomination explains that the picture is a placeholder. It’s the Einstein crater which has an interesting backstory. See also pics or it didn’t happen. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Snosibsnob (talk) 16:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose The impact is not planned nor it was for scientific purposes. Even the blurbed article barely has enough content to explain why this is significant to begin with. NotKringe (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose really? at a loss for words for this one. Should we make articles for all the S-IVBs that crashed into the moon too? Scuba 02:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
This is not correct. We cannot post anything that is at AfD on the main page, so until that is closed, this article is not postable. The article does not have any other major issues. Usually, orange and red level tags are considered major enough to block posting to ITN. (From WP:ITNBLURB) Natg 19 (talk) 01:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose Now that the article has been expanded to start-class, and I've done a bit of copy-editing on it to get a feel for it, I am not convinced that it is of sufficient quality for a frontpage feature on ITN. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. Setarip (talk) 12:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Pure science trivia. Interesting to some, but trivial. Harizotoh9 (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

August 4

[edit]

RD: Dory Funk Jr.

[edit]
Article: Dory Funk Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): LA Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: WWE Hall of Fame wrestler. R.I.P. ~2026-43386-47 (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Robby Albarado

[edit]
Article: Robby Albarado (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): DRF
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Two-time Preakness Stakes winning jockey. R.I.P. ~2026-43386-47 (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Bruno Campanella

[edit]
Article: Bruno Campanella (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Il Messaggero
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Italian conductor, especially for Bel Canto opera. The article was a sourceless stub. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Lloyd Robertson

[edit]
Article: Lloyd Robertson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CTV
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Canadian journalist and anchor for CTV National News. Useless Niamh (talk) 15:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ready) Buyout of Electronic Arts

