close
Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship/Members

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you would like to be a member of Wikipedians against censorship, please add your name at the bottom of this list:

  1. Socrates1357
  2. Kaldari 19:57, 20 August 2005 (UTC)reply
  3. --Gorgonzilla 21:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)reply
  4. Zoe 22:46, August 20, 2005 (UTC)--Jarashi 01:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  5. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 02:38, 2005 August 21 (UTC)
  6. Redwolf24 Hell yes! (Insert image of autocunnilingus here) (See WP:BEARD for a group trying to censor Jimbo's beard)
  7. Karmafist 04:12, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Kaldari, let's keep this up regardless of what happens with WfD.reply
  8. Lomedae 08:20, August 21, 2005 (UTC) Of course.
  9. I'm not sure this project is such a good idea (polarization and all), but I agree with the aims. ~~ N (t/c) 22:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)reply
  10. Hipocrite 23:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Wholeheartedly.reply
  11. OfficerDibble 10:08, 22 August 2005 (UTC) The fight must go on citizens, do not rest.reply
  12. NickGorton 01:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Great idea!reply
  13. Oldak Quill 14:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)reply
  14. Dmn € Դմն 01:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)reply
  15. --ShaunMacPherson 15:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC) When people were trying to delete the auto ######## images without offering justification I knew that a project like this would be necessary and am glad it is now created.reply
  16. Serodio 22:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)reply
  17. KrisW6 KrisW6 19:14, 12 September 2005 (UTC)reply
  18. Clawed 03:28, 14 September 2005 (UTC)reply
  19. Brian1979 02:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)Most definitelyreply
  20. WikidSmaht (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC) Very well. Let us see what we can do.reply
  21. Piecraft (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2005 (UTC) I will do my best in light of everything to oppose malevolent censorship.reply
  22. Jobe6 03:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC) Their wikiproject should have been deleted.reply
  23. Groyn88 I support the inclusion of any iota of information which is not absolutely false, malicious, defamatory or directly harmful. Let's create a flexible peoples' encyclopedia which reflects human diversity and freedom of expression.Groyn88 08:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)reply
  24. Merovingian {T C @} 08:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC), Why not?reply
  25. Purplefeltangel 17:20, 23 October 2005 (UTC) Yup, I'm in both Encyclopedic Merit and this WikiProject . . . why? Because I feel that there is a fine line between "expecting quality" and "censorship" and while we should always expect quality, it should never cross that line.reply
  26. Tom 08:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
  27. Danny Yee 01:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC) some people consider bare ankles indecentreply
  28. Adam Clark(User_Talk) (email) 05:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC) For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The concept of censorship is not only disturbing, but is also dangerous.reply
  29. Mushroom 00:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  30. Metta Bubble 11:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  31. Jquarry 02:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC) Count me in. There's too many PC N#zis and bubble-wrappers in the world.reply
  32. Rogue 9 06:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC) "The attempt to silence a man is the greatest honor you can bestow on him. It means you recognize his superiority to yourself." -- Joseph Sobranreply
  33. —BorgHunter (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Absolutely.reply
  34. ¿ WhyBeNormal ? 21:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  35. Fantom 18:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  36. Kerowyn 10:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  37. Megamix? 03:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  38. Kickboy 02:33, December 25, 2005 (UTC)
  39. Ouuplas 16:55, 25 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  40. Seancdaug 02:24, 27 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  41. Aumakua 09:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC) "When the official organ of a purportedly scientific society plays thought police by censoring scholarly work to appease the politicians, it ceases to deserve the allegiance of a rational mind." -- Paul E. Meehl. (I apply this in a much broader sense: When [anything] plays thought police by censoring scholarly work to appease [anyone] it ceases to deserve the allegiance of a rational mind. May Wikipedia forever avoid that condition.)reply
  42. Rainmonger 15:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  43. Useless Fodder 08:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Censorship is the foundation of subjugation.reply
  44. Ronline ✉ 08:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC) - It is absolutely draconian and contradictory to attempt to censor Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.reply
  45. BostonMA 02:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  46. Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  47. The JPS 20:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  48. CCMichalZ 21:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  49. Werdna648T/C\@ 21:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)reply
  50. Zilog Jones 04:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  51. —Andux 13:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  52. Madashell 15:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia should include any information that fits into its role as a free encyclopedia, any policy which attempts to censor material on the grounds of "decency" (i.e. personal taste) is contrary to the purported aims of Wikipedia.reply
  53. Paul 12:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  54. Brian New Zealand 21:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Agree all the wayreply
  55. Thryduulf 22:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  56. Copysan 05:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) And Proud of it!reply
  57. Wisco 14:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC) -- People who want to control words and images want to control thought.reply
  58. DrIdiot 19:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC) -- There are enough people in society telling us what we can say and what we can hear. Let wikipedia be free of the shackles of the ambiguous and subjective guidelines of decency.reply
  59. Sean (talk || contribs)
  60. dirtyliberal 05:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship has no place in an learning environment. Wikipedia is the ultimate learning environment where the only currency is knowlegde. To tolerate censorship would be to tolerate a cancer growing on ones soul.reply
  61. Masonpatriot 06:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  62. Irongaard 08:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC) -- People who do not want to be offended should avoid all forms of mass media and stay inside, rather than trying to force the entire world to conform to thier views.reply
  63. MatthewKeys 21:37 16 January 2006 (Pacific) -- We need a place free of censorship. Not everyone can be on a TV show and voice their opinion--but everyone can contribute to Wikipedia and use the Internet.
