Conducting Performance Reviews

He was the quiet backbone of the team. On paper? Just “meets expectations.” In reality? Irreplaceable. Recently, I watched a manager freeze when her top performer handed in his notice. It wasn’t just because he was leaving - he had plenty of options. It was because, on paper, he was rated “meets expectations.” That label hid everything that made him essential: the quiet coaching he gave new hires, the long nights keeping a failing project alive, the trust he’d built with customers no one else could calm. All “meets expectations.” And so, when he left, it caught her, and everyone flat-footed. Here’s the truth: Someone six months into a role? Meets expectations. Someone navigating a messy, high-stakes project? Meets expectations. Someone growing faster than their job description can keep up? Still…meets expectations. The way we measure performance makes a bell curve whether we intend it or not. And once people land in the middle, it’s hard to see what makes them matter. That’s why I’ve come to appreciate a question I first heard from Netflix - a question I wish every manager asked before it was too late: “If this person gave notice tomorrow, how hard would you fight to keep them?” It’s the kind of question that slices through the polite language of performance management. It forces you to name who you rely on, who you trust, who you believe in. It exposes the gap between what’s written in a calibration spreadsheet and what you feel in your gut. It sparks the conversations we should be having all along: Not, “did they tick all the boxes?” But, “do we really know what they’re worth, and are we treating them accordingly?” When you ask this question, you start seeing your team differently. Even more importantly, they might finally feel seen. So before your next performance review cycle, I challenge you: Don’t wait until someone’s walking out the door to figure out how much you value them. Have the conversation now. Do the stay interview now. Give the feedback now. Because people don’t leave companies where they feel recognized, invested in, and believed. They leave when they feel invisible behind a label like “meets expectations.” And frankly, we need to start asking ourselves... is the once-a-year performance review even useful anymore? (But ah, that’s a conversation for another post!) For now, at least consider these three take-aways: Stop treating “meets expectations” as the ultimate truth. It’s just a snapshot, not the full story. Stay interviews are more powerful than exit interviews. Don’t wait until goodbye to find out what matters. Performance management should be a mirror AND a flashlight. A mirror to reflect reality - and a flashlight to show the path ahead. Ask the question. Make it part of how you lead. And build the kind of company where your best people don’t just stay. They grow, they inspire, and they never wonder if they’re seen.

When I first asked my team for feedback, the room went SILENT. Why? Because speaking the truth felt too risky. This isn’t just my story, it’s the reality in countless workplaces. Here’s the truth: feedback is a minefield. 🔴 Done wrong? It breeds tension and mistrust. 🟢 Done right? It fixes problems—it transforms teams. Here’s how to get it right: 1/ Timing Is Everything ↳ Feedback during chaos? Disaster. Wait for a calm moment. ↳ A private 1-on-1 works best. 💡 Pro Tip: Start with a positive comment—it sets the tone. 2/ Lead With Solutions ↳ Complaints without fixes = noise. Solutions = action. ↳ Try this: “We could avoid confusion with more clarity upfront. What do you think?” 💡 Pro Tip: Frame solutions as support for the team’s success, not criticism. 3/ Be Clear, Not Cryptic ↳ Instead of “Communication could be better,” say: ↳ “Inconsistent updates slow me down. Weekly check-ins might help.” 💡 Pro Tip: Use examples to back it up—clarity builds trust. 4/ Use “I” Instead of “You” ↳ Feedback isn’t a blame game. Stick to “I” statements to share your perspective. ↳ Example: “I feel I don’t have enough autonomy to contribute fully.” 💡 Pro Tip: Highlight how solving the issue benefits the whole team. 5/ Know When to Let It Go ↳ Pick your battles. Save your energy for what really matters. ↳ Does this impact the team or my work? If not, let it go. 💡 Pro Tip: Focus feedback on what aligns with team goals. 6/ End With a Vision ↳ Great feedback doesn’t just fix problems—it builds something better. ↳ Paint the big picture: “Here’s how this change could help the team hit the next level.” 💡 Pro Tip: Vision-driven feedback inspires action. The takeaway? Feedback isn’t about proving you’re right, it’s about progress. Master these steps, and you’ll not only solve problems, but you’ll also earn respect and trust. What’s your biggest feedback fail (or win)? Share it below. 👇 ♻️ Repost to help your network get better! ➕ And follow Shulin Lee for more.

Typical career conversations are well-prepared and completely backward. The manager shows up with performance data, development goals, and a plan. The employee shows up wondering if anyone notices they stopped caring six months ago. The conversation happens, a document gets filed, but nothing changes. The gap is not an effort but a sequence. Managers jump to goals before they know whether the person in front of them is energized, growing, seen, or connected to the work. You cannot build a plan that sticks on top of a foundation you have not checked. Véronique Subileau runs HR for 10,000 people at UGI Corporation. Before any career conversation, she asks four questions. Not about goals. Not about gaps. About the person. A long pause before "are you having fun" tells her more than any performance review. An honest "no" to "do you feel recognized" points to a problem that no development plan will fix. These questions take ten minutes. They change what the next fifty minutes are actually about. She calls it touching the heart before speaking about the result. The managers who do this consistently know things about their teams that the ones who skip straight to the agenda never find out.