[edit]
Article: Leveraged buyout of Electronic Arts (talk · history · tag)
Blurb:  The $55 billion leveraged buyout of video game publisher Electronic Arts by a consortium led by the Public Investment Fund is completed. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Video game publisher Electronic Arts was purchased by the Public Investment Fund in a leveraged buyout.
News source(s): The Verge, BBC, CNBC
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: deal was completed today after all regulatory approvals. Masem (t) 21:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Oppose the quality is there, however I don't see how this is notable enough. It's the PIFs biggest acquisition, but they are throwing a lot money around, especially in the entertainment sector. While it is the largest leveraged buyout in history, I don't really see how that's notable, especially given that it's not very large compared to other recent acquisitions and mergers. There also doesn't seem to much, if any impact, on the games industry, especially with the precedent from Microsofts acquisition of Activision. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 02:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose This topic is not notable enough considering ITN is for global events. CatPerson987 (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    ITN isn't "for global events," but also, this literally is a global event. An American company that trades throughout the world is bought by a Saudi organization? I mean, there's no ITN requirements for a subject to be internationally relevant, but this is as international as ITN items get so I am confused by this statement. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose I'm not seeing the significant coverage. Yes, there is a BBC article, but I don't see it in the scores of articles on their main page. It is however number 8 in their business section, where the lead is a Starbucks promotion in Korea.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfitz (talkcontribs)
    we dont use placement of news relative to print or web sources as a metric, only that it is in the news. But this is also a general problem on business mergers, that the news attention is typically at the onset of the announcement to merge, and not when it actually happens. Even here, there was more news coverage last week when when the final regulatory approval ftom the EU was granted, making the actual completely a point of trivia from a news standpoint but under ITN, the point where we would normally post. Masem (t) 12:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • "expected to be completed ... around June 2026. As of January 2026, the transaction was reported to be in its final stages." Article doesn't seem to be appropriately updated yet. I think we should have high quality standards for featuring articles of this type. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I know yesterday it was more clear the deal was approved, done one seemed to have removed that. Masem (t) 12:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I've returned that statement as well as eliminated the unneeded paragraph now that no longer applies. Masem (t) 12:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    Support Thanks, Masem! I think we need more detail about the implications (analysis?) of this merger, but either way, we have an in-depth article on a subject that is on Reuters and the Guardian, so all seems good to me. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    have added an impact section as layoffs are projected along with a refocus on popular franchises. That will likely be fleshed out in the coming weeks. Masem (t) 15:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    The "Closure and impacts" is short but great. A fine example of the kinds of improvements I hope ITN can inspire and I hope it can be expanded more. Currently, the Responses section only has responses from 2025. Ideally, this would be updated as well. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
    I can tell you in following the story that since it was considered inevitably going to go through (at least, considering within the US and who was involved) that the deal being completed didn't raise a lot of further opinions (Again, why I think that business mergers need to be considered at the point of the announcement when the most coverage will be, rather than the conclusion, barring lawsuits or regulatory body denials to prevent them, but that's not the point here). Also, no actual factual events have happened that we can document yet. There's rumors flying of studios being sold off but not from any yet reputable sources (compared to the Bloomberg source for the likely layoffs). Even with the Microsoft/Activision merger, it wasn't until weeks and months later that the impacts started to be clear. Masem (t) 11:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support - big news in the gaming industry, which is one of the largest forms of entertainment out there. Quality is there and we serve a purpose to our readers by posting this. — Knightoftheswords 12:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Since this is some of the most high-profile takeover by the PIF in quite awhile, and is getting noticable buzz due to the clashing "inclusivity" public image between EA and PIF. NotKringe (talk) 23:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support Not just significant in the gaming industry, but also politically with the PIF. Article is good. Vetrenarisisum (talk) 03:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support on notability While I agree with some of the oppose comments that LBOs and other business deals are normally not significant enough for ITN, the instrumental involvement of Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund (PIF) in buying out Electronic Arts makes this an unusual event. As QuicoleJR points out, this carries importance for both the gaming industry worldwide and Saudi Arabian foreign policy and fiscal policy. Oppius Brutus (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support Significant transaction that has large implications for the video game industry as well as political importance due to PIF involvement. Article is in good shape for ITN. MidnightMayhem (talk) 18:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose on notability. It's not on the front page of https://www.nytimes.com/section/business/dealbook, https://www.bbc.com/business, nor anywhere on Aljazeera.com when I try searching. It's clear that this is just industry relevant but not broader relevant. This is routine business happenings, we don't post all the business news on this page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 19:20, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
we do not require nor expect ITN items to be front page news, nor are news on the front page necessarily good ITN items. Masem (t) 20:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
It shows you that it's not really in the news. Also, it's not even the largest gaming buyout ever: per the BBC article cited in the nom, "The deal ranks as the second-biggest acquisition in gaming history, after Microsoft's $69bn purchase of Activision Blizzard, the company behind Call of Duty..." The fact that it's an LBO is not significant for our audience - it just means that PIF borrowed money to complete the transaction. The BBC article cited in original nom is pretty detailed but the Verge or CNBC article are both pretty scant on analysis. Overall this is a nothing burger in the broader financial world. I suppose it's important in the Saudi financial world but cmon our scope as Wikipedia is larger than that. This subject is not big enough to merit inclusion on the front page. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
See my above comment, it's abotu the 68th largest corporate buyout since the 1990s. This transaction simply isn't big enough or wide-reaching enough to merit significant ongoing coverage (reminder that this is a criteria for ITN inclusion is that the effects will last a while and can be covered by sources. What more is there for journalists to say about this??).QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 02:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
How many of those 67 buyouts were subject to a stand-alone article in our encyclopedia? Even if they all had been of sufficient public interest to warrant an article, I think ~2 ITN features each year about a massive financial buyout would've been fine. But we only post what we write anyway, and this is one we've written. It's a bit of a WP:OSE argument to oppose an article because its subject doesn't win in the total numbers game. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I don't oppose posting because it fails the numbers game. I oppose the posting because it is not notable enough outside a specific industry segment. I'm merely pointing out that one of the arguments in favor of posting, ie. that it wins the numbers game, is merely Wikipedia:HTRIVIA. The difference between a LBO and a regular M&A transaction is just trivia. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
ITN is not a news ticker, we do not rely on what other news sites or newspapers are putting at the top of the headlines. Its also been as long as its covered in some way by recent news. And outside of print, we cannot judge topic placement on websites due to numerous things (personalization, geolocation serving, etc.) We just require that it is covered in reliable news sources and the article properly updated to reflect. And also, many of those RSes identify this as the largest known leveraged buyout to date, with EA taking on $18b in debt (at a interest rate of $1.8b a year) that they have to cover. Masem (t) 11:48, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
RSes identify this is a very large LBO yes but the difference between LBO and any other merger & acquisition is, in my view, not important enough to merit an article on the front page. To make a sports analogy this is like saying a player achieved the highest batting average ever or the most number of interceptions ever. It's just financial trivia that yes contributes to notability, but not enough to merit a front page slot. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 14:19, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
That's a poor analogy. Those two records have stood for 100 and 50 years, respectively, and are effectively unassailable. The active leader in interceptions has less that half the record, and he's 37 years old. GreatCaesarsGhost 16:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 3