  64. Dudewheresmypizz4 14:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC) I now realise that censorship is ignorance.reply
  65. --ChrisRy5 22:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Support your freedom of speech on Wikipedia!!reply
  66. Nortonew 06:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship seeks to suppress information. The absence of information is ignorance. Thus censorship seeks to promote ignorance. Wikipedia's mission is directly contrary to the promotion of ignorance.reply
  67. Jeff Silvers 19:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship is arbitrary and counter-productive to the ultimate goal of Wikipedia.reply
  68. • Dussst • T | C 20:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC) - Freedom of speech is one of our fundamental human rights. Lets ensure it survives on, and applies to, Wikipedia!reply
  69. Shell 03:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  70. Hermeneus (user/talk) 11:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  71. Noble Skuld the Legend Killer 18:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  72. Ibaranoff24 23:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  73. Gala.martin 00:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia should include any information that fits into its role as a free encyclopediareply
  74. Schultz 15:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC) I support this with all of my heart!reply
  75. helohe (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  76. Brokenfrog Fully against censorship of relevant content.
  77. Amherst5282 00:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  78. almightylinuxgod 01:55 Jan 26th 2006 - Wiki for everyone!
  79. DMichel 19:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Censorship does not belong here.reply
  80. robsteadman 00:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC) I am appalled that there is censoring going on in some articles and repression of verifiable fact when some editors don;t like it. This is an encyclopedia - it should contain verifiable facts not POV opinions.reply
  81. Kelisi 16:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC) There are far too many self-appointed censors here. I have personally undone some of the damage that they have wrought.reply
  82. Iamvered 04:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Censorship is a weapon of the small-minded to unfairly control what they cannot understand. Wow, that sounds good. Quote me!reply
  83. Chairman S. 07:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  84. --Oz Hutton 16:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)reply
  85. ZoBlitz 04:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  86. Ombudsman 09:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  87. Vanky 12:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  88. Halcatalyst 21:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  89. getcrunkjuicecontribs 19:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  90. CoderGnome 21:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  91. REDTURTLE -- 15:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  92. Tomyumgoong 03:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  93. Luis María Benítez 15:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  94. DanielDemaret 17:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  95. Matt White 20:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  96. Armon 01:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  97. LordRevan 02:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  98. Moriane 17:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC) What a great group! Sign me up.reply
  99. ‣ᓛᖁ♀ᑐ 05:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC) It's been long enough since the initial debacle.reply
  100. Cnwb 05:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  101. OrbitOne 09:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  102. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 23:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  103. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  104. rmosler 11:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  105. Frenchman113 01:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  106. USER-cacophony 20:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  107. Stainedglasscurtain 21:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  108. Ross 17:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  109. Discordance 14:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  110. Kasey54 15:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  111. The Republican 20:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)reply
  112. Zdunne 02:50, 27 Febraury 2006 (UTC)
  113. e-user 06:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Truth and censorship cannot coexist.reply
  114. Daniel Morris 14:36, 2 March 2006 (GMT)
  115. user:Richardkselby
  116. User:UKWiki 16.47, 4th March 2006 (GMT)
  117. Wwagner 21:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC) The day you stop learning is the day you die. Censorship is death!reply
  118. myselfalso 04:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  119. phonzonappy If we dont know the truth, then what do we know? 21:08:36, March 7, 2006
  120. Dee ayche! 22:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  121. Acebrock 20:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)anti censorship, works for me considering the censorship by the government.
  122. Funnybunny 17:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  123. J.A. Terranson 1234H, 12 March 06 - Wikipedia is fast losing it's moral courage, authority, and in the end, it's relevence.
  124. User:Theorb March 13, 2006
  125. VJ Emsi 21:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Hell yes.reply
  126. HolokittyNX 08:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC) The justification for this group's existence, based on protracted and logical examination of Wikipedia's goals: DUUUUH! ,,,^..^,,,reply
  127. --Nicholas 18:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  128. --Procrastinating@talk2me 21:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  129. Me join -- 127.#.#.1 18:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  130. Zavandi 13:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  131. NeoChrono Ryu 22:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  132. Atul Malaviya 12:45 PM, 22 March 2006 (IST)
  133. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] - 04:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  134. Chebab 17:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  135. Mirlen 02:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  136. User:Killswitch Engage2.50 March 2006 (MT)
  137. Ramanpotential 03:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  138. --WhiteRhino 05:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Censorship is the beginning of the age of misunderstandingreply
  139. Khatores 01:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC) We don't need anyone to wipe our diapers anymore; censorship is mommyism.reply
  140. Loom91 11:03, 29 March 2006 (UTC) We must fight against the attack on humanity called censorship.reply
  141. Aldoliel 21:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Information wants to be freereply
  142. --Ariel al-Qasid 16:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  143. Why censor things. Our Bodies=Nature. acfan-Talk to me 00:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)reply
  144. Noetic Sage 20:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  145. Pc13 07:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  146. Osbus 22:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)- People in support of censorship can go start their own encyclopedia.reply
  147. Sfacets 07:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC) / fighting against censorship is a start...reply
  148. Samurai Drifter 22:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC) / What kind of idiot would SUPPORT censorship?reply
  149. Bubby the Tour G 02:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC) / Bring back the Brian Peppers article!!! And stop letting The Man put down YTMND fans contributions!!!reply
  150. SteveB 03:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Censorship of the Justin Berry article without a compelling reason strikes me as arbitrary, capricious, and anti-wikireply
  151. Zowayix whatever the time is (UTC)
  152. Oregon Bear 09:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  153. A. Kohler 02:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC) Censorship is against the purpose of the Wikipedia.reply
  154. Objectivist-C 23:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC) The only offensive thing is an assault on the truth.reply
  155. SURIV 23:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC) "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."reply
  156. Switch 17:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  157. Motoma 23:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  158. User:Richman271 The "sum of all human knowledge" is not possible with censorship 16:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  159. User:Bgriffin 20:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  160. Southpaw018 10:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) I wish I had the RL time to help fight this fight. Alas, I lend only my voice. I hope it is better than nothing.reply
  161. General Eisenhower I like Wikipedia
  162. Terror Island 02:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  163. Hezzy 21:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  164. Vidkun 12:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  165. Meneth 08:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  166. Andy123(talk) 15:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  167. Knucmo2 - Censorship is an unfair monopoly on thought and as a result distorts the decision making process.
