Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. AI-generated imagesEntirely or substantially AI-generated images are not eligible for featured picture status. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2026 at 12:00:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
Info Not an image of outstanding beauty, but a cry of concern in light of forest damage in Germany even before the current hot and drought summer. All by me. --Milseburg (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2026 at 19:17:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
Info Blast Furnace 4 at the voestalpine integrated steel plant in Leoben-Donawitz (Styria, Austria), to be replaced by an electric arc furnace in 2027. All by me. -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2026 at 13:12:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal
Info Façade of one of the interior gardens of Hospital da Luz, Lisboa. Along the lines of some other featured pictures (such as this old one, but with a twist. A new try of this nomination, after the issues raised in the evaluation were addressed: the elliptic flare was eliminated by cloning and the overexposure of columns and beams was corrected. Some discrete lights are seen behind the glass, caused by the interior illumination.Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2026 at 10:24:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Other team sports
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2026 at 10:13:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Gardens#Germany
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment High quality photo, but the lens does make it look like a doll's houseǃǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Info I think you are right. I corrected the perspective to a more naturalistic way --Llez (talk) 17:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Thank you. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2026 at 04:58:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Japan
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu. One of the coolest-looking trains ever. The car 1 (top) physically has narrower windows than car 6, which has more expensive seats with more legroom. -- dllu (talk) 04:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 04:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for your elaborate works, Dllu. In this case I'm wondering whether it wouldn't have been better to place the camera maybe 30 cm higher so that the window in the back of the train is located inside the window in the front. Like this it looks like (I know, it isn't) 2 images on one. Poco a poco (talk) 13:28, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- That's true. I could have raised the center column of the tripod to lift the camera up higher. However, I don't have plans to revisit Osaka in the near future so I probably won't be re-attempting this. I also have File:Nankai 50000 series Rapit cars 50703 50203 Imamiyaebisu Station Osaka line scan dllu.jpg which has less perspective distortion (the train was on the farther track) and slightly sharper but I accidentally messed up and only captured the first three cars and not the whole train. dllu (talk) 21:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2026 at 04:30:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 20:56:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Blenniidae_(Combtooth_Blennies)
Info Bluestriped fangblenny (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos), Ambalihabe, Madagascar. It's found in coral reefs in the Pacific and Indian Ocean and reaches a maximal length of 12 centimetres (4.7 in). They hide in deserted worm tubes or other small holes. Bluestriped fangblenny mimic the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus) to enable them to loiter at cleaner stations and dupe clients waiting to be cleaned. They can also bite divers when alarmed. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the genus Plagiotremus that includes 11 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose WB. Too much to red. Mile (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- You and your subtle way... I've made it a bit more greenish Poco a poco (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 19:55:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Agamidae_(Dragon_Lizards)
Info created by Aboyahia74 – uploaded by Aboyahia74 – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:55, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:55, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It looks good as a thumbnail, but upon closer inspection, there are too many artifacts around the head. It's oversharpened, in my opinion.--Ermell (talk) 22:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose agree with Ermell. At full resolution, the head is not sharp. Given the shallow DOF, the composition should probably be focused on the head, but the clarity isn't present. -- E bailey (talk) 15:32, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 16:41:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
Info Work Projects Administration Poster – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 16:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 16:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Here I miss the wow factor. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 13:10:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Kazakhstan
