You don't have to be in a formal leadership position to influence change and improvement. Influence comes from building a shared purpose and anyone can do this! Let's say you’ve spotted a way to make things better, faster, or smoother at work. You know this change could really help, but when you bring it up, the team pushes back or doesn’t seem interested. ⚠️ It’s easy to get frustrated or try harder to win people over. But pushing hard usually backfires. ❗ So instead, shift your focus to shared purpose and cooperation. 👉Let’s take a common example: the weekly team meeting. 👉The problem: you see issues with meetings- they run over, lack focus, and don’t result in clear outcomes. Here's a suggested response to influence improvement... 1️⃣ Ask Questions That Spark Reflection Get your team to reflect on the current meeting process by asking: ❓ “How do you feel about our weekly meetings — are they a good use of our time?” ❓ “What parts of our meetings feel most productive, and what parts feel like a time drain?” ❓ “Do we always leave meetings knowing who’s doing what?” (This will get people thinking...) 2️⃣ Highlight shared goals. Link your idea to something the whole team values: ❓ “I know we all want to have more time for focused work. What if we could cut our meeting time in half and still get everything done?” (Now, the focus isn’t on your idea — it’s on solving a shared problem) 3️⃣ Invite Ideas and Feedback Rather than presenting a fixed solution, co-create it: ❓ "I've made a suggestion but that's just one option- what ideas do you have?” (When the team helps shape the solution, they’re more invested in making it work) 4️⃣ Start Small and Test Together Propose trying a small, low-risk change, taking into account all suggestions: ❓ “How about next week, we try a 30-minute meeting with a strict agenda and clear action points documented? We can see how it feels, adjust if needed, and then try out other ideas?" (Small tests reduce the fear of change and show that you value collaboration) 5️⃣ Celebrate Progress as a Team If the new approach works, recognize the team effort: ❗ “Our meeting was only 30 minutes, and we still got through everything! ❗ “It’s great to see us using our time more effectively. Let’s keep this going.” You could apply these 5 steps to influencing any kind of change or improvement....oh and don't forget to be prepared, use data and work on those communication skills! What do you think? Could you try this to help build your #influence skills? Do you have any tips from your own experience? Leave your comments below 🙏
Techniques for Reducing Meeting Fatigue
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
An Insight into Managing Meeting-Intensive Days Recently, I had an enlightening 1:1 with one of our young designers. They asked, "After a day filled with back-to-back meetings, I'm exhausted. How do you handle this, given most of your days are meeting-heavy?" This scenario is common for many of us managing large teams and products. Here are some strategies I've developed to thrive when meetings dominate your schedule: 1. Mindset Shift: Recognize that meetings are work too, especially in large organizations. As a young designer, I viewed meetings as productivity thieves. Now I understand they're integral to the work process. 2. Calendar Mastery: I structure my day via my calendar, scheduling focus times, breaks, and meetings. I batch tasks and allocate them to ensure time-sensitive work gets done. 3. Pomodoro Technique: I aim for 24 pomodoros daily, equating to 12 hours of intense work. This includes writing, thinking, conversations, tasks, and team interactions. On lower-energy days, I listen to my body and adjust accordingly. 4. Micro-Breaks: Between meetings, I take 3-minute rejuvenation breaks. My toolkit includes: - Breathwork (sukha kriya, nadhi shuddi, 4-2-5-2 breathing with mudras) - Quick exercises (e.g., a set of squats) - Mindfulness practices (breath awareness meditation) - Short walks (using a walk pad or stepping outside) 5. Deep Listening: During meetings, I practice full engagement without multitasking. If a meeting doesn't align with my priorities, I respectfully decline or leave, communicating my reasons authentically. 6. Efficient Follow-up: I rarely revisit recordings, treating them as equivalent to attending meetings. When necessary, I schedule dedicated time for this. 7. Comprehensive Note-taking: I document discussions systematically, which helps track learning and identify recurring themes for myself and others. 8. Operational Rigor: I maintain high standards in self-management and task execution. This operational excellence keeps work flowing smoothly and maintains quality. These practices have transformed how I navigate meeting-intensive days, balancing productivity with well-being. What strategies do you employ to manage your energy during meeting-heavy periods? I'd love to hear your insights! #workdesign
-
For over 20 years, I’ve coached Fortune 500 CEOs. Along the way, I’ve sat in thousands of meetings, boardrooms, off-sites, and virtual calls that should have been emails. Here’s what I’ve learned: most meetings fail before they even start. Not because people aren’t smart or the agenda is wrong. Because the collaboration happens in the wrong place. Here are four shifts that will transform how your team meets. 1. Move the debate before the meeting. The best teams don’t show up to learn and debate for the first time. They show up having already been briefed and weighed in asynchronously, in shared documents, with real thinking on the table. The meeting becomes a decision room. 2. Shrink the room. Not everyone needs to be there. If someone’s contribution is already captured in the pre-work, free them. Smaller rooms move faster. They also talk more honestly. 3. Assign dissent. Consensus is comfortable, but it’s also dangerous. The highest-performing teams I’ve coached assign the team to provide challenges. Not to be difficult, but to make the final decision stronger. 4. End with commitments, not summaries. Most meetings end with a recap of what was said. That’s useless. End with who owns what and by when. Clarity beats closure. If you do these four things, your meetings won’t just feel better. They’ll actually produce results.