  168. Amcfreely 19:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  169. MPN 11:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  170. —porges(talk)
  171. Barneyboo (Talk) 14:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC) - the only way we can make Wikipedia open and aspire to achieving NPOV is with an honest and complete exploration of human knowledgereply
  172. _-M o P-_ 07:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC) What is wrong and what is right in terms of vulgarity is based on point of view. Also, to discriminate one type of information against the other would be unencyclopedic.reply
  173. --DB0 10:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)reply
  174. User:Galoshes
  175. Nnp 22:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  176. Beno1000 00:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  177. Zippokovich 16:06 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  178. User:Elizmr
  179. User:Dave04
  180. UnDeadGoat 23:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  181. --Michael Johnson 04:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  182. Sushi4u
  183. User:DJac75
  184. --Fragolino - (Follow the white rabbit!) 19:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  185. Alan 05:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  186. Gyre 06:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC) - I don't know how much help I'll be, but I'm giving my support!reply
  187. Nowimnthing 12:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  188. Josie dethiers 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  189. Cicero Dog 13:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC) i have been blocked for my right to feedom of speech! Now i shall exercise it yet again!reply
  190. BurningZeppelin 08:16, 22 May 2006 (EST)
  191. Revoish 10:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC) -- Damn right. Censorship makes baby Jesus cry =(.reply
  192. Samurai Drifter 04:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship is just... plain... retarded.reply
  193. furrykef (Talk at me) 18:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  194. Caprosser 01:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  195. // The True Sora 04:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  196. altobliz 01:29, 29 May 2006 (GMT)
  197. Korinth111 22:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  198. Guinnog 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  199. CAPS LOCK 18:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)reply
  200. Prefixcaz 05:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  201. User:Jimmy C--Jimmy C 12:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Let's tell 'em where to shove their censorship....reply
  202. Vincentvivi 06:42, 02 June 2006 (GMT)
  203. Gibbsale 8:36, 02 June 2006 (EST)
  204. JoeTalk!WorkEspMail 19:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  205. Zuwiki // talk 05:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  206. Darwin's Pug
  207. .t. 18:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  208. SushiGeek 18:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  209. EMC 20:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  210. InGenX 10:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  211. Warhorus 16:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  212. Ruaraidh-dobson 23:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC) Let's get <bleep> on their <bleep>s!reply
  213. Karimarie 01:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  214. Flamarande 21:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC) "Freedom of Speech not only means that we have the freedom to say what we like to hear. It also means that other people have the liberty to say things we despise and hate."reply
  215. Mwhorn 03:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC) It's all relative. =]reply
  216. SaturnYoshi 01:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) The FCC is ruining peoples lives.reply
  217. Jason Palpatine 22:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  218. MoraSique 06:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  219. jhfireboy 18:02, 9 June 2006 (BST)
  220. jmsevits 05:38, 10 June 2006 (EST)
  221. Moose 09:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  222. James McNally 10:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  223. --Lord Snoeckx 10:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  224. --Ted 14:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  225. Cathryn 14:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC) I'm furious about this userbox deletion business. Are you guys working on this at all, or do I go somewhere else?reply
  226. Tal :) 09:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Likewisereply
  227. --SigmaX54 03:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  228. Superior1 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  229. Stepan Roucka 15:26, 22 June 2006 (CEST)
  230. Rlk89 23:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  231. Osloboslo 10:37, 26 June 2005 (UTC)reply
  232. —Dananimal 22:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  233. Nqnpipnr 13:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  234. Kane77 22:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  235. Outlyer 00:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  236. Chicadi 23:07, 29 June 2006 (EST)
  237. S.Skinner 19:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  238. Akaces23 01:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  239. Killfest2 Sometime, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  240. --Qwerty qwerty 16:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  241. Jarashi 01:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  242. Disputed one 5:51 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  243. Cipher Destiny
  244. Goodnightmush 12:55, 5 July 2006 (EST)
  245. --Skully Collins 13:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  246. Scienceman123 03:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  247. Wjhonson 01:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC), Fight Religion-based Censorship and the History Nazis! Notability is a guideline, not a requirement.reply
  248. Rsquire Rsquire 15:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  249. --Milliteq 07:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  250. Penelope D 02:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  251. --William Pembroke 16:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  252. Blackmissionary 10:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  253. --~VNinja~ 00:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  254. ).m41ku 16:25, 14 July 2006 (PST)
  255. ).User :the pink panther6:07 pm july 15 2006
  256. Sfacets 01:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) -- Keep banging on the walls!reply
  257. --Neural16:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  258. --Patrick 04:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  259. --Scarlet woman 12:41, 20 July 2006 (CET)
  260. Jum4 10:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC) -- Go GO GOO!reply
  261. Maraud 22:49, 23 July 2006 (GMT+1)
  262. FaerieInGrey
  263. Kitia 20:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC) I want to join as many wikiprojects as possible!reply
  264. Funnyfarmofdoom
  265. Hmrox 17:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  266. Dipics 01:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  267. Joel Llewellyn 02:19, 30 July 2006 (BST)
  268. --Kinghajj 01:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  269. --theblackBay -Theblackbay 05:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Please Learn History!. Please Learn about the Bond system! Please understand the Fraud. come to me for info.reply
  270. --Davin Bacon is a proud member.--Davin Bacon 00:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  271. Fatalserpent 01:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  272. Tempestdevil 08:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  273. NightSky 18:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC) -- Happy to help!reply