Info Mausoleum to Koja Ahmad Yassaui, Turkistan, Kazakhstan (2013). UNESCO site. My work. -- Mile (talk) 13:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 16:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: the crouching person with partially exposed butt is rather disturbing... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hard to erase, he covers leg of other, which cover Mausolum with head. But maybe a bit overracting. Maybe i could dress him ? Mile (talk) 13:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Haha, well, that's an option. I'd just clone out the whole group, seems easier. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, i've tried doing just that, feel free to use: [1] --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Could be that too. Mile (talk) 08:29, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, i've tried doing just that, feel free to use: [1] --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Haha, well, that's an option. I'd just clone out the whole group, seems easier. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hard to erase, he covers leg of other, which cover Mausolum with head. But maybe a bit overracting. Maybe i could dress him ? Mile (talk) 13:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 11:01:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deer)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Great picture with space around and a beautiful deer. --Yann (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support welcome back --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 10:37:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Genus : Neotamias (Chipmunks)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 19:00, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Question: what are the bright spots above the head? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- bushes/vegetation - like where the deer is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I think the Cosmonaut is referring to 2 small white specks above the head. Probably dust on the chipmunk hair. Yann (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yep, those --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- yes, dust on the whiskers. Scruffy chap... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yep, those --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I think the Cosmonaut is referring to 2 small white specks above the head. Probably dust on the chipmunk hair. Yann (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- bushes/vegetation - like where the deer is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- On closer inspection, there is an area less sharp then the rest (see note). Could you have a look please? Yann (talk) 09:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- new version uploaded Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 01:07, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Is the king of chipmunk photography about to be dethroned? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment No, not for Tamias sonomae, Frankǃ But I was amazed how many beautiful squirrel species there are in WA and BC and AB, Canada. Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:12, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Support ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 14:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 10:02:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Seychelles
Info These striking fluted granite formations were sculpted from Curieuse’s roughly 750-million-year-old Precambrian bedrock by prolonged tropical chemical weathering, with salt spray, runoff and coastal erosion further accentuating their distinctive ridged shapes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 10:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 10:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Certainly a nice place, but nothing striking in the way you took the picture IMO, sorry. Composition could be better (tree on the right). And there are small CAs on the beach on the right --Benji 13:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Done CA removed. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 11:27, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 07:12:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United States
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Info It's one picture now! dllu (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. Very nice presentation and useful format -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This is an excellent solution to the issue discussed on FPC talk. Presenting the complete line scan as one coherent image, with the train shown in three sections, preserves its remarkable detail while making the full length of the train easy to appreciate. A very impressive and well-executed presentation. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good now. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you to all the users who participated in the aforementioned discussion. The current solution seems satisfactory. IamMM (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support: excellent photomontage; both very useful and aesthetically pleasing --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per George and Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 00:40, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Delightful. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2026 at 04:19:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Sea dike at Koehool. view of the mudflats and the Wadden Sea at low tide. Focus stack of 3 photos. (Rain is approaching over the mudflats and the Wadden Sea at Koehool).
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: the horizon is slightly tilted --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut:
Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut:
Oppose I fail to see what is extraordinray here. The mudflats could be a FP-worthy subject, but much close. The sea, its color, the overall compo is not appealing Poco a poco (talk) 13:33, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Answer: I'm not really supposed to say this, but I think this UNESCO World Heritage site is phenomenal.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support: for the multi-layered effect and subtle details that are not immediately apparent --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 20:04:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other seems best suited for a postcard.
Info St. Paul's Cathedral, completed in 1846, is the seat of the Diocese of Huron and the oldest church in London, Ontario, Canada. The church is still extant, but the view shown here is blocked entirely by trees these days. While browsing historical postcards during a recent trip, I saw this item and thought the mood of the winter night, the turn-of-the-century artstyle, and the detailed depiction of the church and its supporting buildings was excellent. (Even better, the post-mark on the reverse gives a very explicit publication date for copyright status).