-
𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐨 𝐰𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟? 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞. During my stint as Group Medical Director with Dr Lal Path Labs, I was introduced to the concept of a pre-read. Anyone scheduled to speak should share the slide deck with relevant information as a pre-read with all the attendees. This allows for everyone to know the context in advance, giving time to review the details and build their point of view, allowing for a healthy discussion, rather than understanding the contents during the presentation. Taking into account this simple philosophy, here's how I suggest 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭. 1. 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞: Arriving 5 minutes before the start of the meeting allows the meeting to start on time and also time to address any tech glitches that could come up in making the presentation. 2. 𝐏𝐫𝐞-𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥: Consider sharing pre-read materials or literature related to the agenda which ensures that all participants have the chance to do their homework, and come prepared with thoughts, notes, & ideas, making the meeting more focused & effective. 3. 𝐁𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐞: Interactive meetings where all participants contribute makes for a healthier discussion. 𝐈 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 "𝐧𝐨 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐬!" 4. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬: It's not about scribbling down every word like a court stenographer. It's about capturing the non-negotiables, action points, and responsibilities in the moment. Consider them as not just records; they're your treasure map to the 'Aha!' moments that will help you think better and collaborate effectively post the discussion. 5. 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐔𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐧𝐠 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: Meeting minutes aren't meant to gather dust in your inbox; they're strategic tools. Break down minutes into bite-sized, achievable steps to ensure that discussions lead to tangible results. 6. 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 & 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭: How often do we jump from one meeting to another in a day? It's crucial to pause and reflect. Take a few minutes after the meeting to ponder on the discussed topics. Immediate reflection eliminates confusion and clutter, providing clarity when circling back to the key points. How do you approach meetings to ensure maximum productivity and efficiency? I would love to hear and learn from your insights. #preread #productivemeetings #DrSanjayArora
-
How to make your meetings 100x better: • Before each meeting, decide on the desired outcome. What needs to be happen by the end of this call? • The organizer should share an agenda at least 24h prior. Each item should have a clear purpose: – To discuss – To decide – To inform – To align • One person should always drive the meeting and be responsible for keeping everyone on time, on topic, and accountable. • If something can be achieved asynchronously (email, Loom, Google Docs), cancel the meeting, always. • Limit the number of participants in the meeting. If it's not clear whether someone should attend, leave them off and send them the Granola notes after. • Avoid recurring or standing meetings. Most of the time, "fake" work is created to fill time for the purpose of looking productive. • Default to 25-minute meetings. It instills focus and gives everyone a breather before the next one. • Disagreement is the most valuable thing that can happen in a meeting. When everyone agrees, no value is created. Instead, the person driving the meeting should nurture productive debate if it comes up. • Start the meeting by sharing data and insights, not anecdotes. This gives everyone a common starting point from which they can form their point of view. • Practice radical transparency by recording, transcribing, and documenting everything to be sent out over (easier than ever now!) • End every meeting with clear decisions and action items. No takeaways = wasted time. These are some of the things I've learned from my time at Google, Meta, and now Fibe. I hope it helps!
