User talk:Callanecc
Add topic
 | Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries. |  |
| This is Callanecc's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 32 days  |
 | If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter please read User:Callanecc/Emailnotice before emailing me. |
 |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages is appreciated. |
Regarding topic ban of a user
[edit]Hi, it is regarding this edit by this user. Aren't they topic-banned from " South Asian social groups explicitly including castes". The edit they made is related to caste/community/ancestry not to mention unsourced. Please have a look. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:54, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Henry Earl
[edit]Hi Callanecc! hope you are doing well. I believe that Henry Earl, which you salted after a 2014 DRV, is now eligible for an article. During the AFD, the main argument for deletion was that an article about a man famous for being arrested over 1,000 times was an inherent BLP violation. Earl died in May 2024, so BLP is no longer an applicable argument. I also believe we have a clear GNG pass:
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Per WP:NEWSWEEK, there is consensus that pre-2013 Newsweek articles are generally reliable. This one was published in 2004. |
Multiple paragraphs about Earl |
✔ Yes | |
|
CNN is considered generally reliable |
Multiple paragraphs about Earl |
✔ Yes | |
|
Lexington Herald-Leader is a highly-regarded newspaper of record for Lexington, Kentucky. |
Multiple paragraphs about Earl |
✔ Yes | |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
Are you willing to undelete the article? I fully understand if you'd rather this be discussed at DRV given the lengthy history. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:57, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @HouseBlaster, sounds good to me so I've unsalted it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:39, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Important
[edit]REVDEL needed. New users. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 06:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Enćenćecasïdća I need some more information. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:24, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- All the names are still visible. Wondering if REVDEL is needed. Sorry to keep bothering you. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 06:41, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Bernard Barton
[edit]https://rip.ie/death-notice/bernard-barton-dublin-dun-laoghaire-638489 Citation and correction for page to be switched back to date of death as 6th Aug as I previously stated. Thank you for your assistance. ~2026-43861-44 (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've added it to the article. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:45, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Zanana
[edit]Hi , could you remove my edits , i was wrong/misled about the info.Thankz Clanon (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:01, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
Scientology-related protections
[edit]About a decade ago you protected a number of Scientology-related pages, citing Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Scientology#Editors instructed. You can find (a subset of?) them if you search for the arbitration remedy on User:Rusalkii/Candidates for unprotection. Would you be willing to lift those protections given that the remedy has recently been rescinded and most of those pages did not have a long protection history beforehand that would justify indef protection? Rusalkii (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