- Created by Red Star News Co., London, Ontario – scanned, uploaded, restored, and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 19:00, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support An important historical record of the cathedral and its surroundings, preserving a view that is no longer available today. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 17:50:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Japan
Info The Soho, Tokyo. Taken by Pierre Blaché – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 19:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Great colors. Yann (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Very striking. However, Template:FoP-Japan should be used as the building seems to be new enough to still be in copyright. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:08, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support A truly striking image with amazing colors and a strong visual impact. Imho, it is a great find and worth a careful technical refinement. I have prepared a slightly improved version as a suggestion. I adjusted the image at 100% view to reduce visible noise, refine sharpness, and minimize the slight blur on the left side. If you think this version could be useful for the nomination, you are very welcome to download it here via SwissTransfer and upload it as a new version. Of course, please use it only if you consider it an improvement :) -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Obviously better. I've used it. Thanks
! Юрий Д.К. 20:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Obviously better. I've used it. Thanks
Support Excellent colors, lighting and composition. Acroterion (talk) 02:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:11, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 09:42, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:04, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 01:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 15:34, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 17:50:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
Info Hungarian Parliament Building at blue hour. Taken by Pierre Blaché – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 19:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support: wow indeed! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Prachtig --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 09:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Benji 13:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 01:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 17:40:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rakibulalamkhanbd – uploaded by Rakibulalamkhanbd – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 17:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 17:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment A great idea and well composed, but the upper levels are lost in the darkness and are important - is there any way to recover some of that detail? Acroterion (talk) 02:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 08:59:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support не ли е за WLM во септември ? Mile (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)--
- Веќе ми беше подигната. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:07, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I like it, but could be sharper --Llez (talk) 09:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Llez: Thank you for your review. I've uploaded a sharper version. How does it look now? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice! --B. Jankuloski (talk) 19:12, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 08:07:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 08:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Yet another wonderful Mandelbrot set image. But honestly, the Mandelbrot set is infinite but self-similar, and I don't want to see infinitely more images of it. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose -- I agree with Uoaei1; that's exactly right. Je-str (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Agree, we have gazillon of them. They are nice anyway. Mile (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)--
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:15, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per above, we may have reached the saturation point...Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Uoaei1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 07:54:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info One of the deepest images of the Small Magellanic Cloud, with the foreground globular cluster 47 Tucanae at the upper right. Created by CTIO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/SMASH (Survey of the MAgellanic Stellar History) /D. Nidever (Montana State University) using the 4 meter Víctor M. Blanco Telescope – processed by Travis Rector (University of Alaska Anchorage), Mahdi Zamani & Davide de Martin – uploaded by Fabian RRRR – nominated by me —brainandforce [yap] 07:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Currently no FPs of the Milky Way's second biggest satellite galaxy! —brainandforce [yap] 07:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but the nomination should be updated, the JPG version has been uploaded by @Fabian RRRR: , not by my bot. vip (talk) 08:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support and nom. updated. Yann (talk) 09:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 21:50:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Crocodylidae_(Crocodiles)
Info all by me – -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:50, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Dwarf crocodile (Osteolaemus tetraspis) in the terrarium building of Wuppertal Zoo, Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany; photographic technique: focus stacking, hand-held
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:50, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose - While I appreciate the difficulty of shooting handheld in an indoor setting, the OOF ridges on the far side of the head are distracting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Chris Woodrich. And I don't think in fact that the difficulty in a zoo (indoor) is even close to the same shot of animals like this in their natural habitat. Poco a poco (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Poco a poco, we are here on Featured pictures and not on Featured safari/wildlife pictures. I completely agree that such s photo is much more difficult in wildlife - and I can only imagine how much effort you spend to get such high quality wildlife photos you do. But during the assessment we should stick to the photo itself. Not everyone has the personal circumstances to travel around the world and make cool safari shots. I really admit your photos from all around the world but I also like good zoo shots I usually do - 5th place on PoY 2025 was a zoo shot only a few kilometers from my home base :) --Tuxyso (talk) 21:37, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Chris Woodrich for the review and observation - IMHO I cannot fix it in post but I think the overal quality plus the reflection is still quite good. Tuxyso (talk) 21:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 21:27:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Guardian Angel chapel (baptismal chapel) of St. Lorenz Basilica in Kempten (Allgäu), Bavaria: baptismal font with a figure of John the Baptist, behind it the Guardian Angel altar with an oval altarpiece (a guardian angel guiding a child towards the personification of Faith) and the Eye of Providence above, flanked by the epitaphs of prince-abbots Rupert von Bodman (d. 1728, left) and Engelbert von Syrgenstein (d. 1760, right)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:13, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment - Very nice, and I'd like to support, but there is a slight horizontal lean. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review. Please take another look, Chris Woodrich. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know if it's a cache issue, but I'm not seeing a difference. I'll try revising on a different computer. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- There seem to be an cache issue. I see an older photo from a mountain (wrong upload) not the current photo. Strange... --Tuxyso (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm getting the mountain on my work computer, which has never opened this file before. I am finding that Commons isn't showing updates as quickly as it used to, but I don't know if that's just me or if there is actually a technical issue.