  274. Jeffklib Say YES to freedom of speech!
  275. Doc ♬ talk 04:09, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  276. Bandgeek100
  277. Atomaton 12:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  278. — [Mac Davis] (talk)
  279. Krushsister 06:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC) : Free speech is a noble cause.reply
  280. EthnopunkEthnopunk 14:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  281. Maltelunden 17:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  282. Anthony J Fuchs 14:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC) -- "Someone who wants to control what you say is someone who wants to control what you think."reply
  283. Athanatis 06:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) - Keep Wikipedia free in more than one sense of the word.reply
  284. Húsönd 01:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  285. Whiskey Rebellion 03:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Same as what Anthony J Fuchs said - later for censorship.reply
  286. Ibagli
  287. ~Inkington 19:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)reply
  288. 0L1 10:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  289. Durova 19:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC) I've supported this project's goals for long enough. Might as well join it officially.reply
  290. Dan027 07:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  291. Ivan K 07:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  292. USAOwnz I support freedom of speech!
  293. LaneRendell 20:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  294. RiFF 0:14, 13 september 2006 (UTC)
  295. Rougeblossom 13:33, 13 september 2006 (UTC)
  296. sthomson 21:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)We have the right to free speech and the responsibility to practice self-restraint.reply
  297. Appraiser 16 September 2006 In the business of disseminating information, censorship has no place.
  298. Feureau Censorship breeds ignorance: China, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Middle East, United States.
  299. Xtifr tälk 14:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  300. Prolog 11:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  301. Tjss(Talk) 16:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  302. --Maelnuneb | Talk 19:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  303. Astroview120mm 01:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  304. Dylan Lake 04:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  305. Effer 23:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)reply
  306. Knutars Speak freely at Free Talk Live
  307. IshangoF**k the censorship sh!t!!!!!--Ishango 18:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  308. Fighterx
  309. We don't care about such petty stuff such as censorship. Just keep things the way they already are. --lEoN2323 22:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  310. Kevin Ray Chua || talk || contribs 04:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC) STOP WIKI CENSORSHIP!reply
  311. Sasha l 18:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  312. Davin Bacon 02:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC):Your Godreply
  313. Icarus 23 00:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  314. ReverendG 04:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  315. Freedom. Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . 3 05:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  316. SSPecter 18 October 2006
  317. Terrasidius Yeah man screw the bubble wrappers!!! 00:47 19 October MMVI {UTC}
  318. Caris42 17:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC) No Censorshipreply
  319. Merkinsmum 20:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC) In particular, to stop the PR machines of wrong'uns removing criticism from articles.reply
  320. Kelvingreen 23:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  321. Orpheus 09:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC) - Censorship is wrong, no matter what the subject.reply
  322. DJSupreme23 - Peter Bjørn Perlsø 19:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC) - Censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored.reply
  323. NekrosKoma 9:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  324. seifip 10:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  325. Wiki Raja 21:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  326. TrevorLSciAct 02:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)"All censorships exist to prevent anyone from challenging current conceptions and existing institutions. All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. Consequently the first condition of progress is the removal of censorship." ~ George Bernard Shawreply
  327. Cocoaguy 18:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Its the 1st amendmentreply
  328. Arikwithana 21:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  329. --WW79 20:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC) - I don't believe an unabridged dictionary is censored.reply
  330. Sambob joe 12:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  331. Disinclination 01:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  332. Kendrick7talk 07:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC) I was starting to think I was all alone out herereply
  333. The suicide forest 21:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Sure, I'll join. Any noteworthy information should be made available to the public, and every issue should allow both sides to give their story. Censorship in Wikipedia is wrong.reply
  334. Aexon79 01:26, 19 November 2006 (CET) I definitely agree with the virtues of wikipedia against censorship.
  335. Danaimband 04:17 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  336. samillia 14:18 19 November 2006 (EST) No censorship! It is against the policy of wikipedia.