-
Ok, raise your hand if you've ever been the "fuzzy meeting person." 🙋♀️ 🙋♀️ 🙋♀️ I’d schedule sessions with no clear agenda, no defined outcome, basically, “let's chat and figure it out.” I’d leave half-exhausted, half-confused, thinking: "Did anything just get decided? Who’s doing what? Could this have been an email?" Probably everyone else thought that too. Waste of time. It took me a while, but I realized: the problem wasn’t the team. It was me. My meetings lacked clarity + intent. So I decided to get scientific about it. I started analyzing my meeting transcriptions with CoPilot. I wanted to see: - How much time I spent talking vs listening - How often I stated an explicit decision - Where confusion or rambling crept in The results were… eye-opening. I wasn’t just scheduling fuzzy meetings, I was enabling them. Here’s the system I built to fix it: Step 1. Define the single purpose (SO IMPORTANT) Every meeting needs a north star: “By the end, what should people know, decide, or do?” Step 2. Structure the agenda around outcomes List topics → assign a single desired outcome + time limit. Step 3. Prep key points, lead with decisions Skip long-winded context. Deliver the decision first, context second. Step 4. Track your talk ratio Use AI to see if you’re dominating or clarifying. Adjust accordingly. Step 5. End with explicit next steps Who does what, by when. No assumptions. Step 6. Follow up in writing 1–2 bullets summarizing decisions + assigned owners (you can do this with AI). Send within 24 hours. I also send transcripts if necessary. The transformation? Meetings went from draining and fuzzy → purposeful, productive, and trust-building. My coworkers leave knowing exactly what to do, and I finally stopped wondering why work wasn’t getting done. People like me more (hopefully?). Also, generally reduced my meeting frequency by 20ish%. Effectiveness frees us time, who knew. Moral: meetings are time, money, and trust. If people feel like you schedule fuzzy meetings, they'll be less committed. Use those steps to focus more on your clarity and intent. How do you make meetings more effective?
-
Everyone hates meetings because they’re the default, not the decision. ⏳ We pile people in a room to “figure it out,” with no owner, no pre-work, and a 60-minute calendar block that magically expands to fill itself. The result? Status theater, meandering updates, and nothing that actually moves. Here’s a simple playbook to make meetings not-awful (and actually useful) 🧰 Ask the killer question first: “Could this be async?” – If yes: write a 1-pager, comment in a thread, or record a quick walkthrough. Only meet if there’s real ambiguity or a decision to make. Define the outcome up front. – By the end we will: Decide X, Generate 3 options for Y, or Commit to a plan for Z. If you can’t write that sentence, you’re not ready to meet. Do the pre-work. – Send a one-pager 24 hours ahead. Start with 5 minutes of silent read so everyone begins at context, not catch-up. Invite fewer people. – 2–5 deciders + 1 scribe beats 12 spectators. Everyone else gets notes or a recording. Shorten the slot. – Default to 15 minutes. Add time only if the agenda demands it. Keep a “parking lot” for off-topic items. Assign clear roles. – DRI (owner), Facilitator (keeps time), Scribe (writes decisions), Approver (one person). Many “approvers” = no decision. Close strong. – End with: the decision, owners, deadlines, and the first next step. Ship notes within 10 minutes while context is fresh. Meeting alternatives to try this week: – Decision doc + comments – Async standup (yesterday/today/blockers) – Office hours block instead of recurring status – Living FAQ/playbook page for repeat questions – Annotated screen recording for walkthroughs Copy/paste “Meeting Brief” template: Goal: Type (Decision / Brainstorm / Kickoff / Retro): DRI: Must-have attendees: Pre-read link: Agenda with timestamps: Exit criteria (how we’ll know it worked): Risks / open questions: Next steps (owner + date): If every calendar invite had an outcome, pre-read, and a DRI, most meetings would be half as long and twice as valuable. What’s one change you’ll try this week?
-
I’ve been thinking a lot about the 90 minute virtual meeting paradox. We spend the first 30 minutes on welcoming everyone and introductions, the next 15 on framing, and then a few people share thoughts. Then, just when the conversation gets meaningful, the host abruptly announces "We're out of time!” and throws a few rushed closing thoughts and announcements together. Sound familiar? We crave deep, meaningful, trust-based exchanges in virtual meeting environments that feel both tiring and rushed. It seems like as soon as momentum builds and insights emerge, it’s time to wrap up. Share-outs become a regurgitation of top-level ideas—usually focused on the most soundbite-ready insights and omitting those seeds of ideas that didn’t have time to be explored further. And sometimes, we even cite these meetings as examples of participation in a process, even when that participation is only surface level to check the participation box. After facilitating and attending hundreds (thousands?) of virtual meetings, I've found four practices that create space for more engagement and depth: 1. Send a thoughtful and focused pre-work prompt at least a few days ahead of time that invites reflection before gathering. When participants arrive having already engaged with the core question(s), it’s much easier to jump right into conversation. Consider who designs these prompts and whose perspectives they center. 2. Replace round-robin introductions with a focused check-in question that directly connects to the meeting's purpose. "What's one tension you're navigating in this work?" for example yields more insight than sharing organizational affiliations. Be mindful of who speaks first and how difference cultural communication styles may influence participation. 3. Structure the agenda with intentionally expanding time blocks—start tight (and facilitate accordingly), and then create more spaciousness as the meeting progresses. This honors the natural rhythm of how trust and dialogue develop, and allows for varying approaches to processing and sharing. 4. Prioritize accessibility and inclusion in every aspect of the meeting. Anticipating and designing for participants needs means you’re thinking about language justice, technology and materials accessibility, neurodivergence, power dynamics, and content framing. Asking “What do you need to fully participate in this meeting?” ahead of time invites participants to share their needs. These meeting suggestions aren’t just about efficiency—they’re about creating spaces where authentic relationships and useful conversations can actually develop. Especially at times when people are exhausted and working hard to manage their own energy, a well-designed meeting can be a welcome space to engage. I’m curious to hear from others: What's your most effective strategy for holding substantive meetings in time-constrained virtual spaces? What meeting structures have you seen that actually work?