Support In the interim. It was a slight tilt, and the thumbnail at least looks straighter. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- There seem to be an cache issue. I see an older photo from a mountain (wrong upload) not the current photo. Strange... --Tuxyso (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know if it's a cache issue, but I'm not seeing a difference. I'll try revising on a different computer. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 19:52:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Corvidae#Genus_:_Corvus
Info Just a portrait of a friendly common raven (Corvus corax). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice bokeh and sharpness! Could you adjust the exposure down a bit? It seems slightly overexposed to me, and I think the empty space on the left doesn't make for too good of a crop. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think I'll wait for a few more opinions to come in before attempting a change. I played with crops and tone settings before settling on this one so would prefer to see how it plays out for a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:14, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: excellent portrait, but I agree about exposure, especially on the beak, any way to dial it down? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but, yes, overexposed a bit Юрий Д.К. 18:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support, and agree about dialing down the exposure a smidge. Crop is fine, though I'm curious whether a 3x4 or 8x11 portrait crop would improve the composition (no idea how much space outside the crop your RAW has). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment New version uploaded. @Aciarium and The Cosmonaut: I've dialed them down a little bit and taken a little bit off the left side. Thoughts? Not all of the highlights were recoverable, unfortunately, but I don't think it's too bad. YMMV. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:29, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: Thank you, the crop is much better now. But especially the beak is still overexposed. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Much better now. Thank you for the improvement! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:49, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 19:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Wyoming
Info Dead tree trunk near the Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone. The spring itself is spectacular, of course (we have a couple FPs of it, I think), but my attention kept landing on these stark dead trees extending from the nearby ground of siliceous sinter (and the various microbes that color it). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- I'm very familiar with the area, and it's good to see a picture from Grand Prismatic Spring that shows another aspect of the feature. Acroterion (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. Nice --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 09:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Original and striking compo / subject --Benji 13:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 18:15:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
Info All by me. Stitched panorama, 22 400 × 7 467 px (167 MP). There is one FP of a related view, MontBlanc2c.jpg (2007, 18 MP), but the framing is different. I am not proposing a replacement. The two are complementary, and the 19-year gap also allows a comparison of the glaciers. -- Espandero (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Espandero (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment I was about to mention MontBlanc2c.jpg (It was taken by my friend and I was next to him, taking some much less impressive photos. Brings back memories!). This has a more fortunate lighting and clouds add some mystic. But it lacks room around the subject IMO. On closer inspection, I also notice Adobe still hasn't figured out processing Fuji's x-trans' RAW. You should give Iridient (or something else) a chance :) - Benh (talk) 18:35, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Per Benh. This is on the right track for becoming a FP, but needs more space to breathe! Also seems a but dull to me in regards of highlights/shadows. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:08, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Benh and Aciarium: on this specific file I have a little wiggle room of a few 100 pixels at the top, but I'm not sure it would really add to the picture. I also have the same photo taken with my 18mm but then it's not as detailed because it is not a panorama. In a way I feel the cloud left to the top makes it look tighter than it really is. I could upload a new version if you want. Espandero (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Yes, the crop is a bit tight, but the wealth of detail due to the high resolution is superior and is overwhelming me. --Milseburg (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Back in the day, the Mont Blanc du Tacul was an easy ascent, but as we can see here, it has become much more tricky. Yann (talk) 09:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the tight crop, epecially at the top, doesn't make justice to this awesome subject. Please check the white balance, which seems a bit displaced to the blue-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Benh, Aciarium and Alvesgaspar: I've uploaded a new version, using all the space I've got to the top. Once again I don't think the top is that tightly cropped, but the cloud gives that impression. --Espandero (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Espandero: Compared to the original version the image doesn't feel as cramped anymore. But it still doesn't convince me due to the contrast being rather dull (and also per Alves and the Cosmonaut). --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support, but I also feel the white balance should be a bit warmer. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral The crop is too tight at the top, it could be more balanced. I'm not opposing for the great view and detail Poco a poco (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 19:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 15:37, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 15:56:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: Zingaro coast; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but there is a halo on the left side of the left house.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:08, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I was going to support because of the nice compo but the detail is not convincing Poco a poco (talk) 07:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 15:02:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created and uploaded by Zysko serhii – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 15:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support An extremely saline lake, very interesting --Wilfredor (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice scene and good execution. This geometric, planar approach makes it look almost unnaturally minimalistic. I like it. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The slight ripples keep it from being too much of a tonal gradient, well done. Acroterion (talk) 03:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Minimalism at its finest. Controlled exposure, seamless color gradients, and a composition that quietly invites contemplation. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per anderen. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Je-str (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but there is a slight cw tilt Poco a poco (talk) 07:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 19:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but tilted, should be solved. Poco is right. Mile (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This image reminds me of the flag of my home Brazilian state Espírito Santo. ★ 16:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 14:56:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