  337. --Andre(Talk) 01:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  338. Bojan 15:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  339. CL8 03:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  340. Information Center 10:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  341. --Injinera 19:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  342. JayJasper 16:32, 1 Decemember 2006 (EST)
  343. The Anonymous User
  344. B3radley 2:04, 03 December 2006 (UTC)
  345. siarach 19:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  346. Beggarsbanquet 17:40, 3 December 2006 (EST)
  347. WP:NOT censored, what more is there to say? Seraphimblade 00:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  348. Lord Gravitron Message | Contrib 15:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  349. DirkvdM 07:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  350. Dskluz 06:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  351. TaranRampersad 21:05, 7 December 2006
  352. Somitho 04:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  353. Tanaats 17:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  354. Willie the Walrein-talk to me 23:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC) - Is this an encyclopedia of indistinct knowledge or what?reply
  355. Squad'nLeedah 23:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Ill be in this, i believe in responsible reporting, but this isnt journalism, its a wikipedia and anything educational or relative needs to be includedreply
  356. Dommedagsprofet 19:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC) This is what Wikipedia is all about!reply
  357. James Brown[citation needed] 23:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  358. Ehouk1 00:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC) - NPOV cannot be censoredreply
  359. Murderbike 02:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)reply
  360. Susiekins
  361. tremewanbill
  362. User:Zahir13
  363. User:Plattler01
  364. User:Tiger Marc Tiger MarcROAR! 01:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  365. ZombiesNTea 04:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  366. aniki21 17:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Libre is just as important as gratis.reply
  367. Zadernet 06:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  368. Lucy-marie 23:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  369. Nateland 11:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC) damn I hate censorship, and this place needs to have the LEAST of it.reply
  370. Nina Odell 05:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)I've recently added the entire "articles of low importance" category for Wikiproject Sexuality and Sexology to my watchlist. I encourage others to do the same.reply
  371. Leonidaa 11:17, 11 January 2007
  372. Cailil 13:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  373. Johnalden --Johnalden 03:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC) freedom of expression is essential to all.reply
  374. Iotha 19:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  375. Oleway
  376. --Redlock 20:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  377. James Altman 00:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  378. DTGardner 17:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  379. Wooyi 22:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC) I support freedom of expression.reply
  380. tom-da-bomb 11:02, 24 Janurary 2007 {UTC}
  381. Raystlyn 04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)reply
  382. User:AmeliaMayKingston 15.10, 28 January 2007
  383. MiraFirefly 06:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC) "Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself." - John Stuart Millreply
  384. Charles Baynham 23:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)reply
  385. Wolphii 00:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC) The only way an encyclopaedia should be.reply
  386. ErikB 03:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)reply
  387. Misou 19:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)reply
  388. Newtown11 11:54 10 February 2007 (CMT) I support freedom of expresion, religion, speech, choice, and diversty everywhere, not just Wikipedia. And so should you.
  389. koolone i hate those ####### stars
  390. Hojimachongtalkcon After a horrid experience at Talk:Muhammad
  391. OMGitsMonica 2:48 EST, 16 Februrary 2007
  392. Awadewit 10:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC) I am not in favor of a partialpedia.reply
  393. Yahel Guhan 03:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)reply
  394. Pavithran 07:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)|Talkreply
  395. SeriousCat 04:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)  :)reply
  396. WassermannNYC 03:52, 24 February 2007 (EST) -- after a horrid experience at the List of Jewish American businesspeople article, I now fervently oppose those rogue administrators that like to censor and slant/skew certain articles (mostly Jewish-themed articles); I like to call them "administraitors" because of their betrayal of the spirit of the entire project.
  397. Laverick Phoenix 01:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC) -- Censorship distorts education and causes an impotence of the brain.reply
  398. East Stirlingshire 21:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC) -- Censorship obscures the truth.reply
  399. Destructo 087 04:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  400. HerkelThebrave I definitely want to join! I'm sick of people complaining about whether or not an article's "appropriate." Censorship is the first step of tyrrany and is terrible for learning.
  401. numbbelligerence 04:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  402. Joanna 23:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Expression should be neither repressed nor suppressed!reply
  403. Alastair Haines 10:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  404. Stabby Joe 18:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC) - The internet is the one of the few places you can't silence truth, lets keep it that way!reply
  405. Panagiotb 22:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC) - Censorship defies the meaning of a true Encyclopedia!reply
  406. Randomfrenchie 04:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  407. Eog1916 08:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  408. Ferdia O'Brien The Archiver And The Vandal Watchman (Talk) 15:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  409. CA387 08:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  410. Timocrates 18:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  411. Kritt 06:37, 28 March 2007
  412. ColinLRtalk 20:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)reply
  413. ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 14:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC) - Censorship is the bane of knowledge, fact. This is an encyclopedia, the personification of knowledge.reply
  414. abexy 05:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)reply
  415. TortureIsWrong 03:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)reply
  416. Djmckee1 18:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)reply
  417. User: Ianleck4
  418. Pokey Little Puppy 11 April 2007
  419. VanTucky 00:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)reply
  420. Viktym 22:07, 12 April 2007 (CST) Censorship distorts reality. It also obstructs the First Amendmant Rights to U.S. Citizens. Land of the FREE!
  421. Ketsuekigata 23:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)reply
  422. SelfStudyBuddy 08:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
  423. Luigii249 19:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  424. StephenHjellum13 00:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  425. Bubya 19:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Boo Censorship!!!reply
  426. Gordonov 17:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  427. HalHal 03:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  428. DieWeibeRose 23:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  429. C3pkeogh 20:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  430. Cdogsimmons 19:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Yes.reply
  431. J. D. Redding 02:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  432. SAS87 --SAS87 19:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)reply
  433. Larklight 12:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Censorship in all forms is interlectual sloth and ethically unacceptablereply
  434. Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits) 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Censorship removes the truth. A breast is totally acceptable for a child's eyes, as long as there is discretion.reply
  435. Slyferret 07:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)reply
  436. St.daniel Talk 19:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)reply
  437. Yamaka122 22:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)reply
  438. Blueboy96 14:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC) As a journalist by training, I consider censorship the eighth deadly sin.reply
  439. Stefano Cortinovis 10:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)reply
  440. Michael J Swassing 04:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)reply
  441. SilkTork 17:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)reply
  442. Chris 14:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC) If the American left gets their way with the Fairness Doctrine, they will stop at nothing to silence the rest of information that is out in this country.reply
  443. SalaSkan 12:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC) absolutely. It's a pity that I didn't see this WikiProject before. SalaSkan 12:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)reply
  444. Kerilka 13:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
  445. Morphyoss 03:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply
  446. WacoJacko 07:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)reply
  447. Soulrefrain 04:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)reply
  448. Soyseñorsnibbles 24 July 2007
  449. Coconuteire 15:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
  450. DorothyBaez 6:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  451. Abcdefghayden 13:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  452. Tdreher 14:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  453. Shruti14 16:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Agree w/ aims/goals, just don't go too far and allow illegal activity, false imfo, etc and we must maintain quality to keep Wikipedia an acceptable primary resourcereply
  454. Matthew2c4u Agree with Aims, Some information may be considered indecent by some but when there is disputed cesorship should not be considerdMatthew2c4u 12:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  455. Tornwarrior88 17:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC) We must stop censorship now!!reply
  456. - Zeibura (Talk) 10:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  457. </Dave> 20:19, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  458. dominik92 August 2007
  459. Jacob 17:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  460. DavidJJJ 09:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)reply
  461. bitplane 28 August 2007
  462. Delta40 07:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)reply
  463. paulytlws
  464. Jared Hawkley 18:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Three cheers for free knowledge! Hip hip hooray!reply
  465. Morfal 08:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Keeping up the good work!reply
  466. NerdyNSK 03:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)reply
  467. Bdhook 20:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)reply
  468. Souseiseki42 şœśэїŝәқι 02:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)reply
  469. Ka5hmirTalk To Me! 11:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)reply
  470. Blkprf 20:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)reply
  471. Mrmattkatt 01:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)reply
  472. Designdroide 4:22 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  473. iulian28ti - Any attempt to censor Wikipedia or avoid NPOV should be punishable by death 19:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)reply
  474. RaidonMakoto 19:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)reply
  475. MgCupcake 03:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  476. wooerfara3661 01:28 GMT, 7 November 2007
  477. Welland R 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  478. Phyesalis (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  479. (Noneforall (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC))reply
  480. 86.136.216.177 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  481. Jack?! 16:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  482. Pi 17:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  483. Paulshannon (talk) 15:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  484. --STX 03:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)reply
  485. Acs4b T C U 18:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC). Censorship is actually a violation of one of Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia aims to be a free encyclopedia, and by censoring "vulgar words" or certain parts of the body, we are obviously preventing Wikipedia from reaching that target. Instead of censoring body parts, I strongly suggest that a template warning all users that the article contains "inappropriate images and words" be created. Plus, just because I am against censorship, that doesn't mean I support profanity!reply
  486. SamuelRiv (talk) 19:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)reply
  487. Karonaway (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC) I agree that censorship is ftl!reply
  488. Mytomi (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)reply
  489. mms (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)reply
  490. Urban Rose (talk) 02:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)reply
  491. Aktb (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)reply
  492. Hanter (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)reply
  493. William P. Coleman (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Censorship is indecent!reply
  494. Typing Monkey - (type to me) 16:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)reply
  495. Da bomba3 (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)reply
  496. Adamshappy (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)reply
  497. Fuzzform - I came across this project after witnessing the Muhammad fiasco unfold. Whether or not a person takes offense to the sensory information being presented to them is entirely irrelevent in all cases here on Wikipedia. As Acs4b states above, "Censorship is actually a violation of one of Wikipedia's policies."
  498. NoMonaLisa NoMonaLisa (talk) 06:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)reply
  499. Yoda317 Censorship is wrong, people deserve to be shown things in grim reality
  500. TostitosAreGross - Censorship denies the reader of the true nature of situation and therefore is less educational.
  501. Max.diems (talk) 02:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)reply
  502. EmilyELewis Censorship only contributes to ignorance
  503. RFG17 (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Censorship blind us!reply
  504. Ben (talk) 20:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)reply
  505. 224jeff6 Talk 15:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Censorship is bullshit because life is uncensored!reply
  506.  - oahiyeel talk 05:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)reply
  507. YoungWebProgrammer msg 01:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)reply
  508. нмŵוτнτ 23:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
  509. Joshuarooney (Talk) 10:31 5 March 2008 (GMT)
  510. clpo13(talk) 10:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)reply
  511. pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)reply
  512. skribb (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)reply
  513. QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 13:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)reply
  514. Enric Naval (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC) swear words, certain images... should not be removed because someone feels ofendedreply
  515. NocturnalA6 2.7 (talk) 04:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Censorship is sometimes important, but not when you want the world to know the facts.reply
  516. Legianon (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC) If you don't want the truth, close your eyes.reply
  517. Emil Kastberg (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)reply
  518. Cambrasa (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)reply
  519. User:Master Genk
  520. AC+79 3888 (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)reply
  521. Ryan shell (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC) (let's censor the censoring so there are no censors)reply
  522. FogDevil 00:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)reply
  523. Cybiko123 (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)reply
  524. User:Faizaguo(talk)
  525. Seanor3 18:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Against censorship in all its forms, Especially in Videogames.reply
  526. Connorflanagan Of course.
  527. MisterB777 (talk) 18:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC) I whole heartedly support the goals of this project and defending legitimate content from overzealous editing in the name if "decency".reply
  528. --AnotherSolipsist (talk) 20:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Everything except WP:N and WP:V is irrelevant.reply
  529. Iunaw 21:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
  530. Wloveral (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
  531. Realismadder (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)reply
  532. - -[The Spooky One] | [t c r] 05:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)reply
  533. Joyson Noel (talk) This is a free encyclopedia and must be without any bias or prejudice. Therfore, i will never tolerate the censorship of this website by self righteous hypocrites with their own narrow minded personal agenda. 01:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)reply
  534. OwenBlacker (Talk)
  535. Chipthief00
  536. JohnnyCalifornia
  537. Anjoe (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC) - What matters is the educational value of Wikipedia. If maximal informative material offend some people —- so be it.reply
  538. Sigurd Dragon Slayer (talk) 10:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)reply
  539. haha169 (talk) 23:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)reply
  540. Mustafa Ahmed (talk)--Mustafaahmedhussien (talk) 22:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC) - Anything could be offensive to someone... Censorship means shutting down wikipedia!!!!!reply
  541. Malfacteur (Talk) 29 July 2008
  542. Forridean 29 July 2008
  543. Swampfire (talk) 00:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)reply
  544. forestPIG(grunt)
  545. Eurosceptic Libertarian (talk Say the facts as they are. Do not censor them to be politically correct. People can remain offended if the facts offend them.
  546. Rimbaud 2 ([User talk:Rimbaud 2|talk]])
  547. --Mistabeen (talk) 14:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)reply
  548. 御門桜(MIKADO, Sakura) (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)reply
  549. l'aquatique || talk 07:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC) This whole UK thing has convinced me that censorship can only end badly in a Wiki environment.reply
  550. ERK talk • contribs 08:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)reply
  551. Skyler13 (Talk) 29 December 2008
  552. Mitch3000 19:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)reply
  553. SWMNPoliSciProject (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)reply
  554. Sioraf (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)reply
  555. Juancdg 00:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)reply
  556. Chendy (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC) If there is evidence, then information should stayreply
  557. The offensive is not the untruth. Elm-39 - T/C 19:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)reply
  558. Mkevlar 02:55, 16 Febuary 2009 (UTC)
  559. Sapph42 (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
  560. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
  561. HampshireCricketFan (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply
  562. LizParker (talk) 07:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)reply
  563. K.Sørensen (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC) The government of People's Republic of China blocked a lot of articles on Wikipedia, like Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, in order to prevent something 'bad'...even searching "websites blocked china" can be censored...I'm a person who is against this kind of censorship! Do something!reply
  564. User:Millennium_Twain ([]) 11:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC) I was just threatened with blocking, because I added (referenced) sacred woman's history information and Jomon period (stone age) artwork to the Feminism_in_Japan article. I'm new here, so don't know how to tell when I am (we are) a victim of authorized administrative violence, or merely an individual editors violence. Any suggestions?reply
  565. Dendre (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC) This.reply
  566. Hokainsultin (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)reply
  567. Living under a rock (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)reply
  568. User:Politis, freedom of expression is of the essence, especially in a place like Wikipedia.
  569. tsunamishadow (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC), Political Correctness only prevents the truth. Censorship should only be used for matters of privacy.reply
  570. Zacherystaylor (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Censorship is especially bad when it prevents education about violence or Preventing School Violence Good dayreply
  571. Secret Saturdays (talk) 04:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC) I hope people will visit this website and see the work of a millions of wikipedians up close without the fear of being censored. LONG LIVE THE 1ST AMENDMENT!!reply
  572. Jiggly.cho
  573. Septagram
  574. Trickymaster (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)reply
  575. Raphaelguy 21:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC) I have no idea what to say, and that's okay here.reply
  576. SeriousKarma (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
  577. Estrelly 05:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
  578. English Bobby (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Fight the censor nuts!reply
  579. Mahmudmasri (talk) 11:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Censorship blinds!reply
  580. Maysara (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Yes!reply
  581. Kingbirdy23 (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)reply
  582. ushrark 3:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
  583. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 11:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) "A censor is a man who knows more than he thinks you ought to.” - Granville Hicksreply
  584. Omicron91 09:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC) (talk)reply
  585. --Saukkomies talk 04:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
  586. hellais 00:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)reply
  587. JP419"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man" ...and with that said, let the war on censorship begin. Visit my page and check out the subjects for which I stand vigilant. Nothing on Wikipedia should be censored, whether by deletion or fundamental rewrite. I'm an inclusionist JP419 (talk) 09:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)reply
  588. Chetan Kandari
  589. Dront (talk) 13:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)reply
  590. PositivelyJordan (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)reply
  591. Scott i am (talk) Editing articles to censor them is just stupid. 19:35, 9 Febuary 2010 (UPC)
  592. --Gulivar (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)reply
  593. O'DaveY (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
  594. Ink Falls 16:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)reply
  595. C4bl3Fl4m3 04:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
  596. User:Zonafan39 28 May 2010
  597. Shinryuu (talk) 21:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)reply
  598. Zenswashbuckler (talk) 28 June 2010
  599. Cosman246 (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)reply
  600. DamaclesBeDamned (talk) 13:40, 22 July 2010
  601. WackyWace converse | contribs 17:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
  602. Junkie007 (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)reply
  603. Nowyouseemetalk2me 06:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
  604. Yjo (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)reply
  605. Drbogdan (talk) 03:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)reply
  606. Kgasso (talk) 07:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)reply
  607. Hazzarington ,small.(talk) 18:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)reply
  608. Sandb 5 January 2011
  609. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC) (Make that 610).reply
  610. Outlaw265 (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
  611. Tbennert (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
  612. Cyclopiatalk 23:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)reply
  613. Smart30 --Smart30 (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)reply
  614. Daemorris (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)reply
  615. Stanqo (talk) 11:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)reply
  616. Scootercatter (talk) 06:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)reply
  617. Mabuska (talk) 23:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)reply
  618. --Alza08 (talk) 08:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)reply
  619. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
  620. Allens (talk)
  621. Abderrahman Najjar (talk) 21:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)reply
  622. Byrappa
  623. teksquisite --teksquisite (talk) 06:21, 17 December 2011 (UTC)reply
  624. Benjitheijneb (talk) 02:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)reply
  625. --ManSkirtDude101 (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC) Free speech for evreyone!reply
  626. Julius177 (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)reply
  627. Benjamin9832 (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)reply
  628. RubenSchade (talk) 06:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC) – I have a pro-fact bias, which doesn't permit me the luxury of removing material I may or may not otherwise condone. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia! :)reply
  629. JLevs106 (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC) Joined after reading Fahrenheit 451.reply
  630. Jenova20 10:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)reply
  631. Alxeedo TALK 23:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)reply
  632. Pereant antiburchius (talk) 12:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)reply
  633. Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 19:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)reply
  634. gtajaxoxo 13:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)reply
  635. Nightdevil (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)reply
  636. ----iSquishy (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)reply
  637. ❤ Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 15:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)reply
  638. Censorship out! SpartacksCompatriot 16:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)reply
  639. Garrettmg (talk) 23:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)reply
  640. lemsterboy (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)reply
  641. Seqqis (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC) The Internet belongs to everyone, censorship begonereply
  642. Adam9389 (talk) 12:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)reply
  643. Darwin machine (talk) 04:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)reply
  644. The Green John (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)reply
  645. Rohini (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)reply
  646. UncappingCone64 (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)reply
  647. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ (♥ Talk♥ ) Over the last few years there has been a lot of censorship of visual images of sex or bodies. People are very reluctant to discuss their prejudices about nudity, sex, and bodily functions, and label you a pervert. I myself have just been banned for 3 weeks over an image of the 1866 painting L'Origine du monde on my user page.
  648. HiLo48 (talk) 04:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)reply
  649. Radath (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
  650. Cooperstimson (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)reply
  651. XeroxKleenex (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC)reply
  652. Gregkaye (talk) 12:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)reply
  653. --Allen talk signing at 21:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC). A good idea going against censorship on Wikipedia.reply
  654. Septinlas (talk) 07:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
  655. Citation Needed | 17:44, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
  656. Joeygreen1 (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)reply
  657. Curlymanjaro (talk) 12:39, 12th October 2014 (UTC)
  658. User:Crossark (User_talk:Crossark) @2:06 A.M 2 December 2014
  659. User:Gregdox (User_talk:Gregdox) 7:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  660. User:Amanrajveer
  661. Ciridae (talk) 09:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)reply
  662. Lilactree2013 3:40, December 5, 2015 (UTC)
  663. AdamCochran 1:02, December 10, 2015 (UTC)
  664. Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  665. 6rnnn 23:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)reply
  666. jeth888(talk) 9:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  667. Editor 357 (talk) 13:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)reply
  668. Kinghumez (talk)
  669. Balag12 (talk)
  670. Warren Leywon (feel free to talk) 8:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
  671. JethRoad the FactBoy
  672. HorizontalTwo08 (talk) 6:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  673. ELH.Peace
  674. The Young Skeptic
  675. Lexlex (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)reply
  676. Ayenaee (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
  677. Htpark28 (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
  678. Gilang Syawal Ajiputra (talk) 02:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)reply
  679. Knoxo (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)reply
  680. PickleG13 (talk) 01:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
  681. Alexinov, "Censorship reflects a societies lack of confidence in itself.” - Potter Stewart
  682. Bill Huston (talk) 07:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
  683. BasedMises BasedMises(talk) 15 March 2021
  684. Celine1776 24 April 2021
  685. Momoapplegirl (talk) 13:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)reply
  686. Shellwood (talk) 22:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)reply
  687. Peatta I come from a country that is censoring information so I'm here to defend the freedom of speech
  688. lol1VNIO (talk • contribs) 10:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)reply
  689. Ps103ankit (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)reply
  690. Demt1298 (talk) 15:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)reply
  691. Awn Freihat1
  692. Thinker78 (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)reply
  693. تاورنیه (talk) 16:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
  694. Ashertheaxolotl (talk) 22:08, 6 August 2023 (UTC)reply
  695. DarklitShadow (talk) 04:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
  696. Mithrilbard (talk) 06:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
  697. Smithsonsss (talk)
  698. Claggy (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
  699. Jionunez (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)reply
  700. ARKH (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2025 (UTC)reply
  701. Bduke (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC)reply
  702. Theofunny (talk) 5:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
  703. Unknown Lifeform | Talk 23:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)reply
  704. TheCapibara (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)reply
  705. Sharkon36 (talk) 08:13, 08 July 2025 (UTC)reply
  706. User:CoreyWikiEditor (talk) 22:20, 16 July 2025 (UTC)reply
  707. Timeshifter (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC) - Wikipedia often still censors alien and UFO info. Apparently a source becomes unreliable once it starts interviewing witnesses. Otherwise reliable news organizations, and whole books with many witnesses.reply
  708. User:MarkLouiseDar (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2025 (UTC)reply
  709. Regards, Shield. \\ |T| - |C| \\ 05:02, 28 August 2025 (UTC) - Censorship is not right and should never be practised, especially with encyclopaedic information. I support this project wholeheartedly.reply
  710. NV1982 (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)reply
  711. Achintya2023 (talk) 09:17, 02 October 2025 (UTC)reply
  712. ⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2026 (UTC) Censorship in and of itself is biased. Let's see what we can do!reply
  713. UnilandofmaTalk 16:08, 15 March 2026 (UTC) — Censorship should not be used anywhere in the world.reply
  714. Embalmer 2 April 2026
  715. Dofrg (talk) 22:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)reply
  716. ActOfCongress (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)reply
  717. Rattusmischief May 22 2026
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedians_against_censorship/Members&oldid=1364960578"