Managers often resist performance appraisals—not just because they’re uncomfortable, but because deep down, they feel uneasy about passing judgment on another person’s worth. This insight, drawn from a 1972 Harvard Business Review article, remains just as relevant today. Douglas McGregor argued that traditional performance evaluations put too much power in the hands of managers while treating employees as passive subjects rather than active participants in their own growth. Instead, he advocated for a shift: let employees set their own performance goals, reflect on their progress, and work collaboratively with their manager to course-correct. This approach was groundbreaking then, and it still challenges the way many organizations operate. Despite decades of leadership development, many companies continue to rely on top-down, judgment-heavy appraisals rather than empowering employees to take ownership of their growth. The world looks different today—more remote work, shifting employee expectations, and a stronger focus on autonomy—but the core truth remains: people perform better when they have agency over their own development. Three takeaways for leaders today: (1) Turn Appraisals into Coaching Conversations Instead of judging past performance, help employees define clear, meaningful goals and guide them forward. (2) Shift from Evaluation to Self-Reflection Encourage employees to assess their own progress first. They often hold themselves to a higher standard than managers do. (3) Recognize That People Aren’t Products Performance reviews aren’t about "quality control." Employees aren’t widgets on an assembly line—they are individuals with evolving skills, aspirations, and challenges. McGregor’s ideas may have been ahead of their time, but they still hold a mirror up to how we manage talent today. If leaders want engaged, high-performing teams, they need to stop controlling and start empowering. How do you approach performance conversations in your organization? #performance #collaboration #coaching #teams #leadership #learning #growth #reflection #management #managers #conversations https://lnkd.in/e_tk9_DB

Performance conversations should ignite growth, not anxiety. “When people are financially invested, they want a return. When people are emotionally invested, they want to contribute.” – Simon Sinek This thought connects deeply when we talk about performance conversations. For years, performance reviews have been framed as verdicts that is evaluative, transactional, and often induces anxiety & stress. But in today’s hybrid and agile workplaces, where collaboration and adaptability define success; we also need to rethink about how we approach them – starting from ground level. ▪️ What if we shift from evaluation method to a developmental method? ▪️ Simply, from “How did you perform?” to “How can we help you grow?” Doesn’t it already sound effective and impressive? Well, great leaders like Peter Drucker reminded me, “The best way to predict the future is to create it.” Performance conversations, when reimagined, can become exactly that where platforms are to shape the future by investing in people’s potential. In practice, this means: ➡️ Frequent check-ins that replace the one-off annual review. ➡️ Coaching-style dialogues that highlight strengths while guiding growth. ➡️ Clarity with flexibility, recognizing the fluidity of goals in dynamic environments. ➡️ Safe spaces for feedback, where trust fuels progress. The true measure of performance is not just output, but the growth journey behind it. If we, as the leaders, can turn these conversations into catalysts for inspiration, employees won’t just perform — they will thrive. Turlough Gorman Arnabi Marjit Ashutosh Kotwal Sanjay Mishra Bahar Shaikh

If your feedback isn't changing behavior, you're not giving feedback—you're just complaining. After 25 years of coaching leaders through difficult conversations, I've learned that most feedback fails because it focuses on making the giver feel better rather than making the receiver better. Why most feedback doesn't work: ↳ It's delivered months after the fact ↳ It attacks personality instead of addressing behavior ↳ It assumes the person knows what to do differently ↳ It's given when emotions are high ↳ It lacks specific examples or clear direction The feedback framework that actually changes behavior: TIMING: Soon, not eventually. Give feedback within 48 hours when possible Don't save it all for annual reviews. Address issues while they're still relevant. INTENT: Lead with purpose and use statements like - "I'm sharing this because I want to see you succeed" or "This feedback comes from a place of support." Make your positive intent explicit. STRUCTURE: Use the SBI Model. ↳Situation: When and where it happened ↳Behavior: What you observed (facts, not interpretations) ↳Impact: The effect on results, relationships, or culture COLLABORATION: Solve together by using statements such as - ↳"What's your perspective on this?" ↳"What would help you succeed in this area?" ↳"How can I better support you moving forward?" Great feedback is a gift that keeps giving. When people trust your feedback, they seek it out. When they implement it successfully, they become advocates for your leadership. Your feedback skills significantly impact your leadership effectiveness. Coaching can help; let's chat. | Joshua Miller What's the best feedback tip/advice, and what made it effective? #executivecoaching #communication #leadership #performance