-
I've carefully observed hundreds of team meetings across industries, and one pattern emerges with striking consistency: the level of frustration team members feel leaving a meeting directly correlates with how clearly everyone understood why they were there in the first place. In one organization I worked with, weekly team meetings had become so unfocused that people openly admitted to bringing other work to complete while "listening." The meeting culture had deteriorated to the point where even the leader dreaded convening the team. Sound familiar? What transformed this team wasn't elaborate techniques or technology—it was implementing what I now call the "Purpose-Process-Outcome" framework. Before every meeting, this framework asks three deceptively simple questions: PURPOSE: Why are we meeting? What specific need requires us to gather synchronously rather than handling this asynchronously? PROCESS: How will we use our time together? What structures and activities will best serve our purpose? OUTCOME: What tangible result will we have produced by the end of this meeting? How will we know our time was well spent? When we implemented this framework with that struggling team, the transformation was remarkable: Meetings shortened from 90 minutes to 45. Participation increased dramatically. Most importantly, team members reported feeling that their time was respected. What made the difference? Each person walked in knowing exactly why they were there and what their role was in creating a specific outcome. One team member told me: "I used to leave meetings feeling like we'd just wasted an hour talking in circles. Now I leave with clear action items and decisions we've made together." Another unexpected benefit emerged: the team began to question whether meetings were always the right solution. They discovered that about 30% of their previous meeting time could be handled more efficiently through other channels. The framework forces clarity that many leaders avoid. When you can't clearly articulate why you're gathering people, what you'll do together, and what you'll produce, it's a signal to pause and reconsider. I've found that when team leaders commit to this framework, they stop being meeting facilitators and become architects of meaningful collaboration. The shift is subtle but profound—from "running" meetings to designing experiences that accomplish specific goals. What's your best tip for making meetings more productive? Share your wisdom in the comments. P.S. If you’re interested in developing as a leader, try out one of my Skill Sessions for free: https://lnkd.in/d38mm4KQ
-
𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐚 𝐍𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐂𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 For many startup leaders, especially introverts, meetings can feel like one of the worst parts of the role (and a good reason they left corporate life). However, well-designed and skillfully facilitated meetings encourage brainstorming, spark insights, and foster innovation. Here's how to set expectations: 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝑌𝑜𝑢 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.” — Bill Gates · Define a clear purpose: what exactly will get done in your time together? · Share materials and the agenda at least one day before. · Make everyone contribute, either by submitting questions and ideas before, offering ideas during the meeting, or sharing recommendations afterward. · If you're an introvert, plan time before/after meetings to recharge. 𝗗𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠.” — Susan Cain · Set clear expectations: collaboration, contribution, and conciseness. · Ensure everyone participates with questions, thoughts, or ideas. · For recurring meetings, consider having a different team member each time share a success story or a challenge. · Assign someone to manage time (this is a tough job, so support them). · Keep comments under 60 seconds so everyone has a chance to speak. · Consider appointing a devil's advocate to challenge any unchallenged ideas. · Close by reviewing objectives and establishing next steps, with each action item assigned to a single owner. Set specific deadlines for progress updates. · If you're an introvert, explain that your quietness is for thinking, not because you are judging. However, aim to speak up at least once in each meeting. 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑗𝑜𝑏 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔.” – David M. Cote · Recognize publicly all participants who made meaningful contributions. · Assess if everyone contributed and gained value. If not, decide whether they should participate more actively next time or be excluded. · Seek feedback on effectiveness through quick surveys or direct questions, such as "What's one way our time could have been better used?" · Send notes and call out immediate action items. The main value of meetings lies in the follow-through afterward. · If you're an introvert, you can offer to send ideas or clarifications after the meeting, since writing may be more your style. Success depends on valuing everyone's time, with the dual objectives of business growth and personal respect. #leaders #founder #adapt #startups