Info created and uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:03, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Question This is an impressive picture, comparable to the ones made by our best macro photographers. But this result cannot be obtained with a single shot. If focus stacking was used, that should be mentioned in the image file. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Some regular FPC contributors do not always provide detailed documentation for their images, and questions about the techniques used may therefore remain unanswered. Since the photographer was not the person who nominated the image, they may not see this discussion, but one possible explanation is that several photographs were combined using an image-stacking technique. Whatever the method, the final result is impressive and would certainly be interesting to learn more about Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- First of all,
Strong support. Very good composition, pleasant colors, and – to state the obvious – incredible resolution. In this particular case, I don't think the missing retouched-picture tag is that big of an issue, since there are is no apparent reason not to assume good faith. Alvesgaspar and Wilfredor made me realize that maybe it would be a good idea to reconsider if and how such "etiquette" rules should be enforced in the future. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:40, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ever in QIC and also in FPC, contributors are generally encouraged to provide at least a proper English description, together with useful information such as geolocation, a panorama designation when applicable, complete EXIF data, the often-overlooked P180 statement, and appropriate categorization, italicized name on specimens, etc... Although many of these expectations are not formally written rules, they have gradually become established community practices over time. They help reviewers understand how an image was produced and properly document it, but they can also be confusing and burdensome for newcomers who may not yet be familiar with these unwritten conventions. More recently, however, a formal requirement was approved, the description must clearly state whether artificial intelligence was used, either partially or entirely, in creating the image. Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- First of all,
- Some regular FPC contributors do not always provide detailed documentation for their images, and questions about the techniques used may therefore remain unanswered. Since the photographer was not the person who nominated the image, they may not see this discussion, but one possible explanation is that several photographs were combined using an image-stacking technique. Whatever the method, the final result is impressive and would certainly be interesting to learn more about Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Je-str (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support But agree, more information should be provided. Is the insect alive? Poco a poco (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I’m not the photographer, but I believe it is alive. I just read about a technique that uses focus stacking without needing a tripod; instead, the photographer moves millimeters closer to the subject while shooting a 6 fps burst, which can be enough to produce ultra-sharp images. Wilfredor (talk) 03:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think it can be done with a shutter speed of 1/20 s and a hand-held camera. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I’m not the photographer, but I believe it is alive. I just read about a technique that uses focus stacking without needing a tripod; instead, the photographer moves millimeters closer to the subject while shooting a 6 fps burst, which can be enough to produce ultra-sharp images. Wilfredor (talk) 03:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 14:52:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Indonesia
Info created and uploaded by Crisco 1492 – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support very well composed and unusual view of the temple. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as creator and per nom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support But perhaps you should have photographed the flowers in front of the object separately and then stacked them; the flowers would have been much sharper then.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- This is from my very early experience with DSLRs (13 months after I bought the camera) and I had not reached that point. Good idea for future efforts, though! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 12:55:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Ukraine#Zakarpattia Oblast
Info Carpathian Biosphere Reserve; Rakhiv, Tiachiv, Khust, and Vynohradiv districts. July 2016. Created by Estolyarov – uploaded by Estolyarov – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Beautifully captured. Ukraine is an amazing country in many respects. -- IamMM (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Beautiful scenery, and well balanced.--Paracel63 (talk) 06:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Super! Юрий Д.К. 18:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Although I'd crop indeed a chunk of the meadow Poco a poco (talk) 07:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Sat, 15 Aug 2026 11:34:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. Great composition, this image has a rhythm like music! -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)The white parts are still quite noisy and a bit overexposed. A very good photo nevertheless.-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral - I applied noise reduction and a slight brightness correction. Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful Юрий Д.К. 18:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Good work on the tonal balance, especially after the noise reduction and brightness correction. The bright whites and yellows are now well controlled while retaining rich detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Much better now even if the upper part of the ceiling looks unsharp and undetailed. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:27, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 10:02:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created and uploaded by Yacoup almahdi – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark. Why PNG? Yann (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann Thank you for your review. It may be a little dark, but I think the horse details are still clearly visible. As for the PNG format, I'm not sure why the image was uploaded that way, since I'm not the photographer. I simply liked the picture and nominated it for Featured Picture. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:20, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I love these coffee tones and there's great detail even in the shadows. -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Hard to distinguish. Underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Per George Chernilevsky --Llez (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 04:21:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Switzerland
Info Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. The weather wasn't on our side, but even against the dark clouds it's an impressive castle for me.
-- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2026 at 19:57:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Chaetodontidae (Butterflyfishes)
Info Scrawled butterflyfish (Chaetodon meyeri), Nosy Kalakajoro, Madagascar. This species of butterflyfish is found at depths between 2–25 metres (6.6–82.0 ft) in the Indian and Pacific Oceans where it inhabits area rich in coral in clear lagoons and seaward reefs. It attains a maximum total length of 20 centimetres (7.9 in). Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons yet. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 23:59, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2026 at 12:38:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
Info Right brake light of the BMW Vision Efficient Dynamics. Created and uploaded by A,Ocram – nominated by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as nominator. IMO an excellent example of a close-up shot of a automobile. -- MB-one (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 15:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Useful image for the repository but not a FP in my view: busy background, harsh light, questionable composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Didn't realize it was a car at first -- successfully abstracted colorful, sleek shapes IMO. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)- BMW was truly ahead of its time with the i8 (and its preceding concept). Sadly, we don't see this design philosophy in today's production cars anymore: pleasant, futuristic, and immediately recognizable! Also, sadly, I need to give this a
Weak oppose; the composition isn't convincing to me and I think a lower angle would have been better. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- A good abstraction of an object that would be just another depiction if more had been shown. Acroterion (talk) 23:41, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Acroterion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per Rhododendrites. —brainandforce [yap] 07:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's a good thing you tried an original composition for a (part of a) car, but I don't think this one is working, per Aciarium, sorry --Benji 13:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 21:18:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Portugal#Faro
Info: Das Poças beachlet; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Detail here is fine but I don't find this beach appealing, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 19:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 12:43:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Meals (food and drink)
Info Vigan Empanada is a very famous merienda food in the Ilocos Region (the Philippines). It's made of vegetables like papaya or cabbage, and also meat and egg. Created by Jessartcam – uploaded by Jessartcam – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: just a comment now, I'm not ready to vote yet. It looks very nice at first glance. However, there are at least two light sources: one on the top right and one on the top left. And one more to illuminate the crisscrossed pepper pods. The smoke or steam looks artificial. A lit incense stick was likely used to create so strong smoky effect. The initial wow factor is lost due to the obvious fakeness. -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Doubtless artificially lit, but nonetheless beautiful and attractive to me Cmao20 (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I think with something like food photography, I assume the setting to be heavily staged, and what matters to me is the final result. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:52, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Composition, colors, and details. The staging does not reduce the visual impact or cultural value. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Restaurants plate, photographers stage; it's the way of life with food presentation. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Quality food photography is just about always staged, and there's no prohibition against composed lighting at FP. Acroterion (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support The kind of picture you would find in a high-class cookbook (although I sometimes miss those early-2000s "Wikipedia food" photos)! Lighting isn't an issue to me, although the smoke is maybe a bit over the top. But the food itself looks natural and the picture succeeds at giving the viewer a very clear understanding of the dish. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 00:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Food photography is one of my favorite hobbies, both because I enjoy the creative process of taking the photo and because it gives me the opportunity to discover and experience unusual dishes. This image looks very appetizing, especially with its spicy character, which I particularly enjoy....mmmm. That said, and sorry for being a party pooper, the composition feels somewhat tight and confined. The limited space and cropped elements make the image appear slightly cluttered. Allowing more room around the dish and using a higher depth of field could create a more balanced. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I want an empanada now... —brainandforce [yap] 07:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Nice but too much vignetting Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 06:21:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Monticola
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose technically very good. But the dull fore- and background kills every "wow" for me. Sorry. --MB-one (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:17, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:27:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Pyrénées
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2026 (UTC)- Wouldn't it be good to crop or clone that blurry object in the bottom
leftright corner? But regardless,
Support. Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support But per Cmao20 (I think he meant the bottom right corner) --Llez (talk) 17:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I did, yes, sorry about that. Cmao20 (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:58, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:24:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Despite the grey sky, nice colors and good composition. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Not as high resolution as the existing FP, but a wider view and very different light. Both can be featured IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose An impressibe building and a well composed photo. But light is not the best, resulting in dull colours and small contrast. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Cmao20 -- IamMM (talk) 15:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I've to agree with Alvesgaspar Poco a poco (talk) 13:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Very good and efficient as usual, but the light is dull. I'm very sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Great architecture, but non-cooperative cloudy sky, and unappealing light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Dull light. Unfortunate conditions. --Milseburg (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:56, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:10:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species : Vulpes vulpes (Red Foxes)
Info Wild red fox in Island Beach State Park, US. Created by Flickr user Anthony Quintano – uploaded by Tm – nominated by LetmeEditit -- LetmeEditit (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LetmeEditit (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - I'd have preferred a bit looser of a crop, but still very nice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Very cute and overall good but I'm not fully convinced this is FP when a lot of it, including the eyes and nose, are not in focus. I also suspect the white balance is too warm. Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp, too tight crop, white balance probably off. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Cute but problem of DoF, and tight crop -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Nice, but technical issues Юрий Д.К. 17:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment
White balance --Wilfredor (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:41:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:39:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 01:54:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
Info created and uploaded by J.Abisolon – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support, though I think Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo_techniques/Black_and_White#Objects would be a better target gallery. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment +1, I agree with Chris. I took the liberty of changing the gallery link to the one he suggested. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I don't see the reason for black and white here, and the shallow depth of field plus visible blurry spot on the lens mean this isn't FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I like it, and appreciate the B&W choice, though I do think the DOF is unfortunate -- I want hat detail! :) — Rhododendrites talk | 18:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 02:04:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Association football (soccer)
Info created and uploaded by Berlination – nominated by ★ -- ★ 02:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 02:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 06:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment I think this photo is superior without any doubt, but I also think that images like File:Spain team celebrating Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-337.jpg, File:Dani Olmo Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-346.jpg, File:Alex Grimaldo Spain team Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-351.jpg show more emotion (maybe more "wow"), while your nomination is more documenting the celebration as whole. Any way, I think one of these images will be promoted :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Btw, I was about to nominate of these images either :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Very good, but I believe the arm on the left should be cropped out --Benji 16:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment A pity that the president is not shown on this photo. Was he cloned off?... :)) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Visibly tilted and has half a guy's arm on the left hand side (with clear red colour fringing too). Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Cmao20 --Sandro Halank (talk) 10:28, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Alternative added as suggested by PantheraLeo1359531. ★ 20:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The composition is too tight; besides, Trump is missing. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Wilfredor about the composition, sorry Cmao20 (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This guys made me happy, how couldn't I support this exceptional capture? :) And now more objectively, Trump hasn't been cloned out there, I believe that from this angle he's just on the right (see shoe tip) and therefore the tighter crop, but overall a great moment and great to have a free license shot of this moment. Poco a poco (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 05 Aug → Mon 10 Aug Thu 06 Aug → Tue 11 Aug Fri 07 Aug → Wed 12 Aug Sat 08 Aug → Thu 13 Aug Sun 09 Aug → Fri 14 Aug Mon 10 Aug → Sat 15 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 01 Aug → Mon 10 Aug Sun 02 Aug → Tue 11 Aug Mon 03 Aug → Wed 12 Aug Tue 04 Aug → Thu 13 Aug Wed 05 Aug → Fri 14 Aug Thu 06 Aug → Sat 15 Aug Fri 07 Aug → Sun 16 Aug Sat 08 Aug → Mon 17 Aug Sun 09 Aug → Tue 18 Aug Mon 10 Aug → Wed 19 Aug
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:August 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