Exposing managers to executive reviews early on is essential for developing a deep understanding of senior leadership perspectives on strategy, tactical decision-making, financial frameworks, and broader corporate goals. Here’s why: Typically, QBRs (Quarterly Business Reviews), MBRs (Monthly Business Reviews), and strategic calls are attended primarily by the MD/GM from a GCC perspective. This approach centralizes the responsibility of cascading insights down the chain, with the MD/GM selecting what information to share. However, inviting second and third-line managers to these reviews on a rotational basis can build a more informed and strategically aligned managerial team. This exposure enhances their comprehension of both global and local priorities, fostering leaders who are capable of executing the organization’s strategy with a well-rounded perspective. This approach is equally beneficial when applied to partners and vendors. To truly leverage these relationships, they must be brought into the broader objectives, aligning their contributions to shared goals rather than treating them as one-way transactions. By involving them in relevant strategic conversations, we can build stronger, mutually beneficial partnerships that drive greater value for all parties involved. #LeadershipDevelopment, #ManagerTraining, #StrategicAlignment, #ExecutiveReview, #BusinessStrategy, #GlobalBusiness, #GCCLeadership, #CorporateCulture, #CrossFunctionalCollaboration, #PartnerEngagement, #VendorRelationships, #TeamDevelopment, #OperationalExcellence, #InclusiveLeadership, #BusinessGrowth

People want their manager to help them get better. They want feedback that’s specific, actionable, and given with care. When leaders rush through performance reviews or treat them as administrative checkboxes, it’s not neutral. It’s damaging. It signals that their growth doesn’t really matter. Take Jennifer, for example. A year into her new role, she was called into a 15-minute performance review that wasn’t even on the calendar. Her manager, too busy to prepare, gave her a 3 out of 5 across every category because “no one under a year gets more than that.” She had worked hard, exceeded expectations, and liked her manager. But that review, her one chance to hear how she could keep growing, felt like an afterthought. If you remember nothing from today, remember, a rushed, check-the-box performance review doesn’t just demotivate. It signals indifference. And indifference kills engagement faster than criticism ever could. Do you agree? #performancereview #leadership #coaching #management

Delivering constructive feedback is part of leadership. The goal isn’t to avoid these conversations, but to approach them with the mindset of driving results and encouraging behavior change. The challenge is that feedback often means delivering a message you know the other person may resist. That’s why it’s not just about what you say, but how you say it, because if the person becomes defensive, the message won’t land. In my experience leading teams, this is how leaders can have conversations that drive results while still making their people feel supported and motivated: 1️⃣Put yourself in their shoes. If your performance was holding you back, you’d want to know. But you’d also want to be told in a way that respected your effort and potential. That’s the perspective leaders need to take. 2️⃣Start with appreciation. Anchor the conversation in value. Recognize what the person is doing well, then connect feedback to how they can have an even greater impact. This shows you’re investing in them, not criticizing them. 3️⃣Frame your words carefully. Framing makes all the difference. If you accuse, people defend. If you share perceptions—“This is how it’s being received”—you open space for dialogue. That’s when people feel safe to explain their intent and work with you on solutions. The real goal is for them to know you’re on their side. You’re having the conversation because you see their value and want to help them be their best. When leaders approach difficult conversations with the intent to support, invest, and help their people grow, those conversations stop being difficult. They become constructive. 📌How do you approach constructive feedback?

Giving hard feedback is a challenge I've faced many times as a leader. One particular instance that stands out involved a team member I respected deeply but who had recently begun missing key deadlines. I knew I had to address it, yet I wanted to do so in a way that preserved their motivation and confidence. This experience taught me the importance of careful preparation and a thoughtful approach when delivering tough feedback. First, I make sure I'm clear about the specific feedback I want to provide. Second, I understand that hard feedback should always be delivered in private, and both the recipient and I should be in a calm and receptive state of mind. When sharing feedback, I focus on specific incidents and use "I" statements to describe my observations. For example, I might say, “I noticed you handling this situation differently than usual. I'd like to discuss how we can approach it more effectively.” I also emphasize the importance of this feedback for the person's growth and development. We all need feedback to grow. Without it, organizations can develop unhealthy habits, such as avoiding conflict or only giving positive feedback. This can lead to unresolved issues that damage morale and hinder professional development. 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤: ➝ 𝐔𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫-𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐞: Start with specific examples, share your feelings, explain the consequences, and state your expectations. ➝ 𝐅𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐫, 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐫: Separate the individual from their actions to avoid defensiveness. ➝ 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚 𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: Conduct feedback conversations in private and ensure confidentiality. ➝ 𝐁𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐠𝐞: Maintain a calm tone and avoid judgmental language. It’s also important to remember that hard feedback doesn’t have to be all negative. I always try to highlight the positive aspects of the person’s work while addressing areas for improvement. My goal is to deliver the feedback in a way that is constructive and encourages growth. What about you? How do you handle delivering tough feedback? Any strategies you find helpful? #feedback #mindfulness #peoplemangement #leadership #LeadwithRajeev