[edit]

RD: Paula Alí

[edit]
Article: Paula Alí (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Cuban stage, film, and tv actress. Died this Monday in Havana. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 06:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Mateusz Bąk

[edit]
Article: Mateusz Bąk (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Polish footballer, Lechia Gdańsk legend. Article very undercited and I have orange tagged it, needs updating on his post-playing years and death, but plenty of sources available if any of the footballing editors would like to expand the article. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Jimmy Cricket

[edit]
Article: Jimmy Cricket (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Northern Irish comedian. ItsShandog (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 2

[edit]

(New) RD: Tsurumaru Tsuyoshi

[edit]
Article: Tsurumaru Tsuyoshi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Japanese racehorse, winner of the 1999 G2 Kyōto Daishōten, last prominent offspring of Japanese Classic Triple Crown winner Symboli Rudolf. Article was published from Draft on date of death announcement. Might need some more work for sourcing, albeit sufficient in my view. GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 21:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Rod Liddle

[edit]
Article: Rod Liddle (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Controversial journalist whose later writings were provocative (to say the least) along with some, er, interesting events in his personal life. Article is orange-tagged for neutrality but no serious discussion on talk page for nearly two years so that can probably be removed (and I note his most famous outrageous quote isn't even mentioned in the article!). Article is pretty-well sourced, there may be a few odd statements. Black Kite (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

POV tag was removed a matter of minutes before you posted here and the "shag the kids" quote had been removed about an hour ago. I readded it in a way that was actually due. I also added a couple of cn tags.--Launchballer 15:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Kay Granger

[edit]
Article: Kay Granger (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Texas congresswoman who once was the Chair of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. Very fresh news, so article may need further updating. FlipandFlopped 01:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Agreed, more info about her tenure as mayor of Fort Worth is needed. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 1

[edit]

(Review needed) RD: Nadhira Al Harthy

[edit]
Article: Nadhira Al Harthy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Killed in the avalanche, looks ready. Natg 19 (talk) 18:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Natalia Dontcheva

[edit]
Article: Natalia Dontcheva (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Independent
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Bulgarian-born French actress. Article is pretty bare bones so hope it can be improved in time. Useless Niamh (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted separate blurb and RD) 2026 Broad Peak avalanche & RD: Nirmal Purja

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: Nirmal Purja (talk · history · tag) and 2026 Broad Peak avalanche (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers, including Nepalese-British mountaineer Nirmal Purja (pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: Nepalese-British mountaineer Nirmal Purja is killed along with nine others following an avalanche in the Pakistani Himalayas.
Alternative blurb 2: In Pakistan, an avalanche on Broad Peak kills ten climbers. (This leaves Nirmal Purja, Nadhira Al Harthy, Pur Bahadur Gurung and others for the RD line as separate ITN candidates.)
News source(s): The Kathmandu Post
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Nepali mountaineer known for record‑setting speed ascents. ItsShandog (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Merged nom - ArionStar (talk · contribs) nominated the broader avalanche article a few hours later, so I've merged it in here. Support, receiving sustainable news coverage, in the news, Purja seems to be a "top of his field" sort of character, so both the incident and his article should be bolded per WP:ITNRDBLURB. — Knightoftheswords 15:32, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support alt blurb as the avalanche and Purja are notable. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Vincent Pastore

[edit]
Article: Vincent Pastore (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: American actor. Best known for his role in The Sopranos. CantBelieveINeedAnAccount (talk) 02:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Not yet ready Several unsourced paragraphs and unsourced acting credits section